@stam9_gitlab, ok, I think the issue may be in the yaw targets that are being sent. I cannot see what values are being sent in the logs but may be you could check those. Make sure that the values are in radians... maybe just don't send them at all and see if it works better.
@RoboBil, yes, the "pose jump" message means that Thien's scripts noticed that the position was moving impossibly quickly. This points towards a camera issue and is probably not an ArduPilot or script issue.
hi Patrick, 2 hours running without problems - the battery was drop to 10,7 volts and then I had the power reset, so I think compiling realsense with this -BUILD_WITH_TM2=True on nano or other jetson boards can help
I´m testing with rover, I was doing some things today but I will test tomorow and return to you
Sorry Vin I really don't get it
"...Assuming you received from Intel an engineering sample of T265(TM2) device, enable support for it in the SDK.."
TM2 stands for a very particular case?
Oh...on the installation step 5 TM1-specific:
Tracking Module requires hid_sensor_custom kernel module to operate properly. Due to TM1's power-up sequence constraints, this driver is required to be loaded during boot for the HW to be properly initialized.
Interesting i saw in a lot of places to dont patch fhe kernel to use the realsense cameras in the realsense page about nano they just tell to install using pre compiled packages
Im runing more one hour and half without usb reset
@Huibean, that's very interesting. We are hoping to work with ANU (Australian National University) who is also working on an visual odometry system (open source of course) and Tridge suggested it would be good to be able to get it working in parallel with the T265's built-in algorithm so we can compare performance. I'll pass a link to ANU.
I think using a stable release instead of some random version (aka master) is probably a good idea but I'll have to remember from now on to update this version as Intel releases improvements.
I was also thinking that it might be good if the scripts were enhanced to show the firmware version being used. I guess for the T265 it's somehow updated automatically so the librealsense SDK version always matches the camera. This may be different for other cameras. Anyway, not urgent at all just a thought..
@rmackay9 out of curiosity who or which team at ANU are you working with? Rob Mahony?
The T265 camera works with raspberry 4. I connect the raspberry camera v. 2.1 and display the HDMI preview. After a minute or two, the t265 camera disconnects. Without a connected camera RPI v. 2.1, everything works fine. What could be the reason?
Hi Randy, I think this version of librealsense is precompiled right ? after the weekend testing, I really don't have more the usb issue on jetson after compiling with the TM2 . how I'm using on a rover, I ran for at least 8 hours - with time to swap and charge batteries and no issue with usb - just when the battery goes bellow 10.8 volts. One thing I'm trying to understand is the camera after booting the jetson is not detected by the kernel, nothing on dmesg, and sometimes this is not an issue, starting the t265_to_mavlink works fine, sometimes I had to shutdown the jetson, remove the cable, boot and just after that plug the camera. This was happening more when I was using the cable provivde by intel, after swaping the cable to a Wstern digital cable I until now just had 1 time this issue.
I saw someone testing with rover, I cant do guided mode on rover, there are something I can read or study to use with rover? is my first try with rover
@thien94 Thanks for your advice. Yes, you're right. Thanks to Randy's approach, librealsense-2.35.2 with Raspberry PI 4 4GB is working just fine also while in booting.
Hello I have tested on Rp4 with randy's apsync. Do you have an apsync image with ROS package installed to see rviz? I can't run sudo apt-get install ros-$ROS_VER-realsense2-camera`.
@juvinski, @RoboBil is also testing with Rover. I have not specifically tested Rover but it should work. You've setup the T265 and ArduPilot according to the wiki? https://ardupilot.org/rover/docs/common-vio-tracking-camera.html. Some key points, it's best to use Rover-4.1.0-dev and enable the EKF3 (explained on this wiki page). You'll need to set the EKF origin which can be done easily using the Mission Planner (also explained on the wiki page). It is easiest if you use an RPI4 with the standard APSync image to remove the chance of issues with the companion computer but if that's not possible, it's best to provide an onboard log (from the autopilot) so we can see if the companion computer is correctly sending the required messages (we will look a the VISP and VISV messages).
Hi @rmackay9 , yes, I followed the wiki and ekf3. I was testing the d435 on a RvR and I fight with problems of depth measurement on objects on the ground. I was testing today and I saw even with right confidence level variations and jumps on the messages, I opened an issue at intel's realsense git. I will do more tests tomorow and I wll post the logs for you - how I was checking the stability of the t265 the log is hudge, so i will do a smal test - I could ran missions without a problem - instead the jump message, so I will test this and send the log :)
Hi. I'm still very new to ROS and Pixhawk. I'm currently working on my drone project. Currently I have been given a task to send ROS data to Pixhawk flight controller. So I'm able to run the 2d Drone Navigation code in the simulated environment, where I'm able to acheive mapping, localization and path planning. However, now I want to send the odometry data (ground_truth/state) to my pixhawk flight controller. When I do rostopic echo/ground_truth/state - I can see the pose, position, covariance and twist data. And I need to send this data to my flight controller. Please if anyone can suggest, it'd be really helpful for me. Thank you :)
@gauravshukla914, I did some random googling and found that "ground_truth" is not a ros topic, it's a gazebo topic and you may need to use gazebo_ros. I don't know much really but I've never heard of this topic before.
Thank you @rmackay9 for your compliments! Also many thanks to @patrickpoirier51 for your guidance so far!
@patrickpoirier51, I'm working on creating another apsync image with the update librealsense (2.35.2 instead of 2.33.1). While I'm updating it I would also like to make it easier for users to switch between 2.4Ghz and 5Ghz. One of the other testers said everything was fine for him on 2.4Ghz using the older APSync image. It looks like it's just the wifi.channel and wifi.operation-mode that I need to update. For 5Ghz it's "48" and "a" respectively. Do you know what these should be for 2.4Ghz?