set some values and click abstain, when it mints you should see votes in those minted blocks
Eleven711
@Eleven711
now is the height around 56280
CoinGame
@CoinGame
one second
errr I have to boot up my vm to check
64265 is the heigh according to my local node
let me check the supernode to make sure
Eleven711
@Eleven711
do you mean: you set some vote first and then click abstain, then you can see the vote you set before, right?
CoinGame
@CoinGame
it looks like the supernode is down.. I'll check that out
yes, that's correct
pre existing votes are being cast into blocks after you click abstain
Eleven711
@Eleven711
Now I am syncing.
I think I did not consider that.
CoinGame
@CoinGame
That's why i'm here :D
Eleven711
@Eleven711
so do you think the pre existing will be cleared empty ?
CoinGame
@CoinGame
is it possible to keep the existing vote configuration, but simple leave the votes in the block empty?
because maybe someone has votes, and clicks abstain to test, and then it removes all of their stuff
that would be a bit frustrating
Eleven711
@Eleven711
yep, I think so, later I will consider more and fix it . thanks bro
CoinGame
@CoinGame
np dude
will keep testing
going to try and upgrade the testnet to 5.0 as well
Eleven711
@Eleven711
well done. :clap:
Eleven711
@Eleven711
@CoinGame hi, I fixed the problem and submited it. Also I update the foreign address create .
CoinGame
@CoinGame
Hey guys. The NuBits price crash combined with having to pay for the NuBits.com open source conversion out of my own pocket has caused a lot of issues for me. I'm going to be side tracked quite a bit until I get things figured out. I'll get back to focus on B&C as time allows
Cybnate
@Cybnate
Hope you are still keeping an eye on things and hope you can reply to my proposal for B&C. It may get you some NSR or BTC from the reserves and hopefully out of the woods.
CoinGame
@CoinGame
hi @Cybnate , can you link to the proposal? the forum is a mess right now withs posts and i'm having trouble keeping up
Cybnate
@Cybnate
The forum moves fast and lots of pranks and new IDs swerving around indeed. It's a pity.
My question was about the time it would take for you to validate eleven's work for 5.0. I'm keen to get 5.0 tested, packaged an out to the shareholders.
And are you still being paid for testing work or do we need to create an ad hoc fund?
Cybnate
@Cybnate
@JordanLeePeershares Are you still available to lead B&C development in an architect's role?
CoinGame
@CoinGame
Personally, given the recent eratic behavior, I would not want to continue under his leadership (or lack there of).
cryptog
@cryptog
I understand @CoinGame . Do u think Nu needs @JordanLeePeershares ? In a real DAO, nobody should be irreplacable.
CoinGame
@CoinGame
I think @sigmike would be able to lead the project from concept to code complete, but managing all of the other aspects in the challenge. Payments, fundings.
cryptog
@cryptog
@CoinGame in thay case nu should elect members for payments, fundings and other tasks.
Cybnate
@Cybnate
I had to ask as no one bothered until now. MIA is certainly a good reason to look at alternatives :-) I would also support Sigmike, under his technical leadership, I might be even willing to take care of the funds etc. We all need to think about what would be an appropriate reward for doing that. I'm open to be paid in BKS as long as Sigmike is doing the tech lead role. We will also need to auction BKS to pay Sigmike and Eleven in BTC.
cryptog
@cryptog
Hi there!
Cybnate
@Cybnate
Hi cryptog
cryptog
@cryptog
Hi there. Any motion to vote for?
Cybnate
@Cybnate
@Eleven711 Can you please advise whether you are still working on B&C? Haven't heard any update for a while. Thanks.
cryptog
@cryptog
no contact any more with @Eleven711
Cybnate
@Cybnate
Just dropping it here. I have access to B&C website if changes are needed. Just drop me a line and add a request in the repo on github