Where communities thrive

Join over 1.5M+ people
Join over 100K+ communities
Free without limits
Create your own community

Explore more communities

BSData/warhammer-age-of-sigmar

Warhammer: Age of Sigmar

People

Repo info

Activity

07:54

StuxAlpha commented #1145
Dec 15 22:26

cartag commented #1145
Dec 15 22:26

cartag assigned #1145
Dec 15 10:56

StuxAlpha opened #1145
Dec 14 11:55

UrsinePatriarch commented #1140
Dec 14 11:53

UrsinePatriarch opened #1144
Dec 14 10:28

UrsinePatriarch commented #1042
Dec 13 18:47

OftKilted on master

Merge pull request #6 from BSDa… Fixed Nagash problem, more to f… Fixed Nagash, incremented prope… and 1 more (compare)
Dec 13 18:47

OftKilted closed #1143
Dec 13 18:39

UrsinePatriarch opened #1143
Dec 12 16:09

cartag commented #1042
Dec 11 16:26

Tigerwraith commented #1138
Dec 11 13:53

alphalas commented #1042
Dec 11 13:51

alphalas commented #1042
Dec 11 13:48

Ginjitzu commented #1042
Dec 11 12:50

alphalas commented #1042
Dec 11 12:50

alphalas commented #1042
Dec 11 12:49

alphalas commented #1042
Dec 11 07:40

Ginjitzu commented #1042
Dec 11 04:34

BSDataAnon opened #1142

OftKilted

@OftKilted

True

WindstormSCR

@WindstormSCR

you can see how I did the OR options

like bestigors/tuskgors as just an entry group

OftKilted

@OftKilted

So, categories in both the Root location, and the Shared Selection Entry.

It looks much more doable.

@Mad-Spy What do you think of the proposal by @WindstormSCR ?

@WindstormSCR I like it :+1:

WindstormSCR

@WindstormSCR

just make sure the battalion constraints have the "shared" box unchecked, or it'll cause wierdness with battalion+loose units

Iain Launchbury

@Mad-Spy

I'd tried this but the missing piece was Categories on the SSEs! I don't love the output, but it's usable.

WindstormSCR

@WindstormSCR

with AoS rules being free there is zero excuse for them to not have the proper ref anyway

Iain Launchbury

@Mad-Spy

The Battletomes with the Battalions in aren't free.

WindstormSCR

@WindstormSCR

I meant the units that get scrambled

Iain Launchbury

@Mad-Spy

Oh right. True.

WindstormSCR

@WindstormSCR

so two things about categories in SSEs

1) don't make them 'primary'
2) make sure the battalion constraints on SSEs are not shared

and it all works

Iain Launchbury

@Mad-Spy

We have primary categories in 40k and it works ok?

WindstormSCR

@WindstormSCR

I was getting odd double-count issues when I did primary in the aos sses

but as long as they have the right ones and none marked primary it works fine

Iain Launchbury

@Mad-Spy

Ok. I'll have a look later.

Iain Launchbury

@Mad-Spy

@WindstormSCR, your solution works. There just a small niggle in that units which switch battlefield role will show both categories.

WindstormSCR

@WindstormSCR

option 2 is just use the categories that will show in battalions, since root cats should override

OftKilted

@OftKilted

@Mad-Spy what stuff does the switch? (Drawing a blank)

Double counting battalions is also bad as the number of battalions determines the numbers of artifacts available

Iain Launchbury

@Mad-Spy

There are duplicate RSEs with different primary categories. Not sure what you mean about double counting?

OftKilted

@OftKilted

In the picture for the layout you can see “categories: Battalion, battalion”

If, at some point, we’re going to do validation for number of artefacts, double counting is not the hotness

Ie counting the battalions twice

Iain Launchbury

@Mad-Spy

I don't see the duplication in my version of the implementation, so it may just be something that @WindstormSCR did when he was building his version

or are you just talking about the naming convention? All the battalions in Chaos are prefixed "Battalion:" in their name.

we can remove that easily

I see now in the image. I don't get that in my version, so I think we'll be fine.

Iain Launchbury

@Mad-Spy

Iain Launchbury

@Mad-Spy

I love that that battalion can be 920 -8890 points.

OftKilted

@OftKilted

http://puu.sh/zdgG0/f5747eeb86.png

At the top you can see categories: Battalion, Battalion

That being said, I’m not as big a fan of “Unit(Wizard)”

Are we going to do “Unit(Priest)”?

And “Ability(Command)”

Abilities (Battalion)

Iain Launchbury

@Mad-Spy

I agree on Wizard. It should be a separate item like psyker in 40k. I quite like abilities being separated.

OftKilted

@OftKilted

The issue I have is that they’re “Battle Traits” and “Command Traits”

Battalion Abilities being flagged that these are Abilities from the Battalion isn’t a bad idea. I’m just more of a fan of calling them what they are.

And from an aggregate perspective, an ability is an ability.

OftKilted

@OftKilted

Though there are both command traits and command abilities. And they’re explicitly separated. Hmmmmm

I’ll defer to your judgment on the Abilities

Iain Launchbury

@Mad-Spy

Comand Traits

Command Traits come from Allegiance though right?

OftKilted

@OftKilted

Which are different

While “Command/Unit/Battalion” Abilities are still Abilities (as are spells and prayers)