Where communities thrive


  • Join over 1.5M+ people
  • Join over 100K+ communities
  • Free without limits
  • Create your own community
People
Repo info
Activity
  • 01:04
    cartag assigned #1074
  • 00:29
    cartag assigned #1068
  • 00:29
    cartag closed #1068
  • 00:29
    cartag commented #1068
  • 00:28

    cartag on v2.1.6

    (compare)

  • 00:26
    robbette72 opened #1074
  • 00:25

    cartag on master

    Add files via upload Corrected Unit Visibility Vargheists Update and 1 more (compare)

  • 00:25
    cartag closed #1073
  • 00:25
    cartag opened #1073
  • Oct 23 22:54

    cartag on cartag

    Vargheists Update (compare)

  • Oct 23 22:48

    cartag on cartag

    Corrected Unit Visibility (compare)

  • Oct 23 15:11
    Faitfull commented #1067
  • Oct 22 21:25
    cartag edited #1067
  • Oct 22 21:25
    cartag edited #1067
  • Oct 22 21:24
    cartag closed #1072
  • Oct 22 21:24
    cartag commented #1072
  • Oct 22 21:24
    cartag assigned #1072
  • Oct 22 20:22

    cartag on cartag

    Add files via upload (compare)

  • Oct 22 15:58
    tatoren opened #1072
  • Oct 22 13:52
    nottsknight edited #1067
Simon Barlow
@FreylisUK
Ugh... damn you GW!
Either way we're still doing more validation than either Azyr or Warscroll Builder :smile:
Iain Launchbury
@Mad-Spy
hmm, this is very interesting. This could work.
It means that the Force Entries would need to move to the individual catalogues, but you could make an "<Role>-Ally" primary category which is the only option in a sub-force and give that as a Primary on the current ally entries, but retain the Allegiance visibility switch....
we might not even need to move the force entries actually.
Jon Kissinger
@alphalas
Just out of curiosity how close to done are seraphon?
OftKilted
@OftKilted
@
@alphalas Oh .... I believe folks are focusing on KO and the new lizard women in the order Faction. The horrible murder death kill ones ... and Sylvaneth ... which may or may not be the same thing ...
Once I get Death out of the way if they still need help (and if @Mad-Spy doesn’t need any help with chaos... Because Everyone Should all have a little Change ...) Incan see about helping out.
OftKilted
@OftKilted
@alphalas Do you want me to stand up a Dropbox repo for you To test out the TK for me?
I don’t have Death allegiance Abilities or Artefacts in yet.
Jon Kissinger
@alphalas
Sure I can totally do that
Looks like I’m gunna be snowed in next 2 days
OftKilted
@OftKilted
Uuuuf
So, do you need me to set up a repo for you? Or do you just want to pull the files yourself!
.. ignore the ! ... whee autocorrect
Or me mistyping a ?
Jon Kissinger
@alphalas
I’ll just pull them down lol - just point me in a direction
OftKilted
@OftKilted
@alphalas You'll want death.cat and Age of Sigmar.gst from https://github.com/BSData/warhammer-age-of-sigmar/tree/Chaos-updates
They don't ally with anyone. So unless you're trying to pull units from a generic death alliance, that covers what you're working with.
We're moving to the AoS 2.0 branch ... so my next set of updates will likely end up there.
But that's just covering the legions of nagash, and then I'll get FEC profiles in.
And then I'll get the command traits and artefacts
Rick Weyrauch
@rweyrauch
Go ahead and start on the DoK @FreylisUK. I am back from holiday and will continue with the minor factions - those w/o battletomes.
Iain Launchbury
@Mad-Spy
@/all, thanks to inspiration from @FreylisUK, I am now thinking that we should be able to split the catalogues along Allegiance/Faction lines and maintain Allies validation. I know we've all done a decent amount of work towards maintaining the monoliths, but are people amenable to changing tack at this stage?
Iain Launchbury
@Mad-Spy
Having studied Azyr a bit as well, I'm thinking we should lose Pitched Battle Faction at the same time.
OftKilted
@OftKilted
@Mad-Spy what’s the plan?
Right now I’m not entirely sure that Death (specifically LoN) is amenable to being split (though pulling out FEC and TK is likely not too terrible)
Iain Launchbury
@Mad-Spy
Yeah, I think LoN is going to have to be one cat with a sub-faction switch, otherwise you'll be duplicating, but it should still work.
OftKilted
@OftKilted
The only other question I might have is the potentials for duplication with all of the units in Chaos that can be flagged with a mark of Chaos
So, what’s the vision?
Iain Launchbury
@Mad-Spy
They won't need duping, because they'll be in a "SLAVES TO DARKNESS" cat, which is an allegiance.
We will need to move the Force Entries to the individual cats. Then you can allow child forces, and then disallow keywords in those forces which can't be allies.
or allow acceptable ones, maybe
OftKilted
@OftKilted
Soul Grinder? Some of the Daemons? (And the Daemon Prince is amusing as it is listed in StD... but has no Slaves keyword)
Iain Launchbury
@Mad-Spy
it's Slaves PBF (and Slaves Allegiance in Azyr)
You can let me worry about those ones :)
OftKilted
@OftKilted
I happen to have a slightly vested interest in Tzeentch
Iain Launchbury
@Mad-Spy
:)
image.png
OftKilted
@OftKilted
I’m going to be slightly mean.
Iain Launchbury
@Mad-Spy
something like this, where PRIEST is the keyword which can't be an ally.
OftKilted
@OftKilted
Why are we actually breaking Pitched Battle values it into point ranges?
Iain Launchbury
@Mad-Spy
Because you can't do the limits properly using percentages.
I tried it while looking at this and couldn't get it to work
OftKilted
@OftKilted
Wait ... why are you needing to do percentages?
Iain Launchbury
@Mad-Spy
because it's effectively 20% of your points can be allies
at each bracket
OftKilted
@OftKilted
It’s a max / min point bracket ...