Where communities thrive


  • Join over 1.5M+ people
  • Join over 100K+ communities
  • Free without limits
  • Create your own community
People
Repo info
Activity
  • 14:23
    UrsinePatriarch opened #1139
  • 14:20
    UrsinePatriarch closed #1137
  • 14:19
    UrsinePatriarch synchronize #1137
  • 14:17
    UrsinePatriarch commented #1040
  • 14:12
    UrsinePatriarch commented #1048
  • 10:32
    UrsinePatriarch commented #1041
  • 10:27
    UrsinePatriarch commented #1042
  • 09:43
    UrsinePatriarch commented #1107
  • 09:09
    UrsinePatriarch opened #1138
  • 08:56
    UrsinePatriarch commented #1136
  • 08:48
    UrsinePatriarch commented #1135
  • 06:14
    UrsinePatriarch commented #1116
  • 06:12
    UrsinePatriarch commented #995
  • 06:09
    UrsinePatriarch opened #1137
  • 04:10
    BSDataAnon opened #1136
  • Dec 05 22:05
    BSDataAnon opened #1135
  • Dec 05 16:00
    zmaltais opened #1134
  • Nov 30 20:19

    cartag on v2.1.12

    (compare)

  • Nov 30 20:18

    cartag on cartag

    (compare)

  • Nov 30 20:18

    cartag on master

    Bug Fixes Bug fixes Bug Fixes - Battalions and 2 more (compare)

OftKilted
@OftKilted
Take a peek in my FEC catalog. That’s relatively solid. IMO
Any errors I will blame on the ale.
tekton
@tekton
@OftKilted which branch is that one best to look at it in¿
OftKilted
@OftKilted
(Aos-v2.0) Death-Flesh-eater courts is my implementation for FEC
Probably not perfect. But it seemed to work just fine and for the 1000/2000/2500 point levels
Iain Launchbury
@Mad-Spy
you can fix categories by copying the IDs between the catalogues. The slight difficulty is identifying which ones you've missed!
i.e. make the category in the new catalogue have the same ID as the one in the old catalogue.
OftKilted
@OftKilted
For the ones I ran into it would have been copying the ID from the gst into the old catalog
Iain Launchbury
@Mad-Spy
ah, you forgot to switch them over! I tend to rename the catalogue ones to make finding them easier
OftKilted
@OftKilted
@mad-spy Anyway, what did I miss? (Inquiring minds want to know ...)
Iain Launchbury
@Mad-Spy
I don't know. What did you miss?
OftKilted
@OftKilted
“Some stuff you spotted...”
Iain Launchbury
@Mad-Spy
oh yeah. Allegiance is misspelled on the SSE.
um...
OftKilted
@OftKilted
Ahh. I blame a lack of spill checkers
;)
Iain Launchbury
@Mad-Spy
spill chockers?
OftKilted
@OftKilted
Probably ...
Anything else come to mind?
What’d you think of my solution to the “Instance of Allies” issue?
Iain Launchbury
@Mad-Spy
Haven't had a chance to look at anything properly yet. Had a load of admin to do for a society I'm in. Nearly done and then I'll take a look.
OftKilted
@OftKilted
No worries. I validated it using the Allies functionality as well.
Iain Launchbury
@Mad-Spy
what am I looking for?
OftKilted
@OftKilted
Take a peek at the SSE for General
Iain Launchbury
@Mad-Spy
I think that's what I did in mine as well?
OftKilted
@OftKilted
You only had it for 1000 points
You need all three Allies ... they’re different IDs
And we’re not using the Allies category
Iain Launchbury
@Mad-Spy
ok, then I don't understand what you've done :D
OftKilted
@OftKilted
You’re hiding General if instance of Allies
The Allies you’re an instance of is the Force Category
Iain Launchbury
@Mad-Spy
yes
OftKilted
@OftKilted
There’s a unique ID for each force category
You’d only selected one of them
Iain Launchbury
@Mad-Spy
yes, I just haven't fixed my cats since I updated the GST
OftKilted
@OftKilted
No worries, I was basing it off the stuff you’d published :smile: :+1:
Iain Launchbury
@Mad-Spy
your implementation of Damage tables is prettier than the default option... :D
OftKilted
@OftKilted
I had to do a custom one for each of the units that needed one to get that done
Iain Launchbury
@Mad-Spy
yeah, it's "messier" in terms of the amount of work you need to do.
OftKilted
@OftKilted
But it looks much much cleaner
Ended up going back and redoing Nagash and the Mortis Engine
Iain Launchbury
@Mad-Spy
one downside is that it means it moves around in the display.
unless we go back to numbering the profile types, which i really don't like.
OftKilted
@OftKilted
Not following.
Iain Launchbury
@Mad-Spy
Because the output is alphabetised, the wound table for different units will be in different places.
OftKilted
@OftKilted
Yeah ... this is true, depending on how you’re displaying the data. I was displaying data in a unit centric method (basically a default view)
One could put a non-text character to force it to a specific point

But as it’s all one type of “X Wound table” it will at least still be together under X. Only oddities is that I did have several wound tables that were reused. (Zombie Dragons and Terrorgheists)

The perfect is the enemy of the good. Or Good enough.

Iain Launchbury
@Mad-Spy
I'm not complaining. I like yours better
I might change all of mine :)