That summoned Bloodthirster one was part of the general FAQ. It was Baer from Spiky Bits doing click bait again
I believe it was anyway, let me track it down
Q: If you play Daemons and you successfully summon a Bloodthirster using the Daemonology psychic powers, what profile will the Bloodthirster have: the one in Codex: Chaos Daemons, or one of the ones in Codex: Khorne Daemonkin?
A:You can choose to use any of the army list entries from Codex: Chaos Daemons, Codex: Khorne Daemonkin or War Zone Fenris: Curse of the Wulfen – but not Skarbrand!
A:You can choose to use any of the army list entries from Codex: Chaos Daemons, Codex: Khorne Daemonkin or War Zone Fenris: Curse of the Wulfen – but not Skarbrand!
Oh. Well then ...
That sucks
I mean, it's good - but no Chaos FAQ sucks
I've come to realize iOS behaves in the oddest way with conditionals :/
Ooo yes.
It looks at the first instance of an increment conditional and just pretends it doesn't exist.
Because ... why not.
Everything after? works fine. but that first one, nope.
And links dont work properly either sometimes :P
IOS just sicks
*Sucks
On the plus side, I'm learning about every duct tape patch there is for making it work.
Haha the hours of life i have wasted on work arounds for IOS
Haha, hopefully now that I know them it'll stick with me.
They're dirty solutions, but they work :smile:
Think of all the re-working we will do when 2.0 hits if they are resoled
Hah, If it reduces clutter in the cats that's fine.
Of the workarounds I use the only one that actually is using an excess of lines is the Incriment/Decriment workaround.
Since i'm just using a lot of "Set Max/Set Min" instead.
The show/hide one is easy enough. Jon added "Is Not Instance Of" which'll be nice, but won't save all that much over Hide If Less than 1.
/the linking one also does, as you need to copy the same entries in multiple locations to overcome it.
Ew that sucks.
Haven't run into that one y et
This message was deleted
An example is #2092 dissected above.
Sneaky, I still saw it :smile:
@hisop
*Dissected.
lol
I was in a rush to re do the comment as the No was wrong :P
damn auto correct
haha
i should realy do #2103 but its a hassle :P i hate adding new entries especially complex ones.
ugh that does look like a pain
I'm gonna close the Space Wolves issues today since @SuperPranx is off and on he says. I'll look at adding those while i'm working on stuff if you want.
If i'm putting off my 2.0 rewrite of C:SM I'd rather at least be closing issues instead ;p
I think its worth closing issues we con only resolve in 2.0 we can always raise them later but i think most of us will re-wirte for 2.0 anyway.
solving them as we go.
For now they are just clutter.
Yea, I hope that's the case for 2.0
I'm curious if I can figure out a workaround for some of these though :/
As you can see thats what i was doing previously :P
But some are a hassle
also - an aside for 2.0, I think we should all reset the catalogs to V1
I agree
This big of a change to cats, a fresh versioning would be good.
May have to ask john to add something about deleting cats when you upgrade though
Yea, that'd be a good idea.
Has anyone tested rosters at all?
With the 2.0 repository.
Like, will a 1.15 roster work with a 2.0 catalog?
assuming no changes, just base conversion to 2.0
for the most part they do
Alright
i had a 1 line change for sisters
one condition "forgot the child"
ohers worked fine
but im probably going to re-work a few things atleast for each before release.
Yea, I imagine it'll just be best to re-make most army lists for people
oh yeah do you have a link for death from the skies? so i can add in to other cat's?
I keep it on my jump.
I'll throw it on dropbox.
Awesome
thank you
np
Whelp, there's 1 that I can't figure out how to elegently do :/
which?
the collective bug
where it increments bolt pistols by 2 instead of 1 but only when you have 5 selections of something else at the same time.
you can take the wepons at a squad level
not great though but its all i could think of
what's the issue you're having?
Yea, But then setting max with increment would introduce the iOS bug.
or do the "scout with sniper rifle" "scout with bolter"
with increment just being ignored for the first time.
Yea, that might work.
@2014 cartag.
#
er. ... #2014
Trying to clear the 3 space wolf issues that've been open for months.
Look at sister of battle squad in adeptus sororitas for an example
Scout with sniper would be a good way to go about it.
scratch that not the best example, grey knights melle weapons is better but i think you see what i mean.
oh yea - that is good.
yeah think its the best option, "grey knight - strike squad"
yea that's the one i'm looking at now
If all else fails, there's how the Chosen are done in CSM
GK example worked :)
Great :)
Not in line with the rest of SW, but this one could also do with a revamp to condense un-needed things.
Entire shared entries are marked Collective ... I can't mess with much without breaking so much else.
So for now, it works.
I've made changes to some of those in areas I've touched in the past because the 'collective' part was breaking some of the new formations. I agree that it needs a revamp... maybe even a do-over when 2.0 is done.
Yea, @SuperPranx, the more issues I look into, the more I find a lot of revamps can be done when 2.0 hits.
Yeah its a real Hodge poge it was a nightmare to add the wulfen stuff in. its been patched togeter over years it coulr do with e re-write but it would take an age.
Yep :/ Oh well, C:SM first - then perhaps Space wolves.
I think I can get the other two issues working/fixed for now
That +1 WS is a tricky bitch.
Haha, most of the cats i manage are small but thats why they are many :P
Haha, I don't even play C:SM and I decided to take it over lol
Tau and Necrons are mine, but those are both well organized.
My roomate does though, so after hearing him voice his issues - figured I'd just try and fix them :p
The problem witht he likes of SM and wolves is they are so large and have so many sources half a dozen people contribute and theyy have no central authority.
yea ... how I wish we could choose a single format and guidelines for cat creation and then stick to them across all codex.
Yataa, +1 WS works for Strike Force Daggerfist!
Well this is on a volunteer basis and most regular managers don't have the time to enforce this kind of thing.
It's ugly .. but what fixes do I make that aren't :/
Oh yea, that's what I mean.
Just wistful thinking.
Congrats on the fix's :P
shit, I didn't get anything fixed last night. I'm sorry for saying I would fix it and then failing to. I'm a horrible person :(
Nah it doesnt matter :P
? Don't worry about it. We sat at 45 issues for a month and a half.
Dont worry about it.
And that was mostly my fault :P
I'm ecctatic that we're down to 15 (soon to be 12)
bad mental health day, sorry :/
I said "il fix that now" about the skitarii maniple formation for like a month :P and @Kohato did it in the end :P
Haha yea. You don't have to do it, but I will eventually if you don't :p
@SuperPranx so for #2000 the most elegent way to fix it now was this - in Strike Fist Dagger force, there is now a manditory selection of "Kingsguard" for the WG/WGT units, which will modify the profiles. It is hidden in a regular CAD.
That should suffice for a fix until we get Ancestor in 2.0
does it work in IOS (show/hide has issues)
Does if you hide :)
and not show.
Great :)
Another wonderful ios quirk.
has no problem hiding something, but emprah forbid you try to show something already hidden
Figuring that one out was the only way to fix Angels of Death on ios.
It was a nightmare for IK
Yea I imagine :(
Especially with War convo.
Yeah war convo and FW combo was a pain
Though that was an elegent way to do the war convocation
the sub-forces.
I love the way the Wolf Scouts work now. Nice fix :D
all @hisop there, he pointed me to Gray Knights :)
Thank you both :)
*grey :P Haha no worries, its my preferred system for squad load-outs like this.
Color Colour
But for once it is a British franchise :P so i will defend The "Correct" spelling :)
Hahaha
Any opinions on #1528?
Can just make it a choice
Agreed. I'll start on that then.
Wait, i'm confused ... Hades is already set as a dedicated transport in IA12.
But it doesn't change the squad to elite if it's taken
Ahah - thanks.
Whitch is impossible
Yea, no way to do that, but I can add two versions - 1 elite, 1 not.
But we can add something into elites
Beat me to it
was just confused on what was actually needed - thanks.
Wow ... MECHANICUM ORDINATUS
that thing looks awesome
lmao 700 and 1075 points.
Yup
I'm going to add It in tonight I hope
Doing it now :)
I ran out of issues to fix.
Ahh fair doos Haha
Holy crap this thing will be hard to kill for anyone but necrons. ... even for necrons.
14HP, 6+ invuln.
And more vocal disbelief. One of the choices has a 180" range SD AP1 10" Blast.
I can decimate an army 3 tables over.
That's 15 feet.
Haha yeah foreword like to push the boundaries
The other option is pretty cool. It's a beam weapon ... but 7" wide beam instead of 1mm wide beam.
Added :), also hidden unless Show FW is chosen in No Force Org.
So feel free to use that for future FW entries as well.
Well, i should say, it's shown unless there are 0 entries of Show FW chosen ... to be truley correct.
Are there really enough entries in the Mechanicum list to merit hiding Forge World entries? The hide Forge World buttons have been defended in the past to handle the excessive catalogs (C:SM and friends), not for prudishness about Forge World.
I think Show FW was considered the standard just due to the bigger files needing it. I see no problem with leaving it or for that
Leaving it out*
Lol not at all. 2 models. I just love keeping things consistent so I added it
I'll take it out when I get home. Quick 7 lines to delete.
May As well keep it but reverse it to show by default maybe, that's what I did for IK as there's not enough to justify hiding for readability but it's useful for tournaments or if you only have source material.
Show by default then hide if breaks it on iOS.
er, no - other way around ...
wait what do you mean then
Look at IK
Ah, yea I match IK.
Showing by default and hiding if no insstance of Show Forgeworld selected.
@capitaladot was saying there's no need for the filter at all since there's only 2 models.
I know but I think it has a use case
It's a nice feature to have and it ads uniformity
Ah, that's what you're getting at. Yes - I agree. I like uniformity.
A lot.
Uniformly bad user experience. Lots of extra clicks to build a list for no real reason.
1.
not lots. 1
Sorry, 2
I think an extra click or 2 extra taps on the phone is better if it helps achieve uniformity for people who use multiple catalogs.
And you only need the extra clicks if you want to hide it otherwise it's no different to bot having it.
Other way around. Extra click or 2 taps on phone to show it. same as IK has it.
I reversed IK to the other way
ohh. Mine must be out of date then