These are chat archives for BSData/wh40k

2nd
Sep 2016
flakpanda
@flakpanda
Sep 02 2016 00:43
@cartag, @Kohato I have been looking over it, and for the deathwatch strike team, i think it should not go in the new DW catalog. the apoc formation doesnt use any of the data cards from the new DW codex. I know it has DW in the name, but it uses all SM data cards.
Earl Bishop
@DrTobogganMD
Sep 02 2016 00:44
I'd agree.
Dark Harvest necrons are the same way - they have to be separate for IA13.
Since they used old 5th ed necron rules and profiles.
cartag
@cartag
Sep 02 2016 00:44
Ditto, it was SM because DW want a faction with a dex at the time of its release
flakpanda
@flakpanda
Sep 02 2016 00:44
should it be with the rest of the SM apoc formation in that catalog?
cartag
@cartag
Sep 02 2016 00:45
I vote yes
flakpanda
@flakpanda
Sep 02 2016 00:45
the SM one
Earl Bishop
@DrTobogganMD
Sep 02 2016 00:45
Same
Aye
flakpanda
@flakpanda
Sep 02 2016 00:46
I will update the issue in queue then
Earl Bishop
@DrTobogganMD
Sep 02 2016 00:46
God I need to stop being lazy and fix SM one of these days.
flakpanda
@flakpanda
Sep 02 2016 00:46
lol
Earl Bishop
@DrTobogganMD
Sep 02 2016 00:46
the actual SM. Not Deathwatch SM :smile:
In 2.0 I mean.
Something I did broke it at some point
flakpanda
@flakpanda
Sep 02 2016 00:47
also, i dont have IA books (legit or otherwise) to re-include the knights into the DW catalog.
are they the exact ones from the SM catalog?
Earl Bishop
@DrTobogganMD
Sep 02 2016 00:47
The FW ones, yea.
flakpanda
@flakpanda
Sep 02 2016 00:47
i can just copy pasta them then?
Earl Bishop
@DrTobogganMD
Sep 02 2016 00:48
The Cerastus/Questeris
You'll likely need to fix things if they involve links
but yes.
flakpanda
@flakpanda
Sep 02 2016 00:49
ok
do you want me to “assign” you the formation issue @Kohato?
Earl Bishop
@DrTobogganMD
Sep 02 2016 00:57
Sure