These are chat archives for BSData/wh40k

15th
Nov 2016
Jon Kissinger
@alphalas
Nov 15 2016 00:19 UTC
@Kohato dude, CF chapter tactics don't exist
Earl Bishop
@DrTobogganMD
Nov 15 2016 00:19 UTC
Nor does any other Chapter Tactics specific to a chapter
Show me where Chapter Tactics (Ultramarines) is defined.
Jon Kissinger
@alphalas
Nov 15 2016 00:21 UTC
In the ultramarine chapter tactics section?
CF for all intents and purposes are IF
Earl Bishop
@DrTobogganMD
Nov 15 2016 00:22 UTC
And where does it say that?
If that is true, Black Templars can also take Pedro
Which is 100% false.
Pedro Kantor is 100% in print, Imperial Fists. And 100% in print, Units drawn from multiple chapters cannot be mixed in a detachment.
Jon Kissinger
@alphalas
Nov 15 2016 00:23 UTC
No, they're specifically called out as being special in that they DONT count as IF
Earl Bishop
@DrTobogganMD
Nov 15 2016 00:24 UTC
Anyone else want to weigh in on this?
I think that's pretty explicit
Earl Bishop
@DrTobogganMD
Nov 15 2016 00:26 UTC
That is correct.
CF does benefit from the Chapter Tactics rule of IF.
that is not in question here.
blob
That right there, very specifically says if a chapter is in brackets after the rule in the data sheet, the unit cannot be taken in a detachment with any units drawn from another chapter.
Should pedro be CF? Yes.
Is he? No.
Jon Kissinger
@alphalas
Nov 15 2016 00:31 UTC
But Chapter tactics:Crimson Fists don't exist is my point
In the Badab FAQ, novamarines are CT:UM.
CF are CT:IF, period - meaning you can have Lys and Pedro in the same list
Earl Bishop
@DrTobogganMD
Nov 15 2016 00:33 UTC
You can have Lys and pedro in the same list
because they both say IF in the profile
This is not in question
It never was
Ever
Jon Kissinger
@alphalas
Nov 15 2016 00:34 UTC
But you're splitting hairs about a CT that doesn't exist to begin with
Earl Bishop
@DrTobogganMD
Nov 15 2016 00:34 UTC
CF are CF, and benefit from the Chapter Tactics rules for IF get. That is spelled out, plain as day
So you're saying that an imperial fists army can take CT warlord traits?
an army composed entirely of IF units can take warlord traits to a different chapter
Jon Kissinger
@alphalas
Nov 15 2016 00:35 UTC
Theoretically, yes
Earl Bishop
@DrTobogganMD
Nov 15 2016 00:35 UTC
Sorry, no.
If GW says yes, then yes.
Otherwise, no.
Jon Kissinger
@alphalas
Nov 15 2016 00:35 UTC
Show me where CT:CF exist
Earl Bishop
@DrTobogganMD
Nov 15 2016 00:36 UTC
It does not.
Show me where it says successor chapters can take parent chapters Relics.
Jon Kissinger
@alphalas
Nov 15 2016 00:36 UTC
In the passage I cited
"Count as parent chapter"
Earl Bishop
@DrTobogganMD
Nov 15 2016 00:36 UTC
Relics are in no part tied to the "Chapter Tactics rule"
FOR RULES!
Jon Kissinger
@alphalas
Nov 15 2016 00:38 UTC
...how does that work? They're IF relics - which means you have to have CT:IF
Earl Bishop
@DrTobogganMD
Nov 15 2016 00:38 UTC
You have to be an Imperial FIsts Detachment
to be an imperial fists detachment, all units must be pulled from the imperial fists chapter
Jon Kissinger
@alphalas
Nov 15 2016 00:40 UTC
Incorrect
Earl Bishop
@DrTobogganMD
Nov 15 2016 00:40 UTC
What?
It's right in the rules.
Imperial Fists Chapter Tactics per detachment
Earl Bishop
@DrTobogganMD
Nov 15 2016 00:41 UTC
Read the first sentence under "Imperial Fists Detachments"
Jon Kissinger
@alphalas
Nov 15 2016 00:41 UTC
That's the sentence I'm quoting
Earl Bishop
@DrTobogganMD
Nov 15 2016 00:41 UTC
So how are we arguing. To be an IF detachment, you have to have all units pulled from the IF chapter.
Jon Kissinger
@alphalas
Nov 15 2016 00:42 UTC
From the IF chapter TACTICS.
Earl Bishop
@DrTobogganMD
Nov 15 2016 00:42 UTC
No, that is not what it says.
Jon Kissinger
@alphalas
Nov 15 2016 00:42 UTC
It is directly referring to chapter TACTICS and the IF chapter
Earl Bishop
@DrTobogganMD
Nov 15 2016 00:43 UTC
All units with the chapter tactics rule must be pulled from Imperial Fists.
Units with the chapter tactics rule pulled from Crimson Fists are Crimson fists.
Jon Kissinger
@alphalas
Nov 15 2016 00:43 UTC
Ergo, have the what? IF chapter tactics
No, they're not
Earl Bishop
@DrTobogganMD
Nov 15 2016 00:43 UTC
The crimson fists benefit from the RULES of the parent's chapter tactics
Ok, i'm done.
We're getting nowhere.
Change it if you want. I'm not.
Until GW addresses it, it stays in my versions of this cat file.
Earl Bishop
@DrTobogganMD
Nov 15 2016 00:46 UTC
Ok. They use the Ultramarines Chapter Tactics rules.
That doesn't mean they get access to Sicarius
Jon Kissinger
@alphalas
Nov 15 2016 00:50 UTC
You and I are just going to have to agree to disagree then, man - to me RAW is pretty clear that the CT is the end-all, be-all - that wether your IF are blue or yellow doesn't change that they're IF CT
Earl Bishop
@DrTobogganMD
Nov 15 2016 00:51 UTC
Agreed. IMO, it is something that should be in the FAQ. RAW does not complement RAI in my mind.
Jon Kissinger
@alphalas
Nov 15 2016 00:52 UTC
Oh, there's this jem on IF page: https://flic.kr/p/NKT2CS that's the last bit I'll cite - I'm not trying to be an obnoxious ass
Earl Bishop
@DrTobogganMD
Nov 15 2016 00:53 UTC
The Warlord Traits?
Jon Kissinger
@alphalas
Nov 15 2016 00:54 UTC
Yeah - it's the only other bit I could see that applies - but again, it doesn't really address the issue at hand
Earl Bishop
@DrTobogganMD
Nov 15 2016 00:54 UTC
Yea, that one really just address warlord traits
I'm writing up another post for GW.
I'm 1/2 for their FB page, maybe they'll answer this one
Jon Kissinger
@alphalas
Nov 15 2016 00:55 UTC
I can see where you see your reading as hardline RAW - I do see how you can justify it.
Which I think is why I'm trying so hard to argue RAI at this point - because it seems to me like that's what GW was trying to say, but didn't directly
offers virtual hand
Yea, I agree RAI - Pedro should be available to the makeshift CF chapter tactics choice
I try to stay RAW. While we're essentially arbiters of the rules here - I'd rather side on hard RAW until officially addressed
But yea - heated argument, I see both ways as well. Hopefully GW addresses my message.
accepts
You should talk to @OftKilted - He knows how to argue with me too ~.o
Jon Kissinger
@alphalas
Nov 15 2016 01:01 UTC
Watching the thread
Earl Bishop
@DrTobogganMD
Nov 15 2016 01:02 UTC
He's the maintainer of Necrons, haven't seen him in forever though. I took care of the 2.0 conversion while he's gone
We had a row on the meaning of "1 Canoptek Spyder" being able to purchase more for the unit in a Harvest.
Jon Kissinger
@alphalas
Nov 15 2016 01:10 UTC
Didn't they clarify that in the FAQ?
Earl Bishop
@DrTobogganMD
Nov 15 2016 01:10 UTC
yea, this was before that
Jon Kissinger
@alphalas
Nov 15 2016 01:10 UTC
Ah ok
Dirk Bachert
@Thairne
Nov 15 2016 08:15 UTC
@Kohato you could do what I did with obvious RAI vs explicit RAW. I integrated it into the file but added a RAI warning as rule where I explained the circumstance.
I think I still have one in DA where a Chaplain can swap his Crozius Arcanum for another weapon - though it says he can swap his power weapon whereas a Crozius obviously IS one, yet never defined to be one. So if you want to trade your freakin' badge of office for something, you can - but you get a rule that warns you about that
Jon Kissinger
@alphalas
Nov 15 2016 12:12 UTC
Alright all I preordered planetary onslaught as an ePub
Dirk Bachert
@Thairne
Nov 15 2016 12:20 UTC
this gotta be interesting
I never had one of the earlier versions... so I'm quite curious
Jon Kissinger
@alphalas
Nov 15 2016 12:22 UTC
Cities of death and planet strike were both fantastic
Dirk Bachert
@Thairne
Nov 15 2016 12:22 UTC
were those some special rules "maps" like zone mortalis dod?
*did
That's the update for PS they put out same time as mont'ka
CoD was great because terrain (buildings etc) actually had a role and were an important integral part
Made you think more 3D then regular 40k
Dirk Bachert
@Thairne
Nov 15 2016 12:38 UTC
after a quick glance... it adds more SR you can forget after not even having your army USR under full control :D
That's the old CoD
Dirk Bachert
@Thairne
Nov 15 2016 12:42 UTC
looks like some of those rules were rolled into 7th
Jon Kissinger
@alphalas
Nov 15 2016 13:13 UTC
Some yes
But that dates from late 4e
Simon Porter
@FarseerVeraenthis
Nov 15 2016 13:18 UTC
It was due an update... Just in time for 8th :laughing:
Earl Bishop
@DrTobogganMD
Nov 15 2016 14:57 UTC
As per normal GW fashion
@alphalas you tracking the convo between Charles and I on FB?
Jon Kissinger
@alphalas
Nov 15 2016 15:07 UTC
I had seen he commented this morning, but I hadn't followed further
Been a taxi driver and tech adept this morning- what's up?
Earl Bishop
@DrTobogganMD
Nov 15 2016 15:08 UTC
Essentially came to the agreement that a line in AOD states that the relics and tactics listed there can be used in a detachment of a chapter or its successor chapters
So relics in successors - I was wrong, that is 100% allowed.
Jon Kissinger
@alphalas
Nov 15 2016 15:09 UTC
:+1:
Earl Bishop
@DrTobogganMD
Nov 15 2016 15:09 UTC
Still not really clear on characters like pedro though. He believes that because Pedro is listed as a Crimson Fists character in his title he'd not be eligible in an IF detachment
and Lys, as an IF character wouldn't be eligible in a CF detachment
Jon Kissinger
@alphalas
Nov 15 2016 15:10 UTC
Ehhhhh - I'm still old school in that regard
Earl Bishop
@DrTobogganMD
Nov 15 2016 15:10 UTC
He is too actually. Really old school
He brought up that back in 4th there were rules stating you needed to modify the named characters
in order to use them in a successor
Essentially, make a new named character
So i'm going to change the relics (which by proxy, opens up all FW successors to their proginator's relics)
But If I allow Pedro to be used in IF and CF, would that also mean we allow Khan to be used in a Mantis detachment?
Jon Kissinger
@alphalas
Nov 15 2016 15:12 UTC
You could just use the rules, it was just understood that your marneus Calgar in a blood ravens army used all the rules/wargear, it just wasn't THE marneus calgar
Theoretically I'd say yes
Earl Bishop
@DrTobogganMD
Nov 15 2016 15:13 UTC
Well that adds a whole lot more hide checks :/
Balls.
Ok i'll change it ... sometime ...
When I have time today
You've beaten me down sir!
Jon Kissinger
@alphalas
Nov 15 2016 15:16 UTC
I think part of the reason I was erring on that side to begin with is because my local meta is mostly old heads who played rouge trader, and then the youngsters like me who grew up playing against them
I've actually played 6 of the 7 editions out there - when I started I was playing against my brother - the marines v those horrible orks and cardboard standee of a killa kan
Then we got the 3e box with the DE - then I finally upgraded to 4e - about 8 months before 5e dropped lol
So I'm familiar with the legacy rulesets lol
This'll date me - I remember jam dice on the assault cannon
Earl Bishop
@DrTobogganMD
Nov 15 2016 15:21 UTC
haha
I think I started back in 5th
Jon Kissinger
@alphalas
Nov 15 2016 15:24 UTC
9 shots from an assault cannon was glorious though
That's why I love the illastus from 30k - it has the jam rule
Earl Bishop
@DrTobogganMD
Nov 15 2016 15:26 UTC
Haha
There are some 30k things I do love
Like Ordinatus
For when the Titan Legions just can't do things right.
Jon Kissinger
@alphalas
Nov 15 2016 15:27 UTC
Yup lol
I have a friend that has a ordinatus company
It's glorious and frightening
Earl Bishop
@DrTobogganMD
Nov 15 2016 15:28 UTC
Jesus, Did he play nothing but floorhammer?
In an Ordinatus Company ... are the troops just Ordinatus Minori?
"I'll take a unit of 5 Ulators"
Jon Kissinger
@alphalas
Nov 15 2016 15:34 UTC
Lol he is the tread-head to end all tread-heads
Earl Bishop
@DrTobogganMD
Nov 15 2016 15:34 UTC
Full Disclosure (I really really really really want a Ulator)
I think those things look awesome
Jon Kissinger
@alphalas
Nov 15 2016 15:35 UTC
He has an ordinatus company, a baneblade-pattern company, and I think is starting a malcador-pattern company. He use to have a full Russ armored company
Earl Bishop
@DrTobogganMD
Nov 15 2016 15:36 UTC
My next army will likely be a Russ Company flanked by a magnetized baneblade.
Jon Kissinger
@alphalas
Nov 15 2016 15:37 UTC
Russ companies are legit, especially from Cadia
The FW armored co needs updated to be competitive
Earl Bishop
@DrTobogganMD
Nov 15 2016 15:38 UTC
I've always stayed away from FW as much as I can (I don't really care for resin models) so that's no issue for me.
Jon Kissinger
@alphalas
Nov 15 2016 15:38 UTC
The only real good thing it's got going for itself is the commissar tank, the command tank not needing a wingman, and beast hunter shells
Earl Bishop
@DrTobogganMD
Nov 15 2016 15:39 UTC
I've just wanted an all tank army. And AM has the Baneblade. Anvil Strike force for Space Marines does not
Jon Kissinger
@alphalas
Nov 15 2016 15:40 UTC
Before Cadia dropped, FW was still the way to go - it just sucked that all the russes were the old cost (aka LRMBT was the cheapest tank at 150)
Oh I hear you
Simon Porter
@FarseerVeraenthis
Nov 15 2016 16:25 UTC
I had those plastic orks and the cardboard killer kan too...
Earl Bishop
@DrTobogganMD
Nov 15 2016 17:14 UTC
I love 1d4chan sometimes.
Jon Kissinger
@alphalas
Nov 15 2016 17:15 UTC
indeed - why this time?
Earl Bishop
@DrTobogganMD
Nov 15 2016 17:15 UTC
"Whereas most infantry weapons go DAKKA DAKKA DAKKA for hours on end without concerns for ammunition. The Punisher goes BRRRRRRT for half a minute"
Jon Kissinger
@alphalas
Nov 15 2016 17:15 UTC
heh
Jon Kissinger
@alphalas
Nov 15 2016 17:21 UTC
original(1).jpg
mostly TT ready
Earl Bishop
@DrTobogganMD
Nov 15 2016 17:22 UTC
awesome
Jon Kissinger
@alphalas
Nov 15 2016 17:30 UTC
kindof amazing how much he dwarfs the GW knight
IMG_0123(1).JPG
Earl Bishop
@DrTobogganMD
Nov 15 2016 17:30 UTC
yea, Cadecus knights are pretty big
I really want a lancer to complement my 3 knights
Jon Kissinger
@alphalas
Nov 15 2016 17:31 UTC
i want one of each caestus
Earl Bishop
@DrTobogganMD
Nov 15 2016 17:31 UTC
I'll eventually be painting them as Lords of Cinder and a Lancer would be a perfect Yorm
Jon Kissinger
@alphalas
Nov 15 2016 17:33 UTC
atrapos, lancer, castagator, and aceron
i kinda want the styriz and magera too
Earl Bishop
@DrTobogganMD
Nov 15 2016 17:34 UTC
I always liked Magera's shoulders
his claw thing is cool too
God damn I wish I was artistic
This shit is beautiful
Jon Kissinger
@alphalas
Nov 15 2016 17:35 UTC
indeed
Dirk Bachert
@Thairne
Nov 15 2016 18:44 UTC
@Kohato any news from jon on the modifier on shared entry thing? It's getting really really annoying...
Will Pattison
@GenWilhelm
Nov 15 2016 18:45 UTC
@Thairne are you talking about #2782 ?
Dirk Bachert
@Thairne
Nov 15 2016 18:46 UTC
yep, that's the last issue
Will Pattison
@GenWilhelm
Nov 15 2016 18:46 UTC
you haven't checked "all child selections", so its only looking in the root selection
Dirk Bachert
@Thairne
Nov 15 2016 18:46 UTC
some modifiers, when hiding or doing other stuff, just do not work and always seem to be considered false
it is?
it is.
well that is not caused by the bug but my own incompetence.
Will Pattison
@GenWilhelm
Nov 15 2016 18:50 UTC
the only bug ive run into so far is shared entries not being able to check their force type
Dirk Bachert
@Thairne
Nov 15 2016 18:51 UTC
yeah that's the one I was referring to. Was a bit to quick on the draw
Earl Bishop
@DrTobogganMD
Nov 15 2016 18:52 UTC
nopers.
Dirk Bachert
@Thairne
Nov 15 2016 18:57 UTC
time to fix the sergeants!
and damn.
Dirk Bachert
@Thairne
Nov 15 2016 19:12 UTC
things were learned. Files were improved. Thanks @GenWilhelm!
Simon Porter
@FarseerVeraenthis
Nov 15 2016 19:15 UTC
Also, how long does it take for committed changes to flow through to battlescribe? I made some updates last night and I've deleted and redownloaded the data on my phone and the changes still don't show...
Dirk Bachert
@Thairne
Nov 15 2016 19:17 UTC
That's because noone released them yet.
Basically you commit and they are there for those that cloned the files locally. For the public to get the however, someone has to draft a release, write the patchnotes (or have them generated) and that then publishes it. Appspot takes few hours to pick that up, but then it's out for official downloading
Earl Bishop
@DrTobogganMD
Nov 15 2016 19:19 UTC
^. We don't push releases after every commit
Github only allows so many pulls per day
if we exceed that. Appspot dies for 24 hours
that goes for all repos here, not just 40k
flakpanda
@flakpanda
Nov 15 2016 19:20 UTC
be aware, that appspot pulls the latest releases every 4 hours
Earl Bishop
@DrTobogganMD
Nov 15 2016 19:20 UTC
^
flakpanda
@flakpanda
Nov 15 2016 19:20 UTC
for me at CDT its Noon, 4,8, ect...
so ill try to time a release about 30 mins before hand, otherwise ill wait
Simon Porter
@FarseerVeraenthis
Nov 15 2016 19:25 UTC
Righto, that's cool, I take it only a couple of people can release things properly...?
Amadeusz Sadowski
@amis92
Nov 15 2016 19:27 UTC
Any member can do that, few actually read wiki and do.
Earl Bishop
@DrTobogganMD
Nov 15 2016 19:27 UTC
^
flakpanda
@flakpanda
Nov 15 2016 19:27 UTC
we men dont read instructions /s
Simon Porter
@FarseerVeraenthis
Nov 15 2016 19:29 UTC
Well, I did read it but I didn't realise just anyone could actually do it so I didn't really take it in too much...
flakpanda
@flakpanda
Nov 15 2016 19:30 UTC
…i just realized my last release i forgot to make the commit first :S
i released nothing basicly
Earl Bishop
@DrTobogganMD
Nov 15 2016 19:33 UTC
gj lol
Simon Porter
@FarseerVeraenthis
Nov 15 2016 19:34 UTC
Hehehe! Oops! So when one person throws a release, does that release everyone's commits...?
flakpanda
@flakpanda
Nov 15 2016 19:35 UTC
yeas
well, i commited it now :P at least it will go out in the next release now
Earl Bishop
@DrTobogganMD
Nov 15 2016 19:38 UTC
Your release released thigs flak.
Just not your things.
flakpanda
@flakpanda
Nov 15 2016 19:38 UTC
i know
Earl Bishop
@DrTobogganMD
Nov 15 2016 19:38 UTC
:smile:
flakpanda
@flakpanda
Nov 15 2016 19:38 UTC
yeah
exactly, lol
Earl Bishop
@DrTobogganMD
Nov 15 2016 19:38 UTC
Just chalk it up to being a team player
Simon Porter
@FarseerVeraenthis
Nov 15 2016 19:38 UTC
Fab, so basically no-one has done a release since last night...
Earl Bishop
@DrTobogganMD
Nov 15 2016 19:39 UTC
One of us usually pushes one once a day
flakpanda
@flakpanda
Nov 15 2016 19:39 UTC
idk, whenever it says last
Earl Bishop
@DrTobogganMD
Nov 15 2016 19:39 UTC
I'll throw one up now unless anyone's working on a file at the moment
I'm not gonna get time to work on SM today
flakpanda
@flakpanda
Nov 15 2016 19:39 UTC
to bad there isnt an auto-release
Amadeusz Sadowski
@amis92
Nov 15 2016 19:39 UTC
I'm working on it :)
flakpanda
@flakpanda
Nov 15 2016 19:39 UTC
oh, nice
Earl Bishop
@DrTobogganMD
Nov 15 2016 19:39 UTC
Noice.
flakpanda
@flakpanda
Nov 15 2016 19:39 UTC
auto release at 4am every night would be cool
Earl Bishop
@DrTobogganMD
Nov 15 2016 19:40 UTC
Eh, time really doesn't matter
we have players around the world (and maintainers)
but yea, auto release would be ballin
flakpanda
@flakpanda
Nov 15 2016 19:40 UTC
no, i know
Amadeusz Sadowski
@amis92
Nov 15 2016 19:40 UTC
you do realise we have totally different time zones
flakpanda
@flakpanda
Nov 15 2016 19:40 UTC
yeah
Amadeusz Sadowski
@amis92
Nov 15 2016 19:40 UTC
so 4am what zone? :P
flakpanda
@flakpanda
Nov 15 2016 19:40 UTC
cdt
Earl Bishop
@DrTobogganMD
Nov 15 2016 19:41 UTC
Contrary to the belief of a short blonde orange, America isn't the only thing int he world :p
flakpanda
@flakpanda
Nov 15 2016 19:41 UTC
lol
yeah
most players are american or western european i would think
Amadeusz Sadowski
@amis92
Nov 15 2016 19:42 UTC
I guess. Plus Australia, but no-one knows how they walk upside down anyway
Simon Porter
@FarseerVeraenthis
Nov 15 2016 19:42 UTC
Awesomeness :smile:
Earl Bishop
@DrTobogganMD
Nov 15 2016 19:42 UTC
There ya go @FarseerVeraenthis - check your data this evening, you should get your changes.
Australia can still afford to play 40k?
I've seen the AUD prices.
That shit's insane.
Simon Porter
@FarseerVeraenthis
Nov 15 2016 19:43 UTC
Fabulous :smile: this group is cool
flakpanda
@flakpanda
Nov 15 2016 19:43 UTC
i guess auto release at 12am gmt would just make sense for a game played worldwide
Amadeusz Sadowski
@amis92
Nov 15 2016 19:43 UTC
If they walk upside down, I believe they can do anything
flakpanda
@flakpanda
Nov 15 2016 19:43 UTC
upsidedown is relative
Amadeusz Sadowski
@amis92
Nov 15 2016 19:44 UTC
@flakpanda it's still a long way, but I was rather thinking of some timeout since last commit, and possibility of triggering a release manually
Simon Porter
@FarseerVeraenthis
Nov 15 2016 19:44 UTC
Also, auto release might be a bit of an arse if people were working on the file at the time.. Wouldn't it?
Amadeusz Sadowski
@amis92
Nov 15 2016 19:44 UTC
no, why?
Amadeusz Sadowski
@amis92
Nov 15 2016 19:45 UTC
haha
Earl Bishop
@DrTobogganMD
Nov 15 2016 19:45 UTC
Nah, wouldn't be an issue at all
flakpanda
@flakpanda
Nov 15 2016 19:45 UTC
^lol
Earl Bishop
@DrTobogganMD
Nov 15 2016 19:45 UTC
The only conflict would be if someone hit commit at the same millisecond as the release hit
Simon Porter
@FarseerVeraenthis
Nov 15 2016 19:45 UTC
Righto, just checking...
That's fairly unlikely...
Earl Bishop
@DrTobogganMD
Nov 15 2016 19:46 UTC
Exactly. And not an uncommon exception test either
Earl Bishop
@DrTobogganMD
Nov 15 2016 19:46 UTC
I still love those movies
flakpanda
@flakpanda
Nov 15 2016 19:47 UTC
you shouldn’t need a long timeout since last commit.
Amadeusz Sadowski
@amis92
Nov 15 2016 19:47 UTC
that'd rather be an option for all those unmaintained repos we have on bsdata
Earl Bishop
@DrTobogganMD
Nov 15 2016 19:47 UTC
I suppose auto release would be an issue if someone set their git to auto commit at 00:00gmt as well ... But whoever does that, shame on you.
Amadeusz Sadowski
@amis92
Nov 15 2016 19:47 UTC
it'd connect with a feature I'd planned to also auto-merge on timeout anon pull requests
flakpanda
@flakpanda
Nov 15 2016 19:48 UTC
yeah, if you auto commit, you are hurting yourself and potentially others
Earl Bishop
@DrTobogganMD
Nov 15 2016 19:48 UTC
that'd be neat as well
it'd help out the less monitored repos for sure
Amadeusz Sadowski
@amis92
Nov 15 2016 19:48 UTC
so that a community can actually update files even if there's no maintainer around
yeah, for 40k it'd probably never get to trigger
Earl Bishop
@DrTobogganMD
Nov 15 2016 19:54 UTC
Oh they do that.
Someone just wants a show
Jon Kissinger
@alphalas
Nov 15 2016 19:55 UTC
Hey @amis92 can you kill my pull request that's erroring?
flakpanda
@flakpanda
Nov 15 2016 19:55 UTC
i know, just hopped over to the subreddit to see if anything is going on
Jon Kissinger
@alphalas
Nov 15 2016 19:55 UTC
I'm just going to start over with it
Amadeusz Sadowski
@amis92
Nov 15 2016 19:56 UTC
@alphalas all I can do
flakpanda
@flakpanda
Nov 15 2016 19:56 UTC
i am a bit interesting in the guy asking about the kindle issue tho
Earl Bishop
@DrTobogganMD
Nov 15 2016 19:59 UTC
He's likely talking about FireOS
Jon Kissinger
@alphalas
Nov 15 2016 19:59 UTC
If I had a kindle I'd check it out - I have a feeling the problem is with amazon
flakpanda
@flakpanda
Nov 15 2016 20:00 UTC
yeah, i know he is
Earl Bishop
@DrTobogganMD
Nov 15 2016 20:00 UTC
Which is known to have issues with Android apps not designed for it
Jon Kissinger
@alphalas
Nov 15 2016 20:00 UTC
I have 2 rooted nooks running marshmallow and BS runs on them lol
Low memory mode though
Thanks @amis92 - I'll try to have the file ready to pull tonight
Simon Porter
@FarseerVeraenthis
Nov 15 2016 20:57 UTC
@Thairne you've made a friend :smile: I have to say it is nice when people log back in and say thank you when you fix things...
Earl Bishop
@DrTobogganMD
Nov 15 2016 20:58 UTC
You mean you don't prefer the people swearing off of battlescribe forever because it is now second only to hitler?
Simon Porter
@FarseerVeraenthis
Nov 15 2016 20:59 UTC
hahahah!! well, to a certain extent, that's why I'm here - Id rather have a go at fixing something than just cry and whinge that it's broken...
"how hard can it be" <-- well, a little tricky to begin with but not too difficult once you get into the swing of things...
Dirk Bachert
@Thairne
Nov 15 2016 21:22 UTC
well yeah that guy seems to be pretty up to date.. after all he cloned the repo for faster access :P
Earl Bishop
@DrTobogganMD
Nov 15 2016 21:31 UTC
Hey @alphalas - I do all my BS work on desktop so i'm converting your epubs to pdf. Do you want copies when i'm done?
flakpanda
@flakpanda
Nov 15 2016 21:31 UTC
doesnt abode read epubs?
Earl Bishop
@DrTobogganMD
Nov 15 2016 21:32 UTC
If it does, not these :/
blob
Works fine after I run it through a little converter I use though
flakpanda
@flakpanda
Nov 15 2016 21:32 UTC
….maybe they have two programs and acrobat doesnt read it
i remember them having one
Earl Bishop
@DrTobogganMD
Nov 15 2016 21:33 UTC
Basic reader might, not sure
I need acrobat for work so I just use it over reader.
Simon Porter
@FarseerVeraenthis
Nov 15 2016 21:34 UTC
Adobe do have an ePub reader, but from what I read it is trash... I found another one online - if I was on my main computer I'd tell you the name
flakpanda
@flakpanda
Nov 15 2016 21:34 UTC
just checked, its adobe digital editions
Jon Kissinger
@alphalas
Nov 15 2016 21:34 UTC
I know Firefox does with an extension, as backasswards as that sounds
flakpanda
@flakpanda
Nov 15 2016 21:34 UTC
yeah, reviews look less than stelar
i use ibooks
Earl Bishop
@DrTobogganMD
Nov 15 2016 21:35 UTC
No big - conversion takes like 5 seconds. Keeps all my files uniform extensions too
raptor1770
@raptor1770
Nov 15 2016 21:35 UTC
Someone please tell me there is an undo button in Data Editor
Earl Bishop
@DrTobogganMD
Nov 15 2016 21:35 UTC
Hah.
raptor1770
@raptor1770
Nov 15 2016 21:35 UTC
:(
Earl Bishop
@DrTobogganMD
Nov 15 2016 21:35 UTC
You're hillarious.
Undo
flakpanda
@flakpanda
Nov 15 2016 21:35 UTC
a regular comedian here boys
raptor1770
@raptor1770
Nov 15 2016 21:35 UTC
:'(
flakpanda
@flakpanda
Nov 15 2016 21:36 UTC
what did you do?
Simon Porter
@FarseerVeraenthis
Nov 15 2016 21:36 UTC
oh dear, what did you break??
raptor1770
@raptor1770
Nov 15 2016 21:36 UTC
broke the bolter ID
Its ok I only lost about 10 min of work
flakpanda
@flakpanda
Nov 15 2016 21:36 UTC
just not save it and reopen?
Earl Bishop
@DrTobogganMD
Nov 15 2016 21:36 UTC
There is no undo. That'd be a very large number of lines to save in some cases
in most cases actually :/
raptor1770
@raptor1770
Nov 15 2016 21:36 UTC
yeahhhhh makes sense
Earl Bishop
@DrTobogganMD
Nov 15 2016 21:37 UTC
Bolter is a GST profile now I thought
Simon Porter
@FarseerVeraenthis
Nov 15 2016 21:37 UTC
and Chrome reads some ePubs, used to work a treat until Black Library started using ePub3 files - now none of my new Codecies work... (i.e. Deathwatch and Kill Team Rules)
Earl Bishop
@DrTobogganMD
Nov 15 2016 21:37 UTC
Should be able to just link to it
flakpanda
@flakpanda
Nov 15 2016 21:37 UTC
to be fair tho, ive copy/cut/paste/undo/redo in android studio with a large chuck of code and its been fine
raptor1770
@raptor1770
Nov 15 2016 21:37 UTC
i broke the profile link
Earl Bishop
@DrTobogganMD
Nov 15 2016 21:37 UTC
Ohh
raptor1770
@raptor1770
Nov 15 2016 21:37 UTC
yeah
for some reason there is no shared entry group for combi weapons so im making one
pressed ctrl-v when i shoulda ctrl-c on bolter id
woops