These are chat archives for BSData/wh40k

19th
Dec 2016
Troy Graber
@tag8833
Dec 19 2016 00:05
One interesting thing is that there are 1 different profiles for needle pistols in the book. Evesor has no ap, while inquisition is ap6.
flakpanda
@flakpanda
Dec 19 2016 00:19
@tag8833 you know that C:IA doesnt replace the Inquitition Codex
Just that those formations in C:IA are all from one force
Troy Graber
@tag8833
Dec 19 2016 00:27
I don't see a reason for it to exist if it doesn't replace the old codex. But we will have to wait for GW to clarify for sure.
flakpanda
@flakpanda
Dec 19 2016 00:28
There is an “unofficial” email someone shared about it. But you cant look at it from a comp pov, but a fluff pov. the nuances make sense having everything be faction: imperial agents.
Troy Graber
@tag8833
Dec 19 2016 00:34
Also the "official" facebook page said it does replace the SoB. So lots of confusion.
flakpanda
@flakpanda
Dec 19 2016 00:34
link?
Troy Graber
@tag8833
Dec 19 2016 00:54
The Imperial Agents book presents a revised and updated version of the Adepta Sororitas army list. It is indeed intended to replace the digital version.
I'm on my phone. Figured out how to take a screenshot, but can't figure out how to share it. The text got pasted above.
Jon Kissinger
@alphalas
Dec 19 2016 01:16
@Owlsbane got a sec to try to break SoB?
Dirk Bachert
@Thairne
Dec 19 2016 08:35
did someone brake the repo? I'm getting a "failed to sync this branch" errormsg..
Will Pattison
@GenWilhelm
Dec 19 2016 10:16
Seems to be working fine for me. It might be your github client not liking something, @Thairne.
Jon Kissinger
@alphalas
Dec 19 2016 10:21
I was having problems with conflicts with sisters last night - had to scrap my quick fix of Celestine and addition of cannoness veridyan
Dirk Bachert
@Thairne
Dec 19 2016 10:29
im not having any changes locally. I could sync my private pc at home yesterday, work seems to have a problem however. Maybe IT blocked some ports or something...
Owlsbane
@Owlsbane
Dec 19 2016 12:34
@alphalas Can give it a go. Not familiar with the codex so ymmv.
Owlsbane
@Owlsbane
Dec 19 2016 17:09
Anyone still in need of an epub3-capable reader, try out Azardi. Just ran into it and it seems to do okay with GW epubs. Available on a wide range of platforms.
Jon Kissinger
@alphalas
Dec 19 2016 19:06
Thanks @Thairne !
Simon Porter
@FarseerVeraenthis
Dec 19 2016 19:49
@alphalas are you working on the Imperial Agents CAT?
and @Owlsbane Azardi is the rader I use - it is basic but functional :-)
Jon Kissinger
@alphalas
Dec 19 2016 20:00
There isn't a IA cat
What do you mean?
Simon Porter
@FarseerVeraenthis
Dec 19 2016 20:01
sorry, I meant the Inquisition CAT... that's where you're adding the rules from C:IA isn't it??
zopha
@zopha
Dec 19 2016 21:03
Don't know if you want to count Heresy stuff but FW uses Sunder a few times and just applies it to failed armour pen rolls.
Simon Porter
@FarseerVeraenthis
Dec 19 2016 21:03
hmmm... I'll probably update it then... stupid FW editors...
Jon Kissinger
@alphalas
Dec 19 2016 21:06
One of the many places lol
No I am not actively in it - looking to insert the DW vet squad into it?
Simon Porter
@FarseerVeraenthis
Dec 19 2016 21:09
Yes, but I'm beating through the list from owlsbane atm so I might not get to it this evening...
(and thank you @zopha )
Jon Kissinger
@alphalas
Dec 19 2016 21:10
:+1:
Trying to bug fix SoB and update GK
zopha
@zopha
Dec 19 2016 21:16
Slowly learning all the FW rules. If there's a crazy FW rule, they're bound to use it in HH.
Simon Porter
@FarseerVeraenthis
Dec 19 2016 21:18
HH - the land that time forgot...
zopha
@zopha
Dec 19 2016 21:24
Yeap, pretty empty in that repo now. Feels like I've been left to turn off the lights and shut the door. Is there etiquette for that kind of stuff? It's getting out of date and some of the big stuff doesn't work well (lords of war).
No activity except for me for the last 2 - 3 weeks and I think I have a good idea how BS data editor works now. I have my first pull request in but I think I'm the only one around to look over it and merge it.
Simon Porter
@FarseerVeraenthis
Dec 19 2016 21:32
sounds lonely...
if git reckons you can merge it with no conflicts then just go ahead...
zopha
@zopha
Dec 19 2016 21:34
Yeap, think I'll just plough on forward and see where it takes me. 1k sons and Wolves arrive in Jan/Feb. Better get the welcome mat ready for them.
I've played around with merges on my own fork and tried to manually resolve conflicts. At least I didn't put much time in to those changes :)
Simon Porter
@FarseerVeraenthis
Dec 19 2016 21:45
uhuh, best to avoid conflicts...
Jon Kissinger
@alphalas
Dec 19 2016 21:50
Alright, here goes the fixes on sisters -.-
Simon Porter
@FarseerVeraenthis
Dec 19 2016 21:53
:+1:
Simon Porter
@FarseerVeraenthis
Dec 19 2016 21:59
is there an easy way to add the veterans to the Inquisition CAT? Can I give the copy and paste fairy a cuddle somehow??
Simon Porter
@FarseerVeraenthis
Dec 19 2016 22:06
I'm off to bed, so @alphalas you can go wild on the Inquisition CAT if you have time :smile:
Owlsbane
@Owlsbane
Dec 19 2016 22:19
What kind of force org. is Spearhead? If I take that with an Eldar Craftworld force it doesn't give me any restrictions or requirements that I should follow.
Also, where are the force org.'s that get shown decided? Is that in the cat file of the chosen Force?
Amadeusz Sadowski
@amis92
Dec 19 2016 22:25
Spearhead is a very old supplement focusing on armored groups
Jon Kissinger
@alphalas
Dec 19 2016 22:26
SoB up, GK then Inq
Amadeusz Sadowski
@amis92
Dec 19 2016 22:26
it had a special kind of formations and CAD-like limits, but a little different
Owlsbane
@Owlsbane
Dec 19 2016 22:27
Doesn't seem to enforce anything, so any idea why it is included?
Jon Kissinger
@alphalas
Dec 19 2016 22:28
because it is an old (but still suppoerted) detatchment typew that offers special rules over the cad
probably just need constraints fixed.
Owlsbane
@Owlsbane
Dec 19 2016 22:30
kk. I'll put up an issue then, and one asking for the AM Cadian Battle Group to be removed from the Eldar force orgs, lol
Jon Kissinger
@alphalas
Dec 19 2016 22:31
ther's already one for Cadians
its not in the cats, it's in the GST.
Owlsbane
@Owlsbane
Dec 19 2016 22:31
This one shows up when your force is Eldar though ;)
Jon Kissinger
@alphalas
Dec 19 2016 22:31
yes, it will
someone needs to take it out of the GST
which there is a bug rep for already
Owlsbane
@Owlsbane
Dec 19 2016 22:32
Ah, I see, sorry, that was an answer to my own question, duh!
Jon Kissinger
@alphalas
Dec 19 2016 22:32
if a detachment is in the GST, it will appear in ALL cats as an option.
there is already a bugrep for it to be moved into the AM cat from the GST - low on my priority list right now.
Owlsbane
@Owlsbane
Dec 19 2016 22:33
All good.
Jon Kissinger
@alphalas
Dec 19 2016 22:34
technically that sisters bugrep should have been low too, but well since i just did it it annoyed me that it was fresh with bugs.
Owlsbane
@Owlsbane
Dec 19 2016 22:35
They're kind of a hot item, so... can't hurt anyway.