These are chat archives for BSData/wh40k

16th
Jan 2017
Jon Kissinger
@alphalas
Jan 16 2017 00:00
Hey guys - coteaz in the supermega cadia meta detachment
That is all
Jon Kissinger
@alphalas
Jan 16 2017 03:56
Hey @Thairne - I found an interesting bug. If you choose an unbound IK detachment, it doesn't show the LoW slot
Hence no knights
Simon Porter
@FarseerVeraenthis
Jan 16 2017 07:22
Hahaha! That is quite funny :smile:
Dirk Bachert
@Thairne
Jan 16 2017 08:20
Interesting... the ID's differ between the unbound LOW and the other detachments
flakpanda
@flakpanda
Jan 16 2017 08:21
Probably want linked properly?
Dirk Bachert
@Thairne
Jan 16 2017 08:21
Not hard to fix, just a bit confusing
Simon Porter
@FarseerVeraenthis
Jan 16 2017 09:15
Anyone fancy pushing a release?
Dirk Bachert
@Thairne
Jan 16 2017 09:27
wait a minute or two, I'm about to copy&paste on the cadia stuff in the gst
Simon Porter
@FarseerVeraenthis
Jan 16 2017 09:30
That's OK, you can do it when you're finished :smile:
Dirk Bachert
@Thairne
Jan 16 2017 09:45
wait what? ^^
Ah heck...
what was the syntax for github drafting the release notes itself?
Simon Porter
@FarseerVeraenthis
Jan 16 2017 09:48
stupid phone... anyway, I just copy and paste the link from the previous release and update the tag numbers...
Dirk Bachert
@Thairne
Jan 16 2017 09:48
ah yes, i see
Simon Porter
@FarseerVeraenthis
Jan 16 2017 09:48
:smile:
Simon Porter
@FarseerVeraenthis
Jan 16 2017 09:58
further to the discussion about Fall of Cadia, what exactly is required to be added to the various Armies of The Imperium CAT's that are affected??
Dirk Bachert
@Thairne
Jan 16 2017 10:00
relics
HQs
Simon Porter
@FarseerVeraenthis
Jan 16 2017 10:10
ah, right, the link to the entry in the GST, yes? so they show up and actually can be used...
Dirk Bachert
@Thairne
Jan 16 2017 10:12
basically... yes
easy for the most part, rather difficult in some CATs
Simon Porter
@FarseerVeraenthis
Jan 16 2017 10:20
righto, that's cool
I'll have to make time to have a proper read through the FoC stuff first so I have at least some understanding of what to implement and where :smile:
and then get to the CAT's...
your release seems to have worked btw :+1:
Jon Kissinger
@alphalas
Jan 16 2017 10:53
But seriously though guys, coteaz is probably going to be an auto-take in the castellans of the imperium detachment
Simon Porter
@FarseerVeraenthis
Jan 16 2017 11:05
Coteaz?
Jon Kissinger
@alphalas
Jan 16 2017 11:06
Inquisitor
His rule lord of Formosa is the reason why
Jon Kissinger
@alphalas
Jan 16 2017 11:15
Oh shit, never mind
Thank god
Ignore me - I forgot he lost it in the c:inq update
Simon Porter
@FarseerVeraenthis
Jan 16 2017 11:16
Super I'm glad that resolved itself
(what is the Lord of formosa rule...?)
Jon Kissinger
@alphalas
Jan 16 2017 11:17
Basically it was a rule that said all non-vehicle units in the detachment with him had ObSec
Oh god it's in c:ia
Not c:inq
So i was right the first time
Simon Porter
@FarseerVeraenthis
Jan 16 2017 11:29
Aha, yes, good point... How Do I include him in my Deathwatch... Hmmm...
Jon Kissinger
@alphalas
Jan 16 2017 11:29
Lol
Can't really - but CoI (castellans of imperium) makes it possible
6 obsec assault centurions and 6 obsec dev centurions in one list, 1 detachment even
Simon Porter
@FarseerVeraenthis
Jan 16 2017 11:32
makes note to read Cadia
Jon Kissinger
@alphalas
Jan 16 2017 11:32
Plus deep-striking tempestus
That all recycles on a 6+
5*
Simon Porter
@FarseerVeraenthis
Jan 16 2017 11:33
Uhuh, it's the detachment thing that limits the craziness to a certain extent...
But yes, that sounds a little crazy...
For anyone questioning what I'm talking about
Simon Porter
@FarseerVeraenthis
Jan 16 2017 11:47
Righto, I'll stand down then, no Deathwatch in that detachment...
No ObSec deep striking individual terminators or vanguard Veterans... No ObSec for Deathwatch in general...
Jon Kissinger
@alphalas
Jan 16 2017 11:49
lmao
@tag8833 this actually gives you back your old inq list mostly
Dirk Bachert
@Thairne
Jan 16 2017 13:38
I have a sinking feeling there will again be nothing for Dark Angels... le sigh do not break the circle.
zopha
@zopha
Jan 16 2017 13:39
Might be a name change incoming, it mentions Aeldari..
Dirk Bachert
@Thairne
Jan 16 2017 13:39
maybe thats just what the eldar called themselves before the fall
zopha
@zopha
Jan 16 2017 13:39
Yeah, this looks like the Eldar... Aeldari one.
Hopefully.
Jon Kissinger
@alphalas
Jan 16 2017 14:33
Probably just what they're calling combined forces - so yeah probably what they called themselves pre-fall
Simon Porter
@FarseerVeraenthis
Jan 16 2017 14:45
starts saving money and thinking of ways to accrue more brownie points
James
@skonk
Jan 16 2017 15:44
@cartag quick question; this may be me doing something wrong, but Iron Warriors have a couple of Artifacts that are Warpsmith only but I'm not seeing them as selectable options for Warpsmiths. Are these in there and I'm just missing something?
cartag
@cartag
Jan 16 2017 15:52
If you know which ones, post an issue. I'll look when I get home.
James
@skonk
Jan 16 2017 15:54
Will do; thanks.
Will Pattison
@GenWilhelm
Jan 16 2017 15:55
@skonk the Mechatendril ones are under the "Mechatendril" entry, if that's what you're looking for
James
@skonk
Jan 16 2017 15:56
yeh its the 2 mechatendril upgrades
ah yeh i see now
was me doing it wrong :)
Will Pattison
@GenWilhelm
Jan 16 2017 15:56
happens to the best of us :P
James
@skonk
Jan 16 2017 15:58
heh
I assume someone is currently having an absolute nightmare trying to figure out how to handle that new cadia book.
Dirk Bachert
@Thairne
Jan 16 2017 16:00
I had.
And I figured it all out :P
I'm currently mulling if I really want to jump the loops and enable Imperial Knights to have the Arcana and Ecclessiarchy Relics...
James
@skonk
Jan 16 2017 16:01
ah
:)
Dirk Bachert
@Thairne
Jan 16 2017 16:02
battlescribe bug prevents implementation though
James
@skonk
Jan 16 2017 16:03
Ah right, hopefully that gets fixed for you then. It just looked like that strange mixed faction cad thing would be a real pain to implement.
Simon Porter
@FarseerVeraenthis
Jan 16 2017 16:03
All hail the mighty @Thairne
Will Pattison
@GenWilhelm
Jan 16 2017 16:04
"How can we fuck with those guys at BSData?" - GW, probably
Dirk Bachert
@Thairne
Jan 16 2017 16:04
now i'm trying to think of a way to make those 2 relics that replace weapons not blow up the constraints tenfold...
hm we cannot net condition groups...
anyone mind having a thought?
That's how it looks and it works. However the QUantum thingy and the Blade thingy replace weapons. So I would need to exempt them from that which would increase the conditions required by.. like 8.. per HQ since modifiers for default values are still not a thing.
grafik.png
checking for every relic except for those 2 would suck... which would mean...
currently it is do if. What if it is dont do if...
Dirk Bachert
@Thairne
Jan 16 2017 16:09
god. that would require a redo of the entire relic logic times 8 or something.
Will Pattison
@GenWilhelm
Jan 16 2017 16:11
what new relics did DA get access to? I have seen almost nothing of the Cadia book
Dirk Bachert
@Thairne
Jan 16 2017 16:11
the same as everyone
the arcana mechanicum and the ecclessiarchy relics
as soon as you take cawl or celestine
Jon Kissinger
@alphalas
Jan 16 2017 16:12
I'll try to get Cel into AS shortly
Dirk Bachert
@Thairne
Jan 16 2017 16:12
Got it!
It's really bad style, but it works
I just negate it by decrementing if sucha relic is selected
grafik.png
nope, didnt get it. Something breaks in that conditional mess. Need a break and get my mind of it.