These are chat archives for BSData/wh40k

12th
Oct 2017
Jon Kissinger
@alphalas
Oct 12 2017 00:34
:shipit:
if you want something released, push it now :)
Joe Beddoe
@CrusherJoe
Oct 12 2017 00:53
dooooo eeeeeeeeeet
Stus67
@Stus67
Oct 12 2017 05:21
Astra Militarum not updated yet?
Iain Launchbury
@Mad-Spy
Oct 12 2017 06:00
@Stus67, it was released last night so should be up on Appspot "soon" if it's not already.
Dirk Bachert
@Thairne
Oct 12 2017 07:33
ahahaha tis is funny... Not only did DA never get a supplement, now other armys get a SECOND start collecting before DA gets even ONE....
HAHA!
HA!
Ha...
cries
Will Pattison
@GenWilhelm
Oct 12 2017 08:08
i like how in one release the IG file went from v47 to v69
WindstormSCR
@WindstormSCR
Oct 12 2017 08:19
I just want the fire prism to not suck balls anymore
they fixed the LRBT, which gives me a little hope
just because I like how the paint works on mine, and they're not even worth fielding
James Burton
@TrueBlueDesign_twitter
Oct 12 2017 08:35
Anyone have a link to the IG update it’s still not live for me ...
Will Pattison
@GenWilhelm
Oct 12 2017 08:39
looks like it hasnt been picked up by appspot yet. if you can't wait a few hours for it to refresh, you'll have to manually download the data direct from the repo
James Burton
@TrueBlueDesign_twitter
Oct 12 2017 08:39
I’m happy to wait no worries 😁 thanks for the reply
Will Pattison
@GenWilhelm
Oct 12 2017 08:39
:+1:
Jon Kissinger
@alphalas
Oct 12 2017 09:13
@GenWilhelm breaks out mansplaining voice actually, none of those things should hide because in a Imperium/AM detachment you can totally take all the different relics
Also, no, a character can only take 1 relic, period
Will Pattison
@GenWilhelm
Oct 12 2017 09:14
yes, but in a mordian detachment, i shouldnt have access to tallarn relics
and i dont think anyone has said you should be able to take more than 1 relic on a character
Jon Kissinger
@alphalas
Oct 12 2017 09:15
I think that was in the ogryn thing?
Let me look again
But yes, I completely forgot to link relics in the ogryn
Only reason I didn’t do hides in regiment specific detachments for relics was because “or” condition groups weren’t working right for me
Better pic of that heavy tank.
Astrues Super Heavy Tank
Asterus even
Joe Beddoe
@CrusherJoe
Oct 12 2017 17:19
Wow they actually succeeded in making an abomination
zopha
@zopha
Oct 12 2017 17:21
Orkamedies approved.
Alex Baur
@acebaur
Oct 12 2017 17:27
@FarseerVeraenthis did I miss a bug with it? What are looking to do to it?
Dirk Bachert
@Thairne
Oct 12 2017 17:44
Its getting worse.
REpulsor was repulsive. This is... just... just... no.
it just so looks like it needs tracks.
WindstormSCR
@WindstormSCR
Oct 12 2017 17:47
eh, I think as designs go it's not completely terrible
at least the primaris vehicle aesthetic is consistent
I might have been interested for the RG if it had transport cap, but as it sits it's just meh ruleswise from the WH comm article
Iain Launchbury
@Mad-Spy
Oct 12 2017 17:50
It is quite possibly the ugliest monstrosity I've ever seen.
WindstormSCR
@WindstormSCR
Oct 12 2017 17:52
its gw, I'm pretty sure they could have made something far worse (cough Orion cough)
Alex Baur
@acebaur
Oct 12 2017 18:03
Honestly it's not a terrible design to me just looking at it as "sci-fi hover tank" but as 40k imperium vehicle? It's God awful
zopha
@zopha
Oct 12 2017 18:07
It's why the admech shun innovation.
WindstormSCR
@WindstormSCR
Oct 12 2017 18:07
I actually like the fact the primaris stuff is different but still has a really chunky aesthetic
to me the chunky feeling was more important than it being blocky
tekton
@tekton
Oct 12 2017 19:03
I’m still going to end up buying at least one...
Dirk Bachert
@Thairne
Oct 12 2017 20:21
hm
at least its not just so.. BUSY as the repulsor
which is the main gripe honestely
Jon Kissinger
@alphalas
Oct 12 2017 20:29
^ truth
Dirk Bachert
@Thairne
Oct 12 2017 20:35
I start to like it
it looks quite monstrous
like crush you under his.. erh.. treads monstrous