These are chat archives for BSData/wh40k
Sure I do. And I sure won't leave that as an option 'till FAQ allows it specifically. It's beyond crazy to leave it and it'll hurt more if I leave it just to wait for FAQ to remove it.
Also, I'm still open for discussion. :)
Isn’t our standard MO to support all options until proven wrong by faq?
@alphalas It is. However I actually can't find it written, can you? We should probably write that down. Possibly as a rule number 0?
Colin McDade Joe Beddoe my argument to say no to that obvious tomfoolery, using GW’s said flow chart document. Is that since the said wargear (stim injectors) has rules in the codex as a stratagem, it replaces the rules for it in the index. Thus they could pay for the stim injectors but get no rules for it. Also, you would still use the codex points values for said equipment, which doesn’t exist for stim injectors so there is no way for them to legally pay a points cost for it either.
So there’s 2 reasons why it’s no. Just based off the same document they’re trying to use to say yes.
- All choices, entries, upgrades etc. that are: valid, possibly valid or possibly invalid MUST be represented (implemented) and MUST NOT raise errors/warnings. This is the single most important rule. If there is a doubt if an option is legal, it MUST be included. Motivation: we are not rules lawyers. Our effort targets all audiences, no matter their personal decisions, erratas or agreements. Our only source is Rules As Written (RAW), published by Games Workshop and their subsidiaries (Forge World etc.); that includes officially posted Erratas and FAQs (Facebook pages, emails and other unofficial channels excluded).