Where communities thrive


  • Join over 1.5M+ people
  • Join over 100K+ communities
  • Free without limits
  • Create your own community
People
Repo info
Activity
  • Oct 13 23:43
    mnanduri commented #538
  • Oct 13 21:34
    mnanduri commented #538
  • Oct 13 21:19
    mnanduri commented #538
  • Oct 13 21:19
    mnanduri commented #538
  • Oct 13 21:17
    mnanduri commented #538
  • Oct 13 21:14
    mnanduri commented #538
  • Oct 13 12:59
    thomas-mangin commented #924
  • Oct 13 12:58
    thomas-mangin labeled #924
  • Oct 13 12:58
    thomas-mangin assigned #924
  • Oct 13 12:58
    thomas-mangin commented #924
  • Oct 11 21:53
    omkartikare commented #538
  • Oct 11 15:55
    arbaldin edited #924
  • Oct 11 15:54
    arbaldin opened #924
  • Oct 09 10:16
    MAK4789 commented #507
  • Oct 04 13:28
    elindsey commented #923
  • Sep 30 19:01
    thomas-mangin commented #923
  • Sep 30 19:00

    thomas-mangin on master

    give credit where credit is due (compare)

  • Sep 30 18:57

    thomas-mangin on master

    rename existing TrafficNextHop … add support for flowspec redire… add support for flowspec redire… and 3 more (compare)

  • Sep 30 18:57
    thomas-mangin closed #923
  • Sep 30 18:57
    thomas-mangin commented #923
sanjmonkey
@sanjmonkey
a bottle of pear liqueur ?
Thomas Mangin
@thomas-mangin
LOL - no - that’s ok still plenty left
@sanjmonkey can I please have your full name for the changelog ?
sanjmonkey
@sanjmonkey
sure, Sandy Breeze
Thomas Mangin
@thomas-mangin
Thank - I only remembered your first name
sanjmonkey
@sanjmonkey
np!
Thomas Mangin
@thomas-mangin
pushed to my tree - as soon as CI reports all fine - pushing to main repo
done
sanjmonkey
@sanjmonkey
cloning!
Thomas Mangin
@thomas-mangin
You should be having a relaxing evening .. but who am I to judge :tongue:
sanjmonkey
@sanjmonkey
perhaps I cloned too early, no reply to md5 session :(
22:06:11.174545 IP <x.x.x.x>.40356 > <y.y.y.y>.179: Flags [S], seq 3786399209, win 29200, options [nop,nop,md5valid,mss 1460,nop,nop,sackOK,nop,wscale 7], length 0
Thomas Mangin
@thomas-mangin
hum ...
on the receiving exabgp you need to add
“listen <port>"
sorry
sanjmonkey
@sanjmonkey
oooh
Thomas Mangin
@thomas-mangin
“listen <port>;"
like you would do for passive
or hold-time
MD5 is a per peer setting
previously the only way to listen was via the global option exabgp.tcp.bind
it is not the case anymore
hence why the patch took a few hours
sanjmonkey
@sanjmonkey

i see new reactor message: Listening for BGP session(s) on <y.y.y.y>:179 with MD5

but no ack to this syn:
22:12:52.454633 IP <x.x.x.x>.33553 > <y.y.y.y>.179: Flags [S], seq 2573773506, win 29200, options [nop,nop,md5valid,mss 1460,nop,nop,sackOK,nop,wscale 7], length 0

passive side is listening as it should
Thomas Mangin
@thomas-mangin
passive : do not establish outgoing connection
so without using the global listening option a passive neighbour is as good as unconfigured
listen <port> accept incoming connection
so both options are orthogonals
you can have passive, passive + listen, listen
hum .. not sure why it does not work for you ...
I need to add an “active” or “port” option to set out on what port the peer will connect out ..
when I tried I only tested 1790 ( to not have to use root )
but it should make no difference
(and I am lying I did test 179 .. ) - tired
sanjmonkey
@sanjmonkey
ok, and 179 works for you?
Thomas Mangin
@thomas-mangin
yes
sanjmonkey
@sanjmonkey
me too (tired). let me look at it with a fresh pair of eyes tomorrow, perhaps I’ve missed something obvious!
Thomas Mangin
@thomas-mangin
ok - I should be online in the afternoon
sanjmonkey
@sanjmonkey
dont want to waste your time
Thomas Mangin
@thomas-mangin
feel free to grab me here
no issue
sanjmonkey
@sanjmonkey
1000x thankyous again
Thomas Mangin
@thomas-mangin
you are welcome :smile:
Thomas Mangin
@thomas-mangin
@sanjmonkey where is the code located ?
and good morning
Thomas Mangin
@thomas-mangin
sorry I am blind
Thomas Mangin
@thomas-mangin
will look later on - can not find anything obviously wrong
it would like the socket is not setup correctly for MD5 and therefore the kernel is not matching the incoming packet to the socket but AFAICS all was setup fine .