Where communities thrive


  • Join over 1.5M+ people
  • Join over 100K+ communities
  • Free without limits
  • Create your own community
People
Repo info
Activity
  • 02:23
    garrettjstevens commented #96
  • 02:22
    garrettjstevens synchronize #96
  • 02:22

    garrettjstevens on Issue92

    init commit tmp commit ready for draft PR (compare)

  • May 16 23:17

    garrettjstevens on Issue91

    (compare)

  • May 16 23:17

    garrettjstevens on main

    Add features from file (#94) *… (compare)

  • May 16 23:17
    garrettjstevens closed #94
  • May 16 23:17
    garrettjstevens closed #91
  • May 16 23:08
    garrettjstevens ready_for_review #94
  • May 16 23:08
    garrettjstevens edited #96
  • May 16 23:08
    garrettjstevens edited #96
  • May 16 23:07
    garrettjstevens synchronize #94
  • May 16 23:07

    garrettjstevens on Issue91

    Pass fs from server to shared (compare)

  • May 16 14:12
    kyostiebi assigned #96
  • May 16 14:12
    kyostiebi opened #96
  • May 16 14:10

    kyostiebi on Issue92

    ready for draft PR (compare)

  • May 13 02:18
    garrettjstevens commented #92
  • May 13 02:18
    garrettjstevens edited #92
  • May 13 00:22
    garrettjstevens synchronize #94
  • May 13 00:22

    garrettjstevens on Issue91

    tmp commit tmp commit tmp commit and 2 more (compare)

  • May 12 23:56

    garrettjstevens on higher_level_changes

    (compare)

Nathan Dunn
@nathandunn
test chat message
Deepak
@deepakunni3
Message received
Nathan Dunn
@nathandunn
great . .. FYI, I just pushed a change so that the integration tests are more consistent
Deepak
@deepakunni3
Awesome. So no more random break in integration tests.
Nathan Dunn
@nathandunn
basically when it pulls out a sequence alteration I am sorting it by its fmin . . . so if it fails .. it will consistently fail and vice versa
that is my hope :smile:
Deepak
@deepakunni3
but why would it fail sometimes and pass in other cases
Nathan Dunn
@nathandunn
I'm sure there is some random assortment of sequence alterations that when combined create this error. . . that or you can't combine them randomly
either way you want a consistent result
Nathan Dunn
@nathandunn
BTW, what is status of #458?
Deepak
@deepakunni3
#458 is up for review. It should be fixed with the commits made in the pull request
Nathan Dunn
@nathandunn
I see . . is this for @monicacecilia to review?
or did I already merge it? (sorry long weekend)
it looks like I did in #472 . . this should be marked as ready then and put up?
Deepak
@deepakunni3
yeah. I wanted your opinion on it. if it looks good then we can put it up for testing.
Nathan Dunn
@nathandunn
yeah, I looked over it, but if you want to walk me through it that would be great
Deepak
@deepakunni3
sure. skype?
Nathan Dunn
@nathandunn
sure
Nathan Dunn
@nathandunn
@deepakunni3 This was the alternate codes one I was talking about: GMOD/Apollo#95
anyway . . . not sure what the priority is
Deepak
@deepakunni3
ah, yes. We should add this to the agenda for Thursday
Nathan Dunn
@nathandunn
agreed
Robert Buels
@rbuels
@nathandunn oh this channel exists!
Nathan Dunn
@nathandunn
I here
Dan Keith
@DoctorBud
I'm just a fly on the wall here... Pay me no mind.
Nathan Dunn
@nathandunn
He’s on to us!
Nathan Dunn
@nathandunn
Apropos @DoctorBud the genome feature widget is bein refactored to not have any react components in the test or the demo, so hopefully will clean things up
Robert Buels
@rbuels
@nathandunn @deepakunni3 OK if I configure Gitter to watch the GMOD/Apollo repo and issues for activity messages
?
commits and whatnot