No, there are a couple projects that aim to replicate it but the actual haxe compiler does not do this
the code runner has been added to spacevim.
@wsdjeg: where would I look for the config spacevim does for haxe? I'm interested in exactly which plugins etc. it uses for Haxe support
This is repl for haxe
But anyway, I'd seriously love to help out with any Haxe project that serves a useful purpose to a potentially sizable amount of users.
Ah, I see he's not an expert on SEO
You need to enable JavaScript to run this app.
wait this is the main chat
No, this is the gitter chat for the repo afaik.
Main chat is #haxe:matrix.org.
Main chat is #haxe:matrix.org.
But still what?
And I still do not understand why you use the crying emoji so much.
And I still do not understand why you use the crying emoji so much.
you can use a
js.lib.Map when targeting JS
is there no better things to do *lol (^_^)
i am ended into this tonight: http://www.maitag.de/semmi/haxelime/peote-view-remaster/reaction-diffusion/x3/test05/
thx to hx all is superportable now .)
sometimes it is time to code also some stuff you are need (all is NEED!)
Hi there. I just spend 15 minutes, searching for @pure in the documentation, and the build-in search has shown me nothing and I think this could be improved. Also consider adding this to the documentation about functions itself.
Here is it, currently pretty hidden for the value it provides, imho: https://haxe.org/manual/cr-metadata.html
And this is one of the many places, I find it appropriate to be added: https://code.haxe.org/category/beginner/declare-functions.html
Here is it, currently pretty hidden for the value it provides, imho: https://haxe.org/manual/cr-metadata.html
And this is one of the many places, I find it appropriate to be added: https://code.haxe.org/category/beginner/declare-functions.html
I think it was added recently?
it is more of an internal detail of the analyzer, although it's indeed quite useful when creating externs, where the compiler cannot infer purity due to lacking implementation
it's indeed quite useful when creating externs, where the compiler cannot infer purity due to lacking implementation
How do you mean "infer purity"? Since when can Haxe infer purity and what does this mean?
and no, you shouldn't add it all over your code, unless you're sure it's safe for the compiler to remove it
It would be awesome if there was a macro that enforced lack of side-effects but haxe can't know enough at that stage (or ever, as the case may be) to do such an enforcement. It's unfortunately just an assertion of purity. But you can always make your own functional haxe dsl that directly targets other languages? (very non-trivial)
Either its pure or not.
