dependabot[bot] on nuget
dependabot[bot] on nuget
Bump MscrmTools.Xrm.Connection … (compare)
dependabot[bot] on nuget
Bump Microsoft.CrmSdk.XrmToolin… (compare)
dependabot[bot] on nuget
Bump Microsoft.CrmSdk.XrmToolin… (compare)
dependabot[bot] on nuget
Bump Microsoft.CrmSdk.XrmToolin… (compare)
dependabot[bot] on nuget
If you run this query it actually executes, so the innards of CRM has support for the RowAggregate on the attribute node.
More precisely the fetch was taken from an out-of-the-box "Active Accounts" view.
<fetch version='1.0' output-format='xml-platform' mapping='logical' >
<entity name='account' >
<attribute name='name' />
<attribute name='address1_city' />
<order attribute='name' descending='false' />
<attribute name='primarycontactid' />
<attribute name='telephone1' />
<filter type='and' >
<condition attribute='statecode' operator='eq' value='0' />
</filter>
<link-entity alias='accountprimarycontactidcontactcontactid' name='contact' from='contactid' to='primarycontactid' link-type='outer' visible='false' >
<attribute name='emailaddress1' />
</link-entity>
<attribute name='accountid' />
</entity>
</fetch>
(Sorry about the delay, I'm currently at eXtreme365 in Dubrovnik)
The FetchType
object is created from the FetchXML in this method: https://github.com/Innofactor/FetchXMLBuilder/blob/master/FetchXmlBuilder/DockControls/TreeBuilderControl.cs#L202-L212
The FetchType
class is generated from the fetch.xsd
schema file provided by Microsoft: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/dynamics365/customer-engagement/developer/org-service/fetchxml-schema
I use this cmd file to generate the class from the schema: https://github.com/Innofactor/FetchXMLBuilder/blob/master/FetchXmlBuilder/Resources/XSD%20fetch.cs.cmd
Hope this helps!
In this fetch, the UI complains that "entityname" is invalid in the condition which I believe I see in the example given. Haven't gotten much past that. I see that my filters may need work, but this syntax issues has me stumped
<fetch mapping="logical" version="1.0" distinct="true" output-format="xml-platform" >
<entity name="contact" >
<attribute name="fullname" />
<attribute name="xyz_studentid" />
<attribute name="contactid" />
<filter type="and" >
<condition value="0" attribute="statecode" operator="eq" />
<condition value="1" attribute="xyz_isstudent" operator="eq" />
</filter>
<link-entity name="xyz_enrollment" to="contactid" from="xyz_student" alias="Fut" link-type="outer" />
<link-entity name="xyz_enrollment" to="contactid" from="xyz_student" alias="Prev" >
<filter type="or" >
<filter type="and" >
<condition entityname="Prev" attribute="xyz_code" operator="in" >
<value>{E165DCFC-785B-E711-8119-E0071B669EB1}</value>
<value>{E065DCFC-785B-E711-8119-E0071B669EB1}</value>
</condition>
<condition entityname="Prev" value="802430000" attribute="xyz_enrollmentstatus" operator="eq" />
</filter>
<filter type="and" >
<condition entityname="Fit" attribute="xyz_code" operator="in" >
<value>{EA65DCFC-785B-E711-8119-E0071B669EB1}</value>
<value>{E865DCFC-785B-E711-8119-E0071B669EB1}</value>
<value>{E665DCFC-785B-E711-8119-E0071B669EB1}</value>
<value>{E365DCFC-785B-E711-8119-E0071B669EB1}</value>
</condition>
<condition entityname="Fut" value="802430000" attribute="xyz_enrollmentstatus" operator="eq" />
</filter>
</filter>
</link-entity>
</entity>
</fetch>
Can anyone help with a quick FetchXML question...
<fetch top="1" >
<entity name="systemuser" >
<attribute name="systemuserid" />
<attribute name="businessunitid" />
</entity>
</fetch>
Nice'n'easy, yeah? A couple of attributes from the first systemuser record...
<resultset morerecords="0" >
<result>
<systemuserid>{DC650CAB-C453-E611-941D-00155D731475}</systemuserid>
<businessunitid dsc="" name="MRWA" type="10" >{6BB9164F-865F-E211-953C-02BFAC106E42}</businessunitid>
</result>
</resultset>
Is there any way I can suppress the @name, @dsc, @type attributes of businessunitid from being sent by the FetchXML? In my "real" use cases, i'm using FetchXML to populate a datamart and the sending across of this type of lookup data for all my rows is wasting bandwidth!