Where communities thrive


  • Join over 1.5M+ people
  • Join over 100K+ communities
  • Free without limits
  • Create your own community
People
Repo info
Activity
  • Sep 25 17:41
    agrare commented #745
  • Sep 25 17:36
    agrare commented #745
  • Sep 25 15:08
    lamm commented #745
  • Sep 24 20:16
    agrare commented #745
  • Sep 24 20:15
    agrare commented #745
  • Sep 24 20:15
    agrare commented #745
  • Sep 24 20:14
    agrare commented #745
  • Sep 24 20:03
    lamm commented #745
  • Sep 24 17:04
    agrare commented #745
  • Sep 24 16:22
    lamm commented #745
  • Sep 24 13:20
    Fryguy labeled #749
  • Sep 24 13:20
    Fryguy unlabeled #749
  • Sep 24 13:20
    Fryguy unlabeled #749
  • Sep 24 13:20
    Fryguy commented #749
  • Sep 24 13:20

    Fryguy on morphy

    Merge pull request #749 from ag… (compare)

  • Sep 24 13:18
    agrare commented #749
  • Sep 24 13:18
    Fryguy commented #749
  • Sep 24 13:17
    Fryguy labeled #749
  • Sep 24 13:17
    Fryguy commented #749
  • Sep 24 13:17
    Fryguy unlabeled #749
Jerry Keselman
@jerryk55
Depending upon whether scan_via_host is enabled or not, a different thumbprint is required.
yes
Adam Grare
@agrare
well it says that it gets it differently but not why
Jerry Keselman
@jerryk55
Because I couldn't get the thumbprint from the vCenter the same way I could get it from the ESX host.
Adam Grare
@agrare
I checked a 6.0 host and the ssl_cert from the server is the same as what you get from that /host/ssl_cert
Fabien Dupont
@fdupont-redhat
It says that it needs a different thumprint, not that the method to get it has to be different...
Jerry Keselman
@jerryk55
The test servers I was working with at that time (4 years) required a different method.
Adam Grare
@agrare
hm okay
Jerry Keselman
@jerryk55
Could it have been the way they were configured? Absolutely.
Fabien Dupont
@fdupont-redhat
Then, functional tests with different version of vCenter is the only way to find out if it would break something, right ?
Adam Grare
@agrare
6.0 is the oldest we have
Also maybe the oldest we support, if this was only needed on older versions maybe we can simplify it
Andrey Menezes
@AndreyMenezes
.0
Fabien Dupont
@fdupont-redhat
@agrare I'll look into it. This will require changes in other repos.
samson7point1
@samson7point1
Are NSX networks not supported in CFME 5.10?
CloudForms doesn't seem to be able to see them at all.
Adam Grare
@agrare
hey @samson7point1 that's not something which is currently supported
samson7point1
@samson7point1
@agrare Is this on the roadmap at all, maybe as a network provider in the future?
Adam Grare
@agrare
@samson7point1 I'd love to support it as a network provider, just time and resources
samson7point1
@samson7point1
@agrare I hear you there
samson7point1
@samson7point1
@agrare I'm still trying to skin this cat and I noticed that the pyvmomi has some support for "opaque networks" - in this case the customer is using NSX-v which is completely external to vCenter. Is it possible for MIQ to support opaque networks (outside the context of NSX specifically).
?
Adam Grare
@agrare
hey we actually had a community user push a PR trying to collect these opaque networks
I think it stalled when trying to link them up to hosts
let me check
samson7point1
@samson7point1
awesome, thanks!
really need an environment to test it in
samson7point1
@samson7point1
Well... I'm not sure how much longer I'll have access to it, but I'm at a customer site with this circumstance right now.
Adam Grare
@agrare
Okay I'll DM you in a little bit, lets see if we can resurect that PR and get some specs recorded to test against
samson7point1
@samson7point1
That would be killer, thanks
To be clear this is actually CloudForms 4.6
samson7point1
@samson7point1
@agrare I don't know if this is related or something else entirely, but when we tested assigning opaque networks to VMs during provisioning, we didn't catch that the NICs were coming up "Disconnected". They were attached to the correct network but not activated. I'm working with the consultants onsite to try to isolate the cause, but I suspect it's at least possible it has something to do with those opaque networks.
Adam Grare
@agrare
can you be more specific about coming up disconnected
samson7point1
@samson7point1
in vCenter the NIC will appear on the VM, but will have a status of "Disconnected".
Adam Grare
@agrare
like miq reports they're disconnected, or on vsphere they're disconnected
can you manually connect them?
samson7point1
@samson7point1
It will have the correct network assigned and everything
I'm trying to get that question answered right now.
Adam Grare
@agrare
it could be that the "start_disconnected" attribute of our guest_devices was set to false for some reason
or it could be that Opaque backing type that I was talking about before
samson7point1
@samson7point1
That's why I mentioned it
I don't have direct access any more, so I'm working vicariously through the consultants onsite.
Okay, it sounds like the customer has decided to call it a day so I'm no going to be able to get anything more from them until Monday.
I'm going to have them try deploying the same template somewhere with a DVS network to see if the opaque networks thing is the common denominator
Adam Grare
@agrare
:+1:
samson7point1
@samson7point1
@agrare So it's monday and the consulants are back onsite. I can confirm that the NICS provisioned in a disconnected state could be connected manually in vCenter.
We're continuing fault isolation.
Adam Grare
@agrare
okay thanks
samson7point1
@samson7point1
Spoke too soon. The customer told us they were able to manually connect but now they're walking that back.