Where communities thrive


  • Join over 1.5M+ people
  • Join over 100K+ communities
  • Free without limits
  • Create your own community
People
Activity
  • May 20 17:31
    RickStrahl commented #960
  • May 20 05:03
    RickStrahl commented #960
  • May 20 05:02

    RickStrahl on main

    Update Changelog.md (compare)

  • May 20 04:53
    RickStrahl commented #960
  • May 20 04:13
    RickStrahl commented #960
  • May 20 04:08
    RickStrahl labeled #960
  • May 20 04:08
    RickStrahl assigned #960
  • May 20 04:08
    RickStrahl edited #960
  • May 20 04:08
    RickStrahl opened #960
  • May 19 01:09

    RickStrahl on main

    Update Changelog.md (compare)

  • May 19 00:22
    RickStrahl commented #959
  • May 17 17:34

    RickStrahl on main

    Update Changelog.md (compare)

  • May 17 05:32

    RickStrahl on main

    Update Changelog.md (compare)

  • May 17 05:30

    RickStrahl on main

    Update Changelog.md (compare)

  • May 15 20:13
    RickStrahl assigned #959
  • May 15 20:13
    RickStrahl commented #959
  • May 15 20:11
    RickStrahl commented #959
  • May 15 19:53
    RickStrahl commented #959
  • May 15 19:52
    RickStrahl labeled #959
  • May 15 14:43
    jbridgy commented #936
Rob Reynolds
@ferventcoder
The default installation directory is locked down to admins only with modify access
we highlight that in the more options section oh the install page. Also on the security page
Rick Strahl
@RickStrahl
@ferventcoder So then what's the point of a portable install if you still require admin? Shouldn't choco install in a location that doesn't require admin rights?
Rick Strahl
@RickStrahl
@ferventcoder Ok, fair enough. I was under the impression that Chocolatey could run under limited rights, because that's what several people were asking for. So when I don't specify Admin rights on the installer does it run the installer under Admin as well or under user account? I thought this was the whole point of a portable, non-admin capable install.
We probably should move this over to @chocolate.org group :-)
Rob Reynolds
@ferventcoder
Chocolatey can run under limited rights. By default it does not due to more secure by default settings
Rick Strahl
@RickStrahl
@gep13 BTW, you can now do:
---
Title: @Model.ActiveDocument.Title
Published: @DateTime.Now.ToString("yyy-MM-dd")
Tags: 
- ~
---
In 1.1.20 of Markdown Monster. No more @Razor code block required to figure out the file name.
That feature needs a little more work - like it should also capture a title from FrontMatter.
Gary Ewan Park
@gep13
@RickStrahl sweet!
will give that a try as well
hmm, when I try the above, I get...
blob
signing off for just now, but will try again later
thanks again for all your help!
Rick Strahl
@RickStrahl
Maybe it didn't make it in 1.1.20. It's in there for next rev though.
Ah yes, it's in 1.1.20.1 (from Web site only)
Gary Ewan Park
@gep13
Gotcha, will keep an eye out for it.
Rob Reynolds
@ferventcoder
Nice!
it's actually very naive
Rick Strahl
@RickStrahl
Yeah I'm also doing that front matter parsing already for Weblog posts - just have to pull that code out and plug into the Title property retrieval which will be useful in other places as well.
Rick Strahl
@RickStrahl
@ferventcoder @gep13 The Title parsing for Front Matter will be part of the next release (1.1.22 and later).
Gary Ewan Park
@gep13
Sweet!
Rob Reynolds
@ferventcoder
:+1:
Mordechai Zuber
@M-Zuber
RickStrahl/MarkdownMonster#119
With regards to that issue, I noticed that there is no concept of opening a folder, which makes my point loose a lot
Any thoughts on adding a concept folder/project concept to MM?
Rick Strahl
@RickStrahl
There's no reason an addin couldn't do that however. You'd basically could have your own configuration in an addin that has a base folder.
I'm not sure if I want to go down the path of building a new 'editor' that treats folders like projects for the main editor. That adds a lot of complexity. Maybe in the future. But again an Addin can easily handle that with keeping a base folder and it's own set of configuration settings for each 'project'.
There have been a bunch of requests for adding folder display support. I think it's something that I might do a little later for a 2.0 version, but for now I want the main editor to focus on core editing related stuff.
Mordechai Zuber
@M-Zuber
Makes sense
As far as the wyam add in, I spoke to a number of other wyam users, and the consensus was that a more generic command line launcher makes more sense for an initial effore, so I will open an issue for that
Mordechai Zuber
@M-Zuber
Another thing - where is the best place to understand how the existing infrastuctre for publishing to a blog works?
Rick Strahl
@RickStrahl
What do you want to know? How it works, or how to do it?
The implementation is in an addin - it's not a part of the core Markdown Monster editor.
For how it works there's info in the docs: https://markdownmonster.west-wind.com/docs/_4nb0ser9f.htm
Although that probably needs an update - still works the same but the screen shots are a little out of date :-)
Paulo Morgado
@paulomorgado
Hi all! What are the available themes? I need a light them.
doh! there's a selection at the bottom. no need to manually edit the settings.
Larry Lai
@lai3d
Risk is awesome
Rick Strahl
@RickStrahl
Ok...
Mehul Harry
@mehulharry_twitter
Hey @RickStrahl what info can I provide for that issue?
Rick Strahl
@RickStrahl
What version are you using?
Mehul Harry
@mehulharry_twitter
1.6.2
Rick Strahl
@RickStrahl
Ok...
I think the issue if there are no images open initially the option is disabled and the bindings are not refreshing.
So we can try this:
Do you have UseSingleWindow: true in config?
Mehul Harry
@mehulharry_twitter
yes