Where communities thrive


  • Join over 1.5M+ people
  • Join over 100K+ communities
  • Free without limits
  • Create your own community
People
Repo info
Activity
  • Nov 18 06:22
    classchneider commented #2121
  • Nov 11 11:34
    MilosKozak closed #3016
  • Nov 11 11:34
    MilosKozak commented #3016
  • Nov 09 12:07
    shisheng-1 opened #3016
  • Nov 06 16:56
    MilosKozak closed #2886
  • Nov 06 16:56
    MilosKozak commented #2886
  • Nov 06 06:59
    old-square-eyes commented #2886
  • Oct 18 16:08
    Typ1er closed #3015
  • Oct 18 04:36
    thomasbeNZ commented #1958
  • Oct 17 20:08
    Typ1er opened #3015
  • Oct 12 09:21
    MilosKozak commented #3014
  • Oct 12 09:20
    MilosKozak labeled #3014
  • Oct 12 05:00
    thomasbeNZ commented #1958
  • Oct 11 15:35
    matej2013 opened #3014
  • Oct 07 21:11

    MilosKozak on 2.6.2

    (compare)

  • Oct 05 16:04

    MilosKozak on fixes-pse01

    (compare)

  • Oct 05 16:04

    MilosKozak on 2.7.0-rc7

    (compare)

  • Oct 05 16:03
    MilosKozak closed #1898
  • Oct 05 16:03
    MilosKozak closed #2133
  • Oct 05 16:03
    MilosKozak closed #2235
Dirceu Semighini Filho
@dirceusemighini
I think that you can also use the step count ;)
this AAPS class, does have it, but in the oposite direction, it's AAPS sending data to XDrip, maybe this can help you: info.nightscout.androidaps.plugins.general.nsclient.NSUpload
see the sendToXDrip method, it broadcast a json that XDrip is listenning, I'm not sure but maybe is something simmilar to the notifications.
Now you have to discover if there is a listener, for this kind of events at AAPS
Ashley112885
@Ashley112885
Has anyone successfully executed the Sony SW3 troubleshooting steps recently? I seem to be stick with “Failure [INSTALL_FAILED_OLDER_SDK]”, perhaps SW3 is dead at this point?
dvdv
@dvdv_gitlab
you have to manually install the wear APK via adb install after patching the code
which to me is an indicator that the SW3 is at or very close to its EOL
JohnDoeAkira
@JohnDoeAkira
Is there a way to recover the master password ? I cannot remember it and I would like to export my settings ... '
Andy Rozman
@andyrozman
@JohnDoeAkira I don't think so...
swissalpine
@swissalpine
Maybe someone can help me ...
Earlier when I made the following query, I got openaps and pump data:
https://sub.herokuapp.com/api/v1/devicestatus.json?count=1
Recently I only get data about my uploader device.
[{"_id":"60313bb211a45dff7edd6f62","device":"Unihertz Jelly2","uploader":{"battery":57},"created_at":"2021-02-20T16:41:22.868Z","utcOffset":0,"mills":1613839282868}]
What is the current query to also query the pumps and openaps data that continues to be stored in devicestatus?
Milos Kozak
@MilosKozak
isn't it upload from xdrip?
swissalpine
@swissalpine
I've build a widget (for my own needs) which shows forecast, bgi, pump level etc. based on a nightscout request. This works for months. - With the mentioned query I was getting the aaps data from Nightscout, xDrip+ provides only the aaps status-line.
Maybe I open an issue on cgm remote github.
swissalpine
@swissalpine
Dirceu Semighini Filho
@dirceusemighini
Very nice @swissalpine, can it be displayed when the screen is locked?
Milos Kozak
@MilosKozak
anoyne with combo online? i need to test combo branch
ga-zelle
@ga-zelle
@MilosKozak What would I need to do?
Milos Kozak
@MilosKozak
just run it and check if pump comm works (no crash)
Raymond Richmond
@PedanticAvenger
Not to step in front of a bus with this question, looking for thoughts on why this request may be a terrible idea or not.
Looking to adopt the Omnipod but have a resevoir size issue, I'm comfortable putting U200 into it and understand the changes to ISF and IC parameters required but was thinking that given I do everything through the AAPS interface already if there would be value to including a U100/U200 flag in the config to "Just do the calculations" so I can continue to think in straight unit values and not have my ratios look funny when I want to run reports. I suspect this may need to be considered when Insulet gets formal approval for U200 anyway.
swissalpine
@swissalpine
@dirceusemighini This is/was a widget for a Garmin Watch ...
Dirceu Semighini Filho
@dirceusemighini
Ah ok @swissalpine
Andy Rozman
@andyrozman
@PedanticAvenger Which insulin has 200U/ml? I think so far all calculations require 100U/ml insulin, reworking that to support "stronger" or "weaker" insulins, would be a big change, that would not benefit many...
Guy Davies
@guydavies
@andyrozman I think you can get pretty much all modern insulins in 200U/ml formulation. It's relatively common for people with very strong insulin resistance so that they're not injecting several tens of units at a time. You're right that it's not very common for people to use them in pumps but I have seen it a few times before on various forums. I guess that in most situations, a factor of 2 in the right direction would be all that was needed to make the maths correct, but there's always going to be somewhere in the code where that doesn't apply which would be potentially dangerous.
John Kitching
@JohnKitching
Would a simple, safe solution be to have a create new profile option that takes a u100 profile and does the maths to create a u200 profile? Half basals, double ISF and CR? Is that it?
The existing code wouldn’t need to change would it?
larsqvd
@larsqvd
omnipod is working activly on getting certification for 200 u/ml and potentially even 500 U/ml for high insulin resistance patients and/or people with a higher than a 200 U requirement for three days.
Guy Davies
@guydavies
@JohnKitching I don't know. If there's an assumption anywhere in the code that 1ml == 100u, even in a driver, that might make life dangerous. I don't have sufficient knowledge of the code to say.
Dirceu Semighini Filho
@dirceusemighini
Can't it be used as a new insulin type, as you apply the concentration factor for all profile fields?
I see a lot of mothers of young/babies t1d having problems with 100ui/ml insulins, are there any kind of few concentrated, like 50ui/ml for kids?
John Kitching
@JohnKitching
@guydavies I have zero knowledge of the code but I can’t come up with anything in theory that makes u200 in a resistant person any different to u100 in a sensitive person. Everything has to come back to ISF, CR etc doesn’t it?
I think u100 only means something in a lab, not in the real world because of the massively different requirements between different people.
larsqvd
@larsqvd
Potentially only confusing messages from the insulin provider or GP compared to what will be used in AAPS during the transition phase from u100 to u200.
seware74
@seware74
I am one who uses U200 in omnipod. My daily insulin requirement is about 150 units, so with U100 a 200ml pod would only give me 32 hours. After getting comfortable with AAPS I got my endo to prescribe U200 so that my pod will last closer to 64 hours. Just changes to basal ISF and CR are required. I made a profile like that and it works brilliantly. I only have to remember to cut any manual boluses in half. It would be great to see AAPS support multiple insulins strengths but I'm doing okay like it is. Also, I have to remember to translate my averages for the endo so she doesn't think I'm at half daily usage.
Raymond Richmond
@PedanticAvenger
And for me my daily requirement is about 100 units so really same boat. If I want 3 days out of a pod I need U200. I am also comfortable doing the calculations but doing that means that all my nightscout data must be "interpreted" rather than just "read". I will try to take a look at the various pump drivers but the interface between the driver and the rest of AAPS should be able to take care of that as I'm assuming that has been standardised. Internally divide units by 2 when sending a bolus or setting a basal. The rest isn't relevant to the pump but the calculations.
John Kitching
@JohnKitching
@PedanticAvenger I’m not sure you need to do that. If you double your CR then bolus and NS would be correct wouldn’t they? Same with ISF.
Raymond Richmond
@PedanticAvenger
@JohnKitching Except that now NS shows 5 Units bolus when in actuality it is 10 Units. And my endo has to think the math when judging the CR and ISF values.
John Kitching
@JohnKitching
Personally I’d rather live with CR and ISF being wrong and NS and boluses being right.
Raymond Richmond
@PedanticAvenger
But with the system not knowing about the insulin concentrations differences the NS and boluses will never be right. I will always have to divide boluses by 2 to avoid overdosing.
John Kitching
@JohnKitching
I’d argue that CR and ISF would be correct (for u200)
NS and bolus would be right if you double CR and ISF unless I’m missing something.
If I were to switch from u100 to u200 I’d half every basal rate, double CR, double ISF and I think everything would work as it did before. I’m happy to be proven wrong though.
seware74
@seware74
@JohnKitching that's exactly what I'm doing with U200. Everything works perfectly on an automatic basis except reporting, but I don't use NS anyway. Anything manual requires a divide by 2. Been doing this since April 2020 and having no problems.
John Kitching
@JohnKitching
@seware74 that’s good to hear. Thanks for sharing. I’m glad I wasn’t going completely mad 😏
Raymond Richmond
@PedanticAvenger
You're not going mad, but it's a goal to have the ENTIRE system reflect reality correcty.
The treatments would be fine but you would always have to remind your Endo "But the records I just gave you all have to be translated." And while every Endo is different mine would NOT be happy with having to do that. They are used to seeing data in a certain way all day long and now along comes this speed bump.
seware74
@seware74
@PedanticAvenger You're not wrong. In my case I provide my endo with the treatment data and the bgs come from tidepool. It would be great to have everything perfect but for now I'm happy to be able to be free of tubes (no more medtronic for me) and looping successfully despite my high insulin needs. Now, if only I could refill a pod... :)
wootmaster
@wootmasterslick
Shouldn’t the U to volume for the injection be converted by the pump/pump driver?
Raymond Richmond
@PedanticAvenger
The pump yes.
seware74
@seware74
@wootmasterslick ideally yes at the pump, but because currently there are no pumps that support multiple concentrations of insulin (that I'm aware of) nor are there any that support anything other than U100 (that I'm aware of), in the spirit of "we are not waiting" a pump designed for U100 is being used for U200 for instance. Handling in the profile is a workaround until new pumps emerge. I think the OP is just asking to simplify the workaround so that all inputs and outputs appear accurately.