These are chat archives for Nethereum/Nethereum

18th
Dec 2017
Vũ Đức Tuyến
@tuyen-vuduc
Dec 18 2017 04:07

@juanfranblanco Yeah, it's out at the latest version, right?

@tuyen-vuduc Your class extension to provide support for waiting for receipts is great, but I am moving everything to CQS as it is "simpler" (my hope) and avoid confusion with parameters. Nevertheless, the token service might see those features added on the meantime, or having a combination of CQS messaging and generic service classes

Vũ Đức Tuyến
@tuyen-vuduc
Dec 18 2017 04:18

My old problem is solved. Thank you for your kindly and prompt support :+1:

@tuyen-vuduc did you solve your problem? did the sample helped you?

I encounter a new issue as the same as mentioned in #119. It's used to be ok, but now it's broken on build :(
Vũ Đức Tuyến
@tuyen-vuduc
Dec 18 2017 05:05
@juanfranblanco I found it. BouncyCastle must be 1.8.1.1 :(. I did accidentally upgrade to latest version. Could you plz constraint version dependency to NEthereum packages nuspec.
Juan Blanco
@juanfranblanco
Dec 18 2017 06:38
@tuyen-vuduc if you upgrade it afterwards there is nothing I can do in my end, actually this helps in situations like windows azure functions it has a constraint for Newtonsoft but as many packages use the latest you can force a version
and also helps when you have to use 1.8.1.1 instead of 1.8.1.0 depends on the platform too
Vũ Đức Tuyến
@tuyen-vuduc
Dec 18 2017 06:44
@juanfranblanco In nuspec file, we could constraint dependency version, right? So developer couldn't upgrade to newer version if it isn't allowed.
Juan Blanco
@juanfranblanco
Dec 18 2017 06:44
like I said if you want to change it afterwards it should not be a constrain
it is the same as in AzureFunctions and the Newtonsoft library
there are too many platforms targeted, as you have found out there is a need for 1.8.1.1 in some, which cannot be found in others
Vũ Đức Tuyến
@tuyen-vuduc
Dec 18 2017 06:47
Yep, on Android, it must be 1.8.1.1. iOS is ok with the upgrade.
Juan Blanco
@juanfranblanco
Dec 18 2017 06:50
For mobile if using Forms i stick to 1.8.1.1
Note that I am refactoring the erc20 contract service, as it will be the basis for the new service code generator
Ill try not to change it "much"
but overall it is a very simple service
Vũ Đức Tuyến
@tuyen-vuduc
Dec 18 2017 06:53
That'll be ok for now. Is there anything you need help on refactoring? I might help somehow
Juan Blanco
@juanfranblanco
Dec 18 2017 06:53
feedback as an end user :)
Vũ Đức Tuyến
@tuyen-vuduc
Dec 18 2017 06:53
:) Sure.
Juan Blanco
@juanfranblanco
Dec 18 2017 06:53
thanks !
abhishek
@triston_abhi_twitter
Dec 18 2017 07:56
Hello @juanfranblanco
Is there a way that I can raise any event that transaction occurs from particular address?
I want to implement something like
User will register their address with me.
And I want to give them all details via email like
You send transaction from your address to another address
with some details
But main thing is I don't want to sync full blockchain
Juan Blanco
@juanfranblanco
Dec 18 2017 11:11
You will need to sync the blockchain at least on fast sync
You won't be able to raise an event
abhishek
@triston_abhi_twitter
Dec 18 2017 11:18
Ok I will sync blockchain.
But how I know transaction occurred on particular address?
I can do some thing like
I will check for each transaction.
If from address is related to my user address then I can get details from that transaction and send them email.
But How I can connect Geth to .net application ?
Juan Blanco
@juanfranblanco
Dec 18 2017 11:23
yes, you can do that
abhishek
@triston_abhi_twitter
Dec 18 2017 11:24
Is there any link for that?
too
to connect it is the same
Web3(geth rpc url)
like localhost:8545
then you just do something similar to
abhishek
@triston_abhi_twitter
Dec 18 2017 11:31
https://github.com/Nethereum/Nethereum.BlockchainStorage
this will store whole transactions in azure storage table ?
Juan Blanco
@juanfranblanco
Dec 18 2017 11:31
yes
and blocks
and contracts
and vm
abhishek
@triston_abhi_twitter
Dec 18 2017 11:32
So I can say whole blockchain ?
Juan Blanco
@juanfranblanco
Dec 18 2017 11:32
ha ha well not the whole blokchain, as it does not store the state of each contract
but kind of
abhishek
@triston_abhi_twitter
Dec 18 2017 11:34
Juan Blanco
@juanfranblanco
Dec 18 2017 11:35
that simplifies the stuff
one thing is the internal transactions
abhishek
@triston_abhi_twitter
Dec 18 2017 11:51
Ok Thank you
I will work on this.