Repository for the PnP JavaScript Core component development together with community members
wtf
I know I got an error because I was surprised
so, this was the error
Guid should contain 32 digits with 4 dashes (xxxxxxxx-xxxx-xxxx-xxxx-xxxxxxxxxxxx).
thanks for the help - I do need to ask though, so an
Id field can have a prefix like dec ? None of the other lists have such an id, and it's slightly concerning why this one does
i'm trying to move a file from one library to another library. Both libraries resides in the same subsite (yes i know... long story:) this is a legacy site from 2014). But i keep getting this operation is not supported error. Is it not possible to move files using pnp on subsites?
file.moveByPath(`/sites/bms/procedures/archived documents/${fileref}`,true,true) file resides on same subsite but in another library...
i used another api: https://blog.velingeorgiev.com/createcopyjobs-api-copy-move-SharePoint-files-folders worked for me... don't know if this could be deprecated (hope not)
it may be that
items.getAll() is what I need . will check ;)
I'm moving some documents to archive on a regular basis... i'm experiencing some strange error when moving a file: Save Conflict
Your changes conflict with those made concurrently by another user. If you want your changes to be applied, click Back in your Web browser, refresh the page, and resubmit your changes. CallStack -- there are nobody touching these files right now? Have you guys seen this error? it's "old" files from 2015 (if we regard that as old:) ) I am using the CreateCopyJobs api for this. These files cannot be moved manually either.
Some ideas on where to look or mayby properties to check? (these files have had in-place record holds on them (no longer), but others that also had that were moved...) #lovinIt
Are there any locations to store arbitrary configuration/settings? We currently have a mix of SharePoint and CosmosDB (delivered through Azure Functions).
I've heard it could be possible to store setting (organization-wide, and user) in Microsoft Graph, is this true?
I noticed that Apps (we use multi tenant AAD App) have "Extensions", perhaps that's something?
I've heard it could be possible to store setting (organization-wide, and user) in Microsoft Graph, is this true?
I noticed that Apps (we use multi tenant AAD App) have "Extensions", perhaps that's something?
Maybe this is what I want: https://blog.mastykarz.nl/easiest-store-user-settings-microsoft-365-app/
There's a magic path I can use:
But I wonder, must a user have special permissions to read this? (The blog post talks about writing, but only admins should do that in my case).
There's a magic path I can use:
https://graph.microsoft.com/v1.0/me/drive/special/approot:/settings.jsonBut I wonder, must a user have special permissions to read this? (The blog post talks about writing, but only admins should do that in my case).
So far so fail: Special app folder seems to be personal, I can't put shared config in there.
Application extensions could have worked, but require
Application extensions could have worked, but require
Application.Read.All permissions. This permission require admin consent which is sad, but it also grants the acquired token access to all applications.
After some research I've decided to create my own config system.
Azure Functions. Decode + JWT token, extract tenant id and app id, use that as container and blob prefix, then fetch (and cache) json from blob.
Allow update based on Roles in AAD App (also in JWT). Clear cache upon save.
Azure Functions. Decode + JWT token, extract tenant id and app id, use that as container and blob prefix, then fetch (and cache) json from blob.
Allow update based on Roles in AAD App (also in JWT). Clear cache upon save.
@koltyakov Do you think it would be possible (or too crazy, and way too late) to build a custom "sp.js"?
I don't mind sp.js, but it's a bit big, and has odd dependencies (not easy to use outside of SP).
The requests aren't very special it seems, some XML. I've tried making some manual requests and it works fine (as expected).
My idea is to write a simple generic handler, then use the types from
I'm never going to do this, but it feels it would be really nice to have, or it would have been some years ago :)
I don't mind sp.js, but it's a bit big, and has odd dependencies (not easy to use outside of SP).
The requests aren't very special it seems, some XML. I've tried making some manual requests and it works fine (as expected).
My idea is to write a simple generic handler, then use the types from
@types/sharepoint to generate the rest, and use xml2js to create the XML.I'm never going to do this, but it feels it would be really nice to have, or it would have been some years ago :)
Hey @eirikb, sorry missed lots of social messages recently.
Do you think there is a value in a separate library with JSOM nowadays? I mean for the relatively rare cases JSOM is needed you either load sp.js (no matter the size) or grab some methods XML packages to extend places where REST fails to provide a solution.
Anyways, if you have an idea how to generate JSOM XML in a generic and universal way I'm interesting to see it. As I did some CSOM XML generation for Go and there was something in PnPjs, however, I can't say that generated JSOM XML is a fun to maintain. =)
Do you think there is a value in a separate library with JSOM nowadays? I mean for the relatively rare cases JSOM is needed you either load sp.js (no matter the size) or grab some methods XML packages to extend places where REST fails to provide a solution.
Anyways, if you have an idea how to generate JSOM XML in a generic and universal way I'm interesting to see it. As I did some CSOM XML generation for Go and there was something in PnPjs, however, I can't say that generated JSOM XML is a fun to maintain. =)
Many years too late to be sure. So not anything I'm planning to spend time on, just wondering aloud. But the TS types for sp are not that old, and it would have to be generated based on those.
From my small tests a lot of the XML isn't that important, and some parts that look magical can either be hard coded or simply removed.
Only reason to try this would be if TS types + tiny XML generation (recursively) could yield a working example. Like < 300 LOC and then generate the rest.
Benefits:
From my small tests a lot of the XML isn't that important, and some parts that look magical can either be hard coded or simply removed.
Only reason to try this would be if TS types + tiny XML generation (recursively) could yield a working example. Like < 300 LOC and then generate the rest.
Benefits:
- As you said, full support for all APIs. REST is getting there, but after many years it's still not 100% AFAIC
- If you need sp, then you probably end up with these files: microsoftajax.js, init.js, sp.js, sp.runtime.js, and others when required, such as sp.taxonomy.js.
Replace all of these with "neosp.js". - Better support of async/await and MSAL
- GraphQL <- single requests to query data many "levels" down. The library API for this could be made very smooth.
I'm using sp-rest-proxy in local development but i got this error
Because you don't have cookies (or auth token) locally.
The proxy thing is probably a solution. MSAL is another. If you are going to run directly in SharePoint then proxy is probably best.
Another option for you, a simple one, is to create a new page and point to your scripts on localhost
The proxy thing is probably a solution. MSAL is another. If you are going to run directly in SharePoint then proxy is probably best.
Another option for you, a simple one, is to create a new page and point to your scripts on localhost
Hey @onur-saf you can take a look at generator-sppp. It scaffolds none spfx projects with react, pnpjs and proxy ootb. However, I didn’t update PnPjs dependency to the recent yet. Yet, using recent PnPjs is just easy as bump the dependency, remove it from webpack externals and import PnPjs due to the v2 partial import guidelines.
@onur-saf on your err screen you have conditional access lock error. You can’t workaround it rather than reaching your admins to provide you an allowed route. It can be addin only auth, user app password and allowence in cas for your user. Or none proxy but aad app reg and openidc driven client side auth.
as @eirikb mentioned
While in SPO, why you aren’t considering SPFx native approaches?
@eirikb thank you :)
also how do I make 1 list work on multiple sites but only display some particular columns on each page
Hello everyone again, I need a help about WebPartZone. I couldn't found any article or something helpfull. I need to render a WebPartZone in my reactjs application it's not SPFX Project. is it possible ?
Question for the gurus. I have a scenario where none of the options seem to fit perfectly. We have a .NET Web API hosted in Azure and need to use SharePoint for document management (custom web front-end also involved). Our tenant is large, and we are not allowed to use App permissions (which grant full control to all sites in tenant), we cannot use on-behalf-of flow, because one requirement is management of SP User Groups which again requires admin consent to a permission that is too broad ... is creating a user account and signing into SP directly from our Web API the only option? I don't see this scenario talked about often, and PnPCore, etc. require you to go the Azure App Registration route ... any other ideas? Thanks!
It seems so bizarre that App Registration scopes do not provide more granularity. There are tens of thousands of SP Sites in our tenant, we cannot safely consent to the scope that gives Full Control over all sites (though this would make life easier) ... hopefully one day they let you specify a particular site/site collection.
Just found that. Wow! Still requires admin consent... but seems like I'll have an easier time getting that granted.