Repository for the PnP JavaScript Core component development together with community members
I'm not sure what you mean, don't you use this : https://pnp.github.io/pnpjs/sp/lists/#get-list-by-id ?
so, if I have this code
const result = await sp.web.lists.getByTitle(title)();
console.log(result);I get this result
[snip}
FileSavePostProcessingEnabled: false,
ForceCheckout: false,
HasExternalDataSource: false,
Hidden: false,
Id: 'dec72266-3364-4337-94eb-c6237d8dddca',
ImagePath: {
__metadata: { type: 'SP.ResourcePath' },
DecodedUrl: '/_layouts/15/images/itgantt.png?rev=43'
},
ImageUrl: '/_layouts/15/images/itgantt.png?rev=43',
IrmEnabled: false,
IrmExpire: false,
IrmReject: false,
IsApplicationList: false,
IsCatalog: false,
IsPrivate: false,
ItemCount: 2032,
LastItemDeletedDate: '2020-11-26T08:48:38Z',
LastItemModifiedDate: '2020-11-26T10:50:47Z',
LastItemUserModifiedDate: '2020-11-26T08:51:26Z',
[snip}the Id field definitely starts with a "dec" ..
where
id is "dec72266-3364-4337-94eb-c6237d8dddca"
if I remove the "dec" the list is not found (obviously)
but if I use the "dec" it falls over as it's not a valid guid
wtf
I know I got an error because I was surprised
so, this was the error
Guid should contain 32 digits with 4 dashes (xxxxxxxx-xxxx-xxxx-xxxx-xxxxxxxxxxxx).
thanks for the help - I do need to ask though, so an
Id field can have a prefix like dec ? None of the other lists have such an id, and it's slightly concerning why this one does
i'm trying to move a file from one library to another library. Both libraries resides in the same subsite (yes i know... long story:) this is a legacy site from 2014). But i keep getting this operation is not supported error. Is it not possible to move files using pnp on subsites?
file.moveByPath(`/sites/bms/procedures/archived documents/${fileref}`,true,true) file resides on same subsite but in another library...
i used another api: https://blog.velingeorgiev.com/createcopyjobs-api-copy-move-SharePoint-files-folders worked for me... don't know if this could be deprecated (hope not)
it may be that
items.getAll() is what I need . will check ;)
I'm moving some documents to archive on a regular basis... i'm experiencing some strange error when moving a file: Save Conflict
Your changes conflict with those made concurrently by another user. If you want your changes to be applied, click Back in your Web browser, refresh the page, and resubmit your changes. CallStack -- there are nobody touching these files right now? Have you guys seen this error? it's "old" files from 2015 (if we regard that as old:) ) I am using the CreateCopyJobs api for this. These files cannot be moved manually either.
Some ideas on where to look or mayby properties to check? (these files have had in-place record holds on them (no longer), but others that also had that were moved...) #lovinIt
Are there any locations to store arbitrary configuration/settings? We currently have a mix of SharePoint and CosmosDB (delivered through Azure Functions).
I've heard it could be possible to store setting (organization-wide, and user) in Microsoft Graph, is this true?
I noticed that Apps (we use multi tenant AAD App) have "Extensions", perhaps that's something?
I've heard it could be possible to store setting (organization-wide, and user) in Microsoft Graph, is this true?
I noticed that Apps (we use multi tenant AAD App) have "Extensions", perhaps that's something?
Maybe this is what I want: https://blog.mastykarz.nl/easiest-store-user-settings-microsoft-365-app/
There's a magic path I can use:
But I wonder, must a user have special permissions to read this? (The blog post talks about writing, but only admins should do that in my case).
There's a magic path I can use:
https://graph.microsoft.com/v1.0/me/drive/special/approot:/settings.jsonBut I wonder, must a user have special permissions to read this? (The blog post talks about writing, but only admins should do that in my case).
So far so fail: Special app folder seems to be personal, I can't put shared config in there.
Application extensions could have worked, but require
Application extensions could have worked, but require
Application.Read.All permissions. This permission require admin consent which is sad, but it also grants the acquired token access to all applications.
After some research I've decided to create my own config system.
Azure Functions. Decode + JWT token, extract tenant id and app id, use that as container and blob prefix, then fetch (and cache) json from blob.
Allow update based on Roles in AAD App (also in JWT). Clear cache upon save.
Azure Functions. Decode + JWT token, extract tenant id and app id, use that as container and blob prefix, then fetch (and cache) json from blob.
Allow update based on Roles in AAD App (also in JWT). Clear cache upon save.
@koltyakov Do you think it would be possible (or too crazy, and way too late) to build a custom "sp.js"?
I don't mind sp.js, but it's a bit big, and has odd dependencies (not easy to use outside of SP).
The requests aren't very special it seems, some XML. I've tried making some manual requests and it works fine (as expected).
My idea is to write a simple generic handler, then use the types from
I'm never going to do this, but it feels it would be really nice to have, or it would have been some years ago :)
I don't mind sp.js, but it's a bit big, and has odd dependencies (not easy to use outside of SP).
The requests aren't very special it seems, some XML. I've tried making some manual requests and it works fine (as expected).
My idea is to write a simple generic handler, then use the types from
@types/sharepoint to generate the rest, and use xml2js to create the XML.I'm never going to do this, but it feels it would be really nice to have, or it would have been some years ago :)