Where communities thrive


  • Join over 1.5M+ people
  • Join over 100K+ communities
  • Free without limits
  • Create your own community
People
Repo info
Activity
  • Aug 24 16:35
    rom1504 commented #97
  • Aug 24 16:33

    rom1504 on master

    Release 1.6.10 (compare)

  • Aug 24 16:31

    rom1504 on master

    add gitpod and fix gitmodules (compare)

  • Aug 24 16:29
    rom1504 closed #65
  • Aug 24 16:29
    rom1504 commented #65
  • Aug 24 16:28
    rom1504 closed #53
  • Aug 24 16:28
    rom1504 commented #53
  • Aug 24 16:28
    rom1504 closed #52
  • Aug 24 16:28
    rom1504 commented #52
  • Aug 24 16:27
    rom1504 closed #51
  • Aug 24 16:27
    rom1504 commented #51
  • Aug 24 16:26

    rom1504 on master

    Fixed issue #97 Merge pull request #97 from mrc… (compare)

  • Aug 24 16:26
    rom1504 closed #97
  • Aug 24 15:58
    mrcrille commented #97
  • Aug 24 15:23
    mrcrille commented #97
  • Aug 24 15:20
    mrcrille commented #97
  • Aug 24 15:18
    mrcrille opened #97
  • Aug 24 15:11
    rom1504 commented #97
  • Aug 24 15:06
    mrcrille opened #97
  • Mar 12 10:08
    SuperOP535 closed #92
Hans Elias J.
@hansihe
I would normally not use the GPL, but I feel like this is one of the very few situations where it really fits well
William Gaylord
@wgaylord
still....
Robin Lambertz
@roblabla
you may use the compiler output in your proprietary program
mhsjlw
@mhsjlw
no , 'still' is not how I feel
Robin Lambertz
@roblabla
You just can't change the compiler to do new stuff without open sourcing it
Hans Elias J.
@hansihe
the only thing using the gpl for this will do is prevent some company from nicking it and improving without contributing back
mhsjlw
@mhsjlw
Firstly I feel like the gpl is a fantasy
you can't enforce half this shit
I prefer encouraging
Robin Lambertz
@roblabla
@mhsjlw it's not a problem of enforcing
it's a problem of communicating intent
MIT is more or less "IDGAF"
William Gaylord
@wgaylord
no
mhsjlw
@mhsjlw
not threatening to hit you with a stick in the dark where I can't see you
Robin Lambertz
@roblabla
GPL is "Play nice".
mhsjlw
@mhsjlw
funny,
William Gaylord
@wgaylord
GPL is you can only add stuff if I can have it too.
Robin Lambertz
@roblabla
I think it's a really good choice actually. If (and only if) we can make sure it doesn't screw over people who need proprietary native types
mhsjlw
@mhsjlw
bukkit 100% was a play nice situation
William Gaylord
@wgaylord
yep
:P
Robin Lambertz
@roblabla
CraftBukkit wasn't.
they got what they deserved
William Gaylord
@wgaylord
Craftbukkit was LGPL with a linked GPL......
Robin Lambertz
@roblabla
I warned them a gazillion times.
CraftBukkit contained proprietary code
it couldn't be LGPL or GPL or whatever else
William Gaylord
@wgaylord
LGPL lets you do that...
Robin Lambertz
@roblabla
No, it doesn't.
William Gaylord
@wgaylord
you can link to closed source code in LGPL...
Hans Elias J.
@hansihe
LGPL doesn't let you relicense other code to it
Robin Lambertz
@roblabla
It didn't link it
it tried to relicense proprietary code
William Gaylord
@wgaylord
They never claimed Mojang code as LGLP..
LGPL
Robin Lambertz
@roblabla
CraftBukkit contains the minecraft source code, which is All Rights Reserved
Yes they did
That's literally what they did
mhsjlw
@mhsjlw
^
William Gaylord
@wgaylord
they claimed there patches
Robin Lambertz
@roblabla
Nope
Hans Elias J.
@hansihe
Craftbukkit was largely decompiled proprietary mojang code
mhsjlw
@mhsjlw
^^^
Robin Lambertz
@roblabla
@chibill that's what spigot does
Hans Elias J.
@hansihe
Spigot is patches
Robin Lambertz
@roblabla
and spigot does it right.
mhsjlw
@mhsjlw
um
William Gaylord
@wgaylord
spigot = modded craftbukkit......
Robin Lambertz
@roblabla
CraftBukkit, back when the shitstorm happened, was just the the minecraft source, changed.
mhsjlw
@mhsjlw
From what understand spigot is still breaking the license