Where communities thrive


  • Join over 1.5M+ people
  • Join over 100K+ communities
  • Free without limits
  • Create your own community
People
Repo info
Activity
  • 12:32
    cartant edited #5158
  • 12:31
    cartant edited #5158
  • 11:18
    tomwhite007 opened #5159
  • 10:48
    cartant synchronize #5158
  • 10:46
    cartant review_requested #5158
  • 10:46
    cartant commented #5158
  • 10:45
    cartant synchronize #5158
  • 10:44
    cartant edited #5158
  • 10:39
    cartant edited #5158
  • 07:49
    cartant commented #5158
  • 06:33
    kwonoj commented #5158
  • 06:33
    kwonoj commented #5158
  • 06:31
    cartant opened #5158
  • 04:33
    cartant commented #5157
  • 03:42
    thefliik commented #5157
  • 03:32
    thefliik commented #5157
  • 03:32
    thefliik commented #5157
  • 03:29
    cartant commented #5157
  • 03:28
    thefliik edited #5157
  • 03:27
    thefliik edited #5157
Dorus
@Dorus
You should test it. But i dont think this will allow second$ to emit once first is done, not after the initial burst.
Idk, does firstSubject$ remember it completed?
Renke Grunwald
@renke
oh, i see the factory is called on each emit of second$?
Dorus
@Dorus
@renke Quick test does show it works. I said nothing :D https://rxviz.com/v/B8ZABXaJ
Actually, thinking back, i think the subject stays in completion status and will emit complete() right away once you subscribe again on new commits from second$
So that's a very neat solution
Renke Grunwald
@renke
it feels a bit more natural so to say
that aside, thanks for your help, I think I learned a lot here, especially about publish
Dorus
@Dorus
Glad to help, i was half asleep yesterday so it's a miracle i gave at least somewhat working code xD
Renke Grunwald
@renke
it certainly pushed me into the right direction, although your shareReplay snippet confused me a bit :-D
Dorus
@Dorus
it's like publish but with a replaySubject backing the inner stream.
Just a ranom brainwave of mine i guess :P
I do like this new found way to using delayWhen. gotta memorize it.
Renke Grunwald
@renke
I am still puzzled why there is no publishReplay that takes a selector function though. Does that not make sense or why does only publish support that.
Dorus
@Dorus
https://rxjs.dev/api/operators/publishReplay does show selectorOrScheduler
@renke
Renke Grunwald
@renke
Oh, I see, maybe was looking at shareReplay which seem to lack it indeed
Dorus
@Dorus
@renke Oops, my mistake. I named shareReplay and i also forgot to set the first 2 params. Idk i always confuse share and publish, even thou i know very well what they do.
Will Mruzek
@mruzekw

Hi there, say I have a high-order observable. It basically contains a set of set of numbers.

I'd like the first inner observable to be listened to until the next inner observable is available. Then the next one should be listened to. I know there's switchMap, but I can't seem to get it to work.

const setOfSetOfNums$ = merge(
  of([4,5,6,7]).pipe(delay(50)),
  of([0,1,2,3]),
).pipe(
  distinctUntilChanged(),
  switchMap(context => of(...context)),
)

zip(interval(1000), setOfSetOfNums$).pipe(
  map(([_, hand]) => hand),
)

I would expect this to output something like:

---0---1---4---5---6---7--->

But it spits out:

---0---1---2---3---4---5---6---7--->

Derek
@derekkite
@mruzekw not quite clear what you need. 0-1-? or 0 - 4 - 5 - 6 - 7 - 1 then what? maybe describe what you are trying to accomplish
Will Mruzek
@mruzekw
I would like the delayed observable to interrupt the non-delayed one
Thus the desired output of ---0---1---4---5---6---7--->
In actuality, it's a user event that generates a new set of nums to listen to, but this should replicate the idea...I think?
If there's a new observable in setOfSetOfNums$, we should immediately switch to that
Dorus
@Dorus
@mruzekw the problem is you zip after switchMap
thus you have them first emit all events at the same time, and then queue up at zip after the switchMap
Observables have no so called backpressure
Derek
@derekkite
of(4,5,6,7).pipe(
    delay(50), 
    switchMap((of(1,2,3,4))
)
Dorus
@Dorus
That's not even valid code
Will Mruzek
@mruzekw
@Dorus There's no way to add any backpressure?
Would it be any different if a click was the trigger to switch observables?
Derek
@derekkite
@mruzekw there are examples of a search bar where the event triggers an http call that is interrupted via switchmap if the user types something more.
Will Mruzek
@mruzekw
To make this even simpler, is there a way to receive a stream of numbers one at a time? Say when I click a button?
Karsten Pruehss
@kpruehss
@mruzekw if you want a stream of individual numbers rather then all the numbers at once, you should use from() instead of of() i think
Will Mruzek
@mruzekw
I mean, I'm sure I can create a stream of numbers with either one
The question is getting each num one at a time
Err, per click in this case
Dorus
@Dorus
@mruzekw You could put zip before the switchMap, or inside.
const setOfSetOfNums$ = merge(
  of([4,5,6,7]).pipe(delay(50)),
  of([0,1,2,3]),
).pipe(
  switchMap(context => zip(interval(1000), from(context))),
  map(([_, hand]) => hand)
)
Will Mruzek
@mruzekw
Thanks, @Dorus! That worked
Now is there a way to do a head-tail type operation on an observable?
Dorus
@Dorus
There is finalize or concat to add actions on the tail. Or just use the complete callback.
I'm not exactly sure what you mean
Will Mruzek
@mruzekw
Well, I'd like the first value of an observable to pass through, but the rest be released on click
So I was thinking I could split and merge
Something like
        return concat(
          handsToDeal$.pipe(
            first(),
            map(hand => [null, hand])
          )
          zip(dealIntent$, handsToDeal$.pipe(skip(1)))
        )
Dorus
@Dorus
zip(source, fromEvent(el, 'click').pipe(startWith()))
this does queue the clicks, that might not be intended
source.pipe(concatMap(e => fromEvent(el, 'click').pipe(mapTo(e))))
Will Mruzek
@mruzekw
startWith() without a arg just uses the first value in the stream?