Where communities thrive


  • Join over 1.5M+ people
  • Join over 100K+ communities
  • Free without limits
  • Create your own community
People
Activity
  • Jul 29 18:19
    ajhodges removed as member
  • Jul 29 18:19
    ajhodges removed as member
  • Jul 29 18:19
    mlclay removed as member
  • Jul 29 18:19
    mlclay removed as member
  • Feb 22 02:50
    kevingduck closed #235
  • Jan 18 20:24
    ajhodges added as member
  • Jan 18 20:24
    ajhodges added as member
  • Jan 18 20:24
    mlclay added as member
  • Jan 18 20:24
    mlclay added as member
  • Jan 09 16:18
    kevingduck closed #234
  • Jan 09 10:00
    NuclearDog commented #235
  • Jan 09 02:15
    kevingduck opened #235
  • Jan 09 02:07
    kevingduck opened #234
  • Oct 28 2020 17:35

    ajhodges on limits

    Document upload file size limits (compare)

  • Oct 27 2020 21:01
    dependabot[bot] labeled #98
  • Oct 27 2020 21:01
    dependabot[bot] opened #98
  • Oct 27 2020 21:01

    dependabot[bot] on npm_and_yarn

    Bump systeminformation from 4.2… (compare)

  • Oct 27 2020 19:02
    jamesfneyer synchronize #233
  • Oct 27 2020 19:02

    jamesfneyer on modify-carrier-slug

    Add check for no carriers retur… (compare)

  • Oct 27 2020 18:46
    jamesfneyer commented #233
Adam Hodges
@ajhodges
You can follow our team here https://stats.foldingathome.org/team/245213 keep in mind that folding@home is having trouble keeping up with the influx of new volunteers so they aren't fully utilizing everything we're making available to them yet, but they've been working on scaling their infra and keeping jobs in the pool for everyone to work on
Also feel free to use our team ID and contribute your own idle computing power!
Also, that stats page only updates a couple times a day
Github-shipchain
@Github-shipchain
That's very cool Adam, thanks for sharing.
Everyone fyi we have informed the community on Telegram about yesterday's talks on Gitter along these lines:
  • LOOM's leadership has changed earlier this quarter. 2 co founders out 3 have now left to new endeavors.
  • As a result, the new CEO has informed shipchain yesterday that LOOM would drastically reduce their development of Basechain's open source code and SDK and focus on private development from now on.
  • The main consequence of this pivot is that Shipchain Inc. would have to under take more development responsibility than initially planned (split so far was Shipchain Inc = the dApps, Loom = the sidechain, Loom+Shipchain = integration of the 2).
  • John Monarch has outlined it as the lead option they were leaning on but also proposed to validators yesterday to explore alternatives such as Matic or Cosmos.
  • We've now entered an informal consultation period of likely few days where criteria such as development skills, timings, funding, scalability vs decentralization and token economics are being openly discussed.
  • Whichever option is chosen, it has been guaranteed that the SHIP token would remain the native token of the network.
  • John Monarch took the opportunity to inform us that ShipChain was approached recently by the new leader of the BiTA organization and opened discussions about Shipchain providing our sidechain and standards to them, assisting in development, and having their members on their technical + standards committee be a part of what we are doing as third party developers and enhancing the community.
  • Exchanges of yesterday outlined a couple of key arguments in favor of plan A = Loom's SDK: no more development was required from Loom to launch the mainnet and move txs to the sidechain / this route is compatible with the BiTA opportunity mentioned above. Having said that, the undeniable shift of resources would certainly imply some delays in Shipchain's development roadmap.
  • COVID-19 forced all Shipchain Inc members to WFH and adapt their internal communication methods adding to those delays. Nevertheless it was estimated that should we stay with plan A, mainnet launch would still be feasible within April (2-4 wks delay) should we get a clear consensus from validators relatively quickly.
  • All details available on Gitter.
Github-shipchain
@Github-shipchain
Welcome The Rocketter. Welcome on board. Recent news about a surge of interests from the BiTA itself may be even be more bullish in the short and mid term than contributing the Baseline Protocol. The next step is for ShipChain Inc to double check and confirm which protocol is the right one for our sidechain. Right now our testnet runs on Loom's SDK which is the only platform we know with full EVM compatibility and a battle tested dPoS consensus. Loom's mainnet went live more than a year ago. You will read more on Gitter why there is a need to recheck all alternatives though.
The Rocketeer
@BrissettAsha_twitter
Hi and thanks for the welcome. What is the BiTA? I understand that the Loom protocols commitments have changed and that Cosmos and Matic are looking as viable options for migration. Would the migration be the launch of Shipchains mainnet?
In regards to the Shiptoken I understand that Shipchain Inc does not partake in exchange listing fees, which I am happy to hear. Are there any plans of listing the token of DEX's such as kyberswap?
Github-shipchain
@Github-shipchain
Come over here and let's exchange further
🚚 The ShipChain Community 🚚
SHIPCHAIN, THE END-TO-END LOGISTICS PLATFORM OF THE FUTURE: TRUSTLESS & TRANSPARENT TRACKING.
https://t.me/shipchainunofficial
This is the answer to your first question: https://www.bita.studio/
And yes some of us are in touch with shipchain's legal team to find out if there is a way to trigger new exchange listing and still be compliant with current regulatory frameworks.
The Rocketeer
@BrissettAsha_twitter
I can see why you would be excited about joining an organisation like that. Thank you for the link to the telegram.
ShipChainEurope
@ShipChainEurope
@ajhodges you might want to update the copyright on the main website to 2020
Adam Hodges
@ajhodges
Thanks for reporting, but I am actually not involved with the marketing website at all. I will try to pass that along for you
ShipChainEurope
@ShipChainEurope
@ajhodges I know you aren't. But I wouldn't know how to report it more direct ;) john is probably flooded with PM's on Tellegram right now. Thx anyway!
The answer is 42 Crypto Cats
@katmaiBeast_twitter
random but if you're an ubuntu user
here's an easier way to manage networking
royaljelly2018
@royaljelly2018
https://portal.shipchain.io/login/ < on the bottom it says (c) 2019 ;)
Github-shipchain
@Github-shipchain
image.png
is there a Shipchain Inc. team that I could join on Folding@Home?
Github-shipchain
@Github-shipchain
found it
image.png
GoZippy
@GoZippy
Just found this project - anyone want to tell me a little more about the project? Who is behind it and how a 300 person freight brokerage might jump in and use this or help?
Github-shipchain
@Github-shipchain
Hello, I'm Nick aka shipmateFRnl one of the Blockchain node validators on https://network.shipchain.io. Not employed by Shipchain Inc. This blockchain is decentralized. You will find official ways to contact the team here: https://shipchain.io/contact (although John Monarch the CEO may see your message on Gitter too).
To deep dive, I found this recent article to outline greatly the opportunity of introducing blockchain and IoT technologies and the ongoing need to come up with data standards.
https://cargonow.world/use-of-blockchain-within-supply-chain-october-2020/
If you are also interested to understand the blockchain engine behind that Track and Trace product you will also find community articles in here: https://medium.com/shipchain-un-official-community
The best way to research employees at shipchain is look this employer up on LinkedIn - you should find about 25-30 employees - as the whitepaper from 2017 is now relatively out of date and the Teams page on shipchain.io has apparently been removed.
ShipChainEurope
@ShipChainEurope
Hi all, Could someone say if testnet-beta is still up and running? @ajhodges @johnmonarch ? We would like to explore the more advanced setups without risking productive downtime. If so what would be the URL to reach the validator overview ?