@hreintke I experiment with last ver of WebSkeletonApp like in PR to separate ApplicationClass as library.. this opens new possibility of writing wifi+web enabled apps with further possibility of costless upgrade when ApplicationClass upgrade..
In a sense the application class is a more structured approach to having global/static functions and variables - just my 2 cents. :smile: - still liking the structure as an example
Also I wonder what's the difference for you between init() and start() - it's also somewhat redundant since you call them from init() in a linear way
@hreintke I have the same environment vars - does "String" properly resolve in your eclipse? I wonder if I am missing something - because of this "error" some proper declarations/function calls using String are marked as wrong - which is a bit of annoying when screening trough the code
@patrickjahns Init is just ONCE called, and start can be called several times.
I do not insist to include my app clas t Sming.. I just think many newcommers and oldcommers will find it usefull.. and it can be upgraded later, and if no breacking changes, user application can benefit from being based on app class..
in general - any abstraction, any generalization is not suit for ALL cases.. thus we have plain Sming. And even more - plain SDK..
Moreover we can (of course if community find it useful at all!) create several basic application classes as good starting point for different kind of apps..