it is a semantic namespace and lots of things can utilize it which are not wikipedia themselves
so it becomes a de-facto namespace
ex: dbpedia, which is RDF/semantic layer over wikipedia
so the identifiers one would use to refer to a concept would depend on that
if there is a conflict there is a conflict but the conflict may be more important than the individual point any participant in the conflict may want to push
and it would include them too, indirectly
another point about wikipedia is that it is trans-language
the different natural language names for a concept resolve to the same concept
this is something DNS wasnt designed for
they will ultimately just sell the different names to the highest bidder
in a logic system the similarity of terms would be logical concepts themselves
automenta
@automenta
and in something like NARS they can have different 'truth' strength
the truth being something that could subjectively depend on each client/browser/peer configuration