Where communities thrive


  • Join over 1.5M+ people
  • Join over 100K+ communities
  • Free without limits
  • Create your own community
People
Repo info
Activity
  • Jan 22 08:22
    firejune synchronize #1537
  • Jan 22 02:25
    lierdakil closed #1541
  • Jan 21 11:07
    lierdakil synchronize #1541
  • Jan 21 05:46
    firejune edited #1541
  • Jan 21 04:47
    firejune opened #1541
  • Jan 21 02:01
    firejune synchronize #1537
  • Jan 21 01:36
    firejune synchronize #1537
  • Jan 21 00:01
    github-actions[bot] closed #181
  • Jan 20 15:49
    kulikalov opened #1540
  • Jan 20 00:04
    lierdakil closed #1535
  • Jan 20 00:01
    github-actions[bot] closed #231
  • Jan 20 00:01
    github-actions[bot] closed #316
  • Jan 20 00:01
    github-actions[bot] closed #398
  • Jan 20 00:01
    github-actions[bot] closed #780
  • Jan 20 00:01
    github-actions[bot] closed #800
  • Jan 20 00:01
    github-actions[bot] closed #801
  • Jan 19 00:01
    github-actions[bot] closed #803
  • Jan 19 00:01
    github-actions[bot] closed #807
  • Jan 19 00:01
    github-actions[bot] closed #808
  • Jan 19 00:01
    github-actions[bot] closed #811
Micah Zoltu
@MicahZoltu
A lot of mobile apps are just browsers that can only navigate to one page. Phones actually have a compelling reason for native apps (performance).
Mike Graham
@cmichaelgraham
my 15 year old says there is an add to home screen option with the links for ios on iphone :)
Micah Zoltu
@MicahZoltu
Though, I would still rather companies just make a good mobile web experience.
Haha, your 15 year old would know best. :)
Mike Graham
@cmichaelgraham
yeah - i'm 50. very old school :)
Micah Zoltu
@MicahZoltu
How do you capture this in ES5?
In ES6 I would do let lambda = () => this.method(), in ES5 the best I have found so far is self = this; let lambda = function() { self.method() }.
Is there an easier way?
Mike Graham
@cmichaelgraham
i'm pretty sure that's what the typescript compiler generates for you
when it transpiles to es5
Jonathan Park
@park9140
basically. It generates an _this variable.
Mike Graham
@cmichaelgraham
yeah
something for you to capture
Jonathan Park
@park9140
It's a pain when you debug and have source maps on
Micah Zoltu
@MicahZoltu
Okay. :/ I normally work in TypeScript, but in this case I have to patch a bug in a third party library which is in ES5.
Speaking of TypeScript, I can't wait until Aurelia can use JSPM vNext so I can use the SystemJS runtime transpiler!
So exciting.
Mike Graham
@cmichaelgraham
Micah Zoltu
@MicahZoltu
Yeah, I am familiar with the work you have done to get type definitions for Aurelia. I haven't used any of it because I am waiting on Microsoft/TypeScript#2338
In particular, the workflow for external type definitions blows at the moment and I don't feel like putting in the time to deal with it until there is some sanity (standardization) around what the long term goals for TS are.
Mike Graham
@cmichaelgraham
makes perfect sense.
Dima Kuzmich
@forforeach
Hi, I try to use atom-typescript with angular and get next error Experimental support for decorators is a feature that is subject to change in a future release. Specify '--experimentalDecorators' to remove this warning.
Anyone know how to handle it?
Nelo Mitranim
@Mitranim
"experimentalDecorators": true in your tsconfig
Dima Kuzmich
@forforeach
@Mitranim thanks
Miguel Couto
@Mig1st4ck
i upgraded to latest version 4.8.1
now when i press F6 to do a full build
it generate 4 Builds
what is happening???
Basarat Ali Syed
@basarat
build.gif
@Mig1st4ck I am getting a single build as seen ^
Miguel Couto
@Mig1st4ck
i think the problem is with the upgrade.
something like a server is running listening for F6, then when i upgrade a new server is started, but the old is still runing,
since i had my Atom open for several days and did some upgrades i should have had 3 instances of the server running so 3 builds
after i restart Atom i got a single build.
Jonathan Park
@park9140
@basarat, do you use Timecop?
I’m curious why the package load time is 600ms while the activation time is only ~30-40ms
I’m curious why the package load time is 600ms while the activation time is only 34ms
Basarat Ali Syed
@basarat
@park9140 Haven't profiled it yet. Still feature churning
@park9140 think its the worker starting ... but not sure (i.e. doesn't sound right)
Basarat Ali Syed
@basarat
Thanks @park9140 ! atom/atom#7638 created : TypeStrong/atom-typescript#428
Jonathan Park
@park9140
@basarat, I might take a couple swings at optimizing load time this weekend.
Cu3PO42
@Cu3PO42
@basarat Just saw you comment on #418. I can’t seem to reproduce that, though EDIT: nvm, was my theme being wonky. working on it!
Cu3PO42
@Cu3PO42
Got if fixed and PR sent (#430). That was a quick one :)
Basarat Ali Syed
@basarat
@Cu3PO42 if you get the
Chance run "apm publish patch"
Cu3PO42
@Cu3PO42
@basarat I’d love to, but I don’t think I can do that without having the 5.0.1 tag on upstream and I can’t push that there obviously… am I supposed to create a PR for that?
@Cu3PO42 I added you as a collaborator ... accept that and then you can push ;)
Cu3PO42
@Cu3PO42
@basarat I’m afraid I didn’t receive an invite
Basarat Ali Syed
@basarat
blob