Where communities thrive


  • Join over 1.5M+ people
  • Join over 100K+ communities
  • Free without limits
  • Create your own community
People
Repo info
Activity
    Stuart P. Bentley
    @stuartpb
    I'll see about making a PR to vendor the W3C CoC in
    What avenue do people have if they want to add something to the W3C Code of Conduct?
    Marcos Cáceres
    @marcoscaceres
    @stuartpb we would need to talk to the W3c
    Stuart P. Bentley
    @stuartpb
    Is there no public line of dialogue for that?
    Marcos Cáceres
    @marcoscaceres
    @stuartpb not right now, no
    We should set that up if there is an issue
    Stuart P. Bentley
    @stuartpb
    Sure
    And make it clear that we're willing to do so
    To be clear, it's this one, right? http://www.w3.org/Consortium/cepc/
    Marcos Cáceres
    @marcoscaceres
    @stuartpb yessir
    @stuartpb make sure you "@" my username to get my attention. Otherwise I will miss what you say :(
    Stuart P. Bentley
    @stuartpb
    ok
    marcoscaceres @marcoscaceres has gitter, skype, IRC, iMessage, slack etc.... instant chat overlaod
    stuartpb @stuartpb is designing one more, too
    Marcos Cáceres
    @marcoscaceres
    :clap: :shipit:
    Stuart P. Bentley
    @stuartpb
    The idea is to better solve the use cases for all the ones you mentioned except Skype (Skype, being primarily video-oriented, is a different project)
    Michael[tm] Smith
    @sideshowbarker
    The process for getting any changes into the Code of Conduct is to send proposals to the Positive Work Environment TF public-pwe@w3.org
    Marcos Cáceres
    @marcoscaceres
    @stuartpb ^^^
    again, there is nothing to do about that right now
    Stuart P. Bentley
    @stuartpb
    Yeah, I sent them an email earlier asking if they could state the copyright terms the document is under on the document itself
    I'll note the address and list for discussion (https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-pwe/) in the README
    Michael[tm] Smith
    @sideshowbarker
    Coralie is the best person to follow up with directly about this stuff
    And/or sending a message to @w3c on twitter
    because she is very responsive to those as well
    Marcos Cáceres
    @marcoscaceres
    @stuartpb WICG/admin#17
    Stuart P. Bentley
    @stuartpb
    So long as it's clear to prospective users that the WICG, and the W3C in general, is a safe space where misconduct is discouraged / intolerated
    @marcoscaceres I'd preserve the glossary links if possible
    I might send a separate PR for that
    Marcos Cáceres
    @marcoscaceres
    yeah, let's do a seperate PR for that
    Stuart P. Bentley
    @stuartpb
    also I'd make the numbers not all be "1" so it's not confusing for editors
    Marcos Cáceres
    @marcoscaceres
    @stuartpb the "1" is better, as markdown automatically numbers them correctly. Otherwise it gets messy trying to move things around
    Stuart P. Bentley
    @stuartpb
    I know it's a pain to maintain and Markdown doesn't require it but it makes it a lot less "wait what huh" when you're trying to find the spot you were trying to contribute to

    Okay, I'm going to change number 7 to say... wait, what? These all say "1." Where's the line I was trying to edit? It was the one that started "user agents must not" - oh, wait, that's, like, all of them.

    etc

    Marcos Cáceres
    @marcoscaceres
    I have to disagree with you there, unfortunately.
    Stuart P. Bentley
    @stuartpb
    meh, I'm +0 about it
    :+0:
    Marcos Cáceres
    @marcoscaceres
    heh
    @stuartpb, good point about https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-pwe/
    Stuart P. Bentley
    @stuartpb
    Linking to http://www.w3.org/Consortium/pwe/#Procedures is also important to make it clear what the procedure is
    Though on Discourse users should use the flag
    And should use it liberally (ie, whenever the conversation veers beyond the boundaries of professional disagreement)
    Marcos Cáceres
    @marcoscaceres
    @stuartpb added link
    • additional text
    Stuart P. Bentley
    @stuartpb
    In fact while we're at it http://discourse.wicg.io/tos and particularly http://discourse.wicg.io/tos#9 should probably get edited now that the Discourse is under W3C rules
    Marcos Cáceres
    @marcoscaceres
    Yeah, will do that seperately
    this will do for now tho
    Stuart P. Bentley
    @stuartpb
    I still think the PR should specifically mention the Discourse moderation procedures
    since those are way more accessible
    and they keep the Discourse very tidy
    Marcos Cáceres
    @marcoscaceres
    Added link to discourse tos