I am honestly not sure how this works for remote applications, maybe sending such information if there is internet access available (after consent from the user). Found this article, it might help: https://techcommunity.microsoft.com/t5/windows-dev-appconsult/add-telemetry-to-your-electron-application-with-application/ba-p/802091.
Basically, this can be done by using the Application Insights SDK by setting up for a free-tier of Azure.
Basically, this can be done by using the Application Insights SDK by setting up for a free-tier of Azure.
Also, I opened an issue regarding a new feature. nexB/scancode-workbench#446. Let me know what do you think. I implemented a similar thing in my organization platform and we discovered countless minor issues, all thanks to this feature.
Created a welcome page. Let me know your reviews.
There is a significant performance hit when generating the filters on a large scan file. Having them run automatically might significantly degrade the user experience if all you want to do is look at results and dont plan on using filters.
That being said, the filter value generation can most certainly be improved in multiple ways, including running in the background etc. So there is a lot of room for improvement.
Okay, I get it now, so does it makes sense to have a "Clear Filters" options? I mean I understand it can be used if the user wants to use the filters initially and later just need to look at the results, but is he even aware that the filters degrade the performance so he should "Clear" them if he doesn't need them.
@nitin10s We only have a basic documentation in ReadTheDocs at this time. We may have a Google Season of Docs project in this area, but otherwise updating and improving as best we can. More information about filters is high priority. It also seems (my experience) that the time it takes to activate filters is dependent on how many columns you are displaying. So perhaps the next step is to figure out to collect statistics for filters so that we have stats to work with.
I understand work on the documentation is required. I am just suggesting rather than having different buttons for Activate Filters and Clear Filters, we can have something like:
- The Activate Filters when clicked, changes the button text to Clear Filters, or
- There is a toggle button to activate/clear the filters.
Toggles are the best in this case for interaction since the choice is binary [whether to have filters or not]
Please put your views on this: nexB/scancode-workbench#508
Can you have a look at the failing check on my PR
nexB/scancode-workbench#509
nexB/scancode-workbench#509
Looking great :bow:
1 reply
and the build script is updated to Python 3
we have to keep different python versions or different Linux images
And exactly which versions for the chosen one
i couldn't attend weekly meeting,
is there any feature that I can work on
is there any feature that I can work on
I just did
yes for 446
i just want to know if that PR is still meaningful or not
if not then it can be closed
if yes, then I can select one of the latest available issue templates
if yes, then I can select one of the latest available issue templates