Where communities thrive


  • Join over 1.5M+ people
  • Join over 100K+ communities
  • Free without limits
  • Create your own community
People
Activity
  • May 25 23:40

    dependabot[bot] on npm_and_yarn

    (compare)

  • May 25 23:39
    dependabot[bot] closed #521
  • May 25 23:39
    dependabot[bot] commented #521
  • May 25 23:39
    dependabot[bot] labeled #526
  • May 25 23:39
    dependabot[bot] labeled #526
  • May 25 23:39
    dependabot[bot] opened #526
  • May 25 23:39

    dependabot[bot] on npm_and_yarn

    Bump grunt from 1.4.1 to 1.5.3 … (compare)

  • May 18 06:13
    OmkarPh edited #525
  • May 18 05:39
    OmkarPh opened #525
  • May 16 17:17
    dependabot[bot] labeled #524
  • May 16 17:17
    dependabot[bot] labeled #524
  • May 16 17:17
    dependabot[bot] opened #524
  • May 16 17:17

    dependabot[bot] on npm_and_yarn

    Bump plist from 3.0.4 to 3.0.5 … (compare)

  • May 12 13:18
    OmkarPh commented #520
  • May 12 13:18
    OmkarPh commented #520
  • May 11 19:23
  • May 11 17:39
    AyanSinhaMahapatra commented #519
  • May 11 17:26
    AyanSinhaMahapatra commented #520
  • May 11 17:26
    AyanSinhaMahapatra commented #520
  • May 11 17:26
    AyanSinhaMahapatra commented #520
Pratik Dey
@Pratikrocks
@nitin10s nice UI 🤓
Nitin Singhal
@nitin10s
Thanks :smile:
Nitin Singhal
@nitin10s
I had a minor query. Are the "Show All" and "HIde all" option in Table View even important enough (used by users) to be displayed?
Steven Esser
@steven-esser
I personally use "Hide All" regularly to reset the columns I want to see. I have not used "Show All" on purpose ever.
Nitin Singhal
@nitin10s
Would it be good if we shift both of these, inside the Column Visibility section? Currently, there are too many filters and options to process. But as you mentioned you use it regularly, we might want to leave the Hide All option outside. I'll try to come up with a solution
Nitin Singhal
@nitin10s
One more question, why does the user need to explicitly click on Activate Filters to be allowed to use filters rather than using them normally. I am not sure I understand the purpose clearly. It would be great if someone could briefly explain. Thanks in advance.
Steven Esser
@steven-esser

There is a significant performance hit when generating the filters on a large scan file. Having them run automatically might significantly degrade the user experience if all you want to do is look at results and dont plan on using filters.

That being said, the filter value generation can most certainly be improved in multiple ways, including running in the background etc. So there is a lot of room for improvement.

Nitin Singhal
@nitin10s
Okay, I get it now, so does it makes sense to have a "Clear Filters" options? I mean I understand it can be used if the user wants to use the filters initially and later just need to look at the results, but is he even aware that the filters degrade the performance so he should "Clear" them if he doesn't need them.
Michael Herzog
@mjherzog
@nitin10s We only have a basic documentation in ReadTheDocs at this time. We may have a Google Season of Docs project in this area, but otherwise updating and improving as best we can. More information about filters is high priority. It also seems (my experience) that the time it takes to activate filters is dependent on how many columns you are displaying. So perhaps the next step is to figure out to collect statistics for filters so that we have stats to work with.
Nitin Singhal
@nitin10s

I understand work on the documentation is required. I am just suggesting rather than having different buttons for Activate Filters and Clear Filters, we can have something like:

  1. The Activate Filters when clicked, changes the button text to Clear Filters, or
  2. There is a toggle button to activate/clear the filters.

Toggles are the best in this case for interaction since the choice is binary [whether to have filters or not]

Nitin Singhal
@nitin10s
Also, views on nexB/scancode-workbench#381 ? I could redesign it if we finalize things.
Omkar Phansopkar
@OmkarPh
Are scancode-workbench maintainers still active here?
Please put your views on this: nexB/scancode-workbench#508
Philippe Ombredanne
@pombredanne
@OmkarPh yes! thanks :)
Omkar Phansopkar
@OmkarPh
Hi @pombredanne
Can you have a look at the failing check on my PR
nexB/scancode-workbench#509
Philippe Ombredanne
@pombredanne
@OmkarPh done :)
Looking great :bow:
1 reply
Omkar Phansopkar
@OmkarPh
Hi, is there any feature for workbench for me to work on?
Philippe Ombredanne
@pombredanne
@OmkarPh first step would be to ensure we have a proper CI working :)
and the build script is updated to Python 3
Omkar Phansopkar
@OmkarPh
Hi @pombredanne can you review this nexB/scancode-workbench#511
Omkar Phansopkar
@OmkarPh
Hi @pombredanne can you check this nexB/scancode-workbench#511
Philippe Ombredanne
@pombredanne
@OmkarPh yes! thank you ++
Omkar Phansopkar
@OmkarPh
Hi
What should I do exactly for the various Linux images in travis.yml
we have to keep different python versions or different Linux images
And exactly which versions for the chosen one
Omkar Phansopkar
@OmkarPh
@pombredanne ^^
Philippe Ombredanne
@pombredanne
@OmkarPh testing different Python was useless. We really want to test on different Linux images because that's what matters at run time. Python is only used for building :)
Omkar Phansopkar
@OmkarPh

@pombredanne ^^

Hi @pombredanne can you check this nexB/scancode-workbench#511

Omkar Phansopkar
@OmkarPh
Hi
i couldn't attend weekly meeting,
is there any feature that I can work on
Omkar Phansopkar
@OmkarPh
do we want to go ahead with this: nexB/scancode-workbench#446
Philippe Ombredanne
@pombredanne
@OmkarPh let me check tomorrow :P
I just did
yes for 446
Omkar Phansopkar
@OmkarPh
hi @pombredanne
Philippe Ombredanne
@pombredanne
@OmkarPh why do you think we need more issue templates? ... this should not be in the way? unless you can explain why?
Omkar Phansopkar
@OmkarPh
no no
i just want to know if that PR is still meaningful or not
if not then it can be closed
if yes, then I can select one of the latest available issue templates
also, since we already have an issue template, shouldn't this URL work fine: https://github.com/nexB/scancode-workbench/issues/new
Philippe Ombredanne
@pombredanne
yes :)
Omkar Phansopkar
@OmkarPh
Omkar Phansopkar
@OmkarPh
hi there
is there any feature in workbench for me to work on?
also, has aboutcode proposed any project regarding workbench for gsoc
Philippe Ombredanne
@pombredanne
@OmkarPh Yes! and yes.., let me put this out a bit later today :+1:
Omkar Phansopkar
@OmkarPh
Ok ;)