These are chat archives for akkadotnet/AkkaStreams

29th
Jun 2016
Marc Piechura
@marcpiechura
Jun 29 2016 14:02
@Danthar Do I need to update the text as well? looks like it's not equivalent to the latest from the jvm
Arjen Smits
@Danthar
Jun 29 2016 14:05
I skimmed it after i realised i was working off the wrong version. Dont think there are any large changes, else i'd would have spot them. But i could be wrong.
Marc Piechura
@marcpiechura
Jun 29 2016 14:07
strange, the docs from akka.io doesn't match the ones from the master branch :)
Arjen Smits
@Danthar
Jun 29 2016 14:07
how do you mean ?
Marc Piechura
@marcpiechura
Jun 29 2016 14:08
for example
website:
As a first motivating example, we will build a new Source that will simply emit numbers from 1 until it is cancelled. To start, we need to define the "interface" of our stage, which is called shape in Akka Streams terminology (this is explained in more detail in the section Modularity, Composition and Hierarchy).
branch:
As a first motivating example, we will build a new :class:Source that will simply emit numbers from 1 until it is
cancelled. To start, we need to define the "interface" of our stage, which is called shape in Akka Streams terminology
(this is explained in more detail in the section :ref:composition-scala). This is how this looks like:
the This is how this looks like: is missing
only a little example
Arjen Smits
@Danthar
Jun 29 2016 14:09
oh you mean the streams docs. you said akka.io so i was confused :P
Marc Piechura
@marcpiechura
Jun 29 2016 14:09
ahh lol
doc.akka.io :)
Arjen Smits
@Danthar
Jun 29 2016 14:11
ah yes, there could still be small changes. like i said, i skimmed it.
Arjen Smits
@Danthar
Jun 29 2016 14:12
i planned to revisit it fryday. Dont expect it to be a big issue that there are small textual differences. The core meaning of the text has not changed as far as i could tell.
oh
Marc Piechura
@marcpiechura
Jun 29 2016 14:13
for example the complete second code block is missing on the website
Arjen Smits
@Danthar
Jun 29 2016 14:13
yeah i noticed that early on when we started porting the docs
so i figured i was looking at the wrong source
or there is some other process that im unaware off.
maybe the master is simply not published yet ?
Marc Piechura
@marcpiechura
Jun 29 2016 14:14
the file hasn't changed since 25 of march :)
anyway I will try to work around it
Arjen Smits
@Danthar
Jun 29 2016 14:18
ok