test how different cluster sizes perform
and make it pluggable for people's apps
as for what you were saying @coffeeyesplease - I think the reason the recieving end is slower is because of how remote messages get delivered to their recipients
it's going to follow Netty's design much more closely than the current version
(Akka.Cluster will ship after Akka.NET 1.0 is released)
if it's a Helios issue then I know exactly where the problem is
it's the
LengthFrameDecoder
either it or the
ByteBuf sitting on top of it grabs only a partial chunk of a message
assumes the message is corrupt
and discards bytes until the buffer is empty
I'll take a look at that
I've had a spec written down on paper, quite literally - in my notebook, for Helios 2.0 and I'm desperate to work on it because I think it'll finally be easy to work directly with Helios once I've made those changes :p
Helios' current API is simple but not the most intuitive
had to rewrite our Murmur3 implementation in order to support it
(followed the Scala implementation - it wasn't so different from mine, just optimized for being able to construct a hash in discrete steps)
(rather than treating it like a black-box all-or-nothing operation)
@/all Unit2 for Akka.NET bootcamp is now available ;) https://github.com/petabridge/akka-bootcamp/tree/master/src/Unit-2
group routers don't manage their routees
however, for turning on a resizer with consistent hashing pools
let me see if I can find a config example for that - about to head out but I'm in the middle of updating all of the consistent hashing routers now
brought them up to code with JVM akka, includes fun stuff like virtual nodes
Once I get that done I may see if I have any Azure time left at work and try a stress test. My small Asus Ultra slim with an i5 is not the best for that sort of thing. Thanks again. I am will talk to you soon. Signing off here on the east coast.
One last thing I am blogging all about this experience so I may ping you with some research questions. Cheers and have a good one.
I'm seeing PR:s (like #689 and #691) with no explanation to why they are submitted. I think A PR should at least have a sentence or two explaining why the changes are being made and what the changes are, even if it's only white space changes. In the case of #689 several bugs were introduced. An explanation to why the changes were made could have saved me some time, instead I had to decipher what was done, and trying to figure out why it had been changed. Thoughts?