Where communities thrive


  • Join over 1.5M+ people
  • Join over 100K+ communities
  • Free without limits
  • Create your own community
People
Activity
  • 13:04
    atrauzzi edited #4229
  • 12:57
    atrauzzi commented #4229
  • 12:07
    imkow commented #4017
  • 06:43
    dependabot-preview[bot] labeled #4230
  • 06:43

    dependabot-preview[bot] on nuget

    Bump FsPickler from 5.3.1 to 5.… (compare)

  • 06:43
    dependabot-preview[bot] opened #4230
  • 05:38
    Aaronontheweb commented #4229
  • 05:38
    Aaronontheweb commented #4229
  • 03:29
    atrauzzi opened #4229
  • Feb 17 21:57
    Arkatufus edited #4228
  • Feb 17 21:46
    Arkatufus synchronize #4228
  • Feb 17 20:17
    Arkatufus synchronize #4228
  • Feb 17 19:55
    Arkatufus opened #4228
  • Feb 17 19:14
    Arkatufus synchronize #4226
  • Feb 17 18:28
    Aaronontheweb commented #4226
  • Feb 17 18:27
    Aaronontheweb commented #4226
  • Feb 17 18:23
    Aaronontheweb synchronize #4226
  • Feb 17 18:23

    Aaronontheweb on nuget

    (compare)

  • Feb 17 18:23

    Aaronontheweb on dev

    Bump Google.Protobuf from 3.11.… (compare)

  • Feb 17 18:23
    Aaronontheweb closed #4225
Daniel Söderberg
@raskolnikoov
@maxcherednik
Maxim Cherednik
@maxcherednik
Daniel Söderberg
@raskolnikoov
yes, I forgot to tell, my actor is a AtLeastOnceReciveActor (persistence)
maybe thats the problem in there
Maxim Cherednik
@maxcherednik
so ok. which part is not exactly working?
Daniel Söderberg
@raskolnikoov
I tell my actor and that actor starts another actor that does some magic and tells my actor the result. the result message is what I want to test
but it dosent get it in my TestKit void...
Maxim Cherednik
@maxcherednik
basically what you are testing is simple request response, hence the very first example from that blog should work...
another thing - when you actually hit the storage - it's not exactly a unit test
how about you replace all the storage actors and try it again ?
cause from what you describe - it should work
if you do everything else right, the only reason to fail is wrong persistence configuration
Daniel Söderberg
@raskolnikoov
no it dosent work.. :(
tried to do it with a simple A and B actor test... I called my A actor that calls B actor and returns to A actor... the return message to my A actor dosent every occur in my ExpectMsg
:/
I want to catch the Recive<MyMessage>
Maxim Cherednik
@maxcherednik
hm...
Daniel Söderberg
@raskolnikoov
im trying to test a actor that never returns a message
I just want to check that it gets a certain message
Maxim Cherednik
@maxcherednik
then there is something wrong in general
what about the very simple scenario ?
Daniel Söderberg
@raskolnikoov
that dosent work
Maxim Cherednik
@maxcherednik
like one actor - you send ping, it responds pong and you expect this pong on the test actor ?
Daniel Söderberg
@raskolnikoov
let me upload an example
how can I test this example with valid result :)
Maxim Cherednik
@maxcherednik
ok, like I thought it's not that simple then

so when you are here:

Receive<MessageFromB>(msg =>
{
//test if this happends in here!
});

you don't send it back to the original caller, right ?
Daniel Söderberg
@raskolnikoov
no that's the end
so I would like to check that this end occurs
Maxim Cherednik
@maxcherednik
in this case you can't test this
Daniel Söderberg
@raskolnikoov
daaaaaaaaam
:P
that's something you want tested :)
Maxim Cherednik
@maxcherednik
from the same article I sent
"How do I test a parent/child relationship?"
check it
actually it's not exactly this...
nevermind
I think you should test something else
give me a sec
Daniel Söderberg
@raskolnikoov
hehe and get a cup of coffee :)
brbr!
Daniel Söderberg
@raskolnikoov
back @maxcherednik
Maxim Cherednik
@maxcherednik
have a look at this guy
in there I have a similar situation
I've got this main actor: WidgetManagerActor