Where communities thrive


  • Join over 1.5M+ people
  • Join over 100K+ communities
  • Free without limits
  • Create your own community
People
Activity
  • Nov 16 16:14
    IgorFedchenko commented #4032
  • Nov 16 13:19
    ismaelhamed synchronize #4042
  • Nov 16 13:17
    ismaelhamed commented #3863
  • Nov 16 11:47
    IgorFedchenko synchronize #4032
  • Nov 16 11:47
    IgorFedchenko commented #4032
  • Nov 16 11:21
    ismaelhamed synchronize #3863
  • Nov 16 11:17
    ismaelhamed edited #3863
  • Nov 16 11:17
    ismaelhamed synchronize #4042
  • Nov 16 09:58
    IgorFedchenko synchronize #4032
  • Nov 16 09:49
    IgorFedchenko synchronize #4032
  • Nov 16 09:45
    IgorFedchenko commented #4032
  • Nov 16 09:17
    ismaelhamed opened #4043
  • Nov 16 09:03
    ismaelhamed opened #4042
  • Nov 16 09:03
    IgorFedchenko commented #4032
  • Nov 16 08:59
    IgorFedchenko synchronize #4032
  • Nov 16 08:57
    IgorFedchenko synchronize #4032
  • Nov 15 22:35
    Aaronontheweb commented #4032
  • Nov 15 20:26
    IgorFedchenko synchronize #4032
  • Nov 15 20:24
    IgorFedchenko commented #4032
  • Nov 15 20:06
    IgorFedchenko synchronize #4032
Maxim Cherednik
@maxcherednik

so when you are here:

Receive<MessageFromB>(msg =>
{
//test if this happends in here!
});

you don't send it back to the original caller, right ?
Daniel Söderberg
@raskolnikoov
no that's the end
so I would like to check that this end occurs
Maxim Cherednik
@maxcherednik
in this case you can't test this
Daniel Söderberg
@raskolnikoov
daaaaaaaaam
:P
that's something you want tested :)
Maxim Cherednik
@maxcherednik
from the same article I sent
"How do I test a parent/child relationship?"
check it
actually it's not exactly this...
nevermind
I think you should test something else
give me a sec
Daniel Söderberg
@raskolnikoov
hehe and get a cup of coffee :)
brbr!
Daniel Söderberg
@raskolnikoov
back @maxcherednik
Maxim Cherednik
@maxcherednik
have a look at this guy
in there I have a similar situation
I've got this main actor: WidgetManagerActor
and when it starts it sends a message to itself, which does some complicated logic of sending messages to someone else and having responses back
I am not sure if it's easy to comprehend
check this one for instance: WhenWidgetConfigurationProviderFailsShouldRetry
or this one: InitWidgetManagerActorWithSeveralWidgets
Maxim Cherednik
@maxcherednik
so the idea is that you send a message to the child actor and you should be prepared that it will never reply....
in this case you need to have backup logic of retry...
do you follow? :)
Daniel Söderberg
@raskolnikoov
yes I follow
Maxim Cherednik
@maxcherednik
for instance in my WidgetManagerActor I am injecting the actor, so it's not exactly a child.... but I need it this way.... in you case you can have a Props param from the constructor....
in the prod code - you set the real child actor's props, in the test code you have a props of the TestProbe
Daniel Söderberg
@raskolnikoov
yes.. but I will have to rewrite my test case for this. Thanks for the help! :)
Maxim Cherednik
@maxcherednik
you will probably need to rewrite lots of things :)
but anyhow... try it... other than this, I don't know how to handle this
Daniel Söderberg
@raskolnikoov
I talked to Roger Johansson about this now and he answered that it's not possible to do my test case.
Maxim Cherednik
@maxcherednik
yeah - like you described - not possible...
Aaron Stannard
@Aaronontheweb
@Rattenkrieg I haven't seen any examples of this being needed in practice
but with your changes to the MNTR in #2502
is it still possible to give one node amongst the others in the spec its own configuration?
I.E. if I wanted to run a test that gave one node a different configuration from the others?
I kind of think this is YAGNI to some extent, but still - that's a capability we had before that I would like to preserve in some capacity
in case you missed it, YAGNI
Aaron Stannard
@Aaronontheweb
ah nice
do you mention how to do that on the documentation PR you sent in|?
(haven't looked at it yet)
Sergey Prytkov
@Rattenkrieg
Nope, but this part isn't one that was affected by my changes
Aaron Stannard
@Aaronontheweb
cool, good to know