These are chat archives for andyet/SimpleWebRTC
I already have ghost users running, the only thing is on addvideo doesnt trigger...
You know what is the presence room concept?
you know, a simple "i dont know what i am talking about" or "I dont know if that property exists" would have been suitable.
Guess what? One year ago I started to mess with this framework, hopping to obtain a shiny presence channel and so on... ;)
Why re-invent the wheel ? I have listeners telling me when peers join.
IF they are enough for you, all is good! :+1:
So make something better ?, why troll around this place.
So, why you expect someone to think for you, instead to do your job?
anyways, i really dont have time to be having a conversation with some troll. I just feel bad for whom ever else comes here looking for advice.
good luck, and maybe try and find something better to do with your time then searching the internet for people to feel better than.
How many connections you need to connect to a peer, for video-conference? you have to connect to signaling server (1) to send audio and video (2) and to receive audio and video (2)
We talk on max numbers there, OK?
So, that's 217Mbps for upload. Same for download.
in my specific case i will have only audio streams and a limit of 30 ppl in a room, but still seems a large bandwidth will be consumed
You consider that the upload/download bandwidth of your peers would support 30 connections? And they have powerful enough computers to encode/decode 60 audio streams, every one?
So, every peer connect to media server, where they send audio and video, then it compute the final stream, and send this back. This way you have signaling + 2 up + 2 down (to encode/decode).
Feel different, right? ;)
Look, years ago, also myself I dreamed about WebRTC video-conference.
Because you cannot do it properly on high number of peers, with the current hardware. ;)