Where communities thrive


  • Join over 1.5M+ people
  • Join over 100K+ communities
  • Free without limits
  • Create your own community
People
Repo info
Activity
  • Jun 03 2019 12:11
    dotnet-maestro[bot] commented #1813
  • Jun 03 2019 12:11

    dotnet-maestro[bot] on darc-master-a926ae60-afdc-46d8-aabc-bb225655c15e

    (compare)

  • Jun 03 2019 12:11

    dotnet-maestro[bot] on master

    Update dependencies from https:… (compare)

  • Jun 03 2019 12:11
    dotnet-maestro[bot] closed #1813
  • Jun 03 2019 12:06
    dotnet-maestro[bot] opened #1813
  • Jun 03 2019 12:06

    dotnet-maestro[bot] on darc-master-a926ae60-afdc-46d8-aabc-bb225655c15e

    Update dependencies from https:… (compare)

  • Jun 03 2019 12:05

    dotnet-maestro[bot] on darc-master-a926ae60-afdc-46d8-aabc-bb225655c15e

    (compare)

  • May 30 2019 11:54
    jenergm commented #279
  • May 29 2019 14:59
    tmenier commented #1492
  • May 29 2019 04:58
    danroth27 updated the wiki
  • May 28 2019 14:25
    lewing commented #1807
  • May 27 2019 19:13
    matheusjulio96 commented #1652
  • May 27 2019 13:30
    springy76 commented #306
  • May 27 2019 13:13
    SQL-MisterMagoo commented #306
  • May 27 2019 13:07
    springy76 commented #306
  • May 27 2019 13:06
    springy76 commented #306
  • May 27 2019 12:24
    SQL-MisterMagoo commented #306
  • May 27 2019 12:20
    springy76 commented #306
  • May 27 2019 12:10
    dotnet-maestro[bot] commented #1812
  • May 27 2019 12:10

    dotnet-maestro[bot] on darc-master-e3474f54-f92f-4c3f-b116-ed9bdfe9754d

    (compare)

Alberto Passalacqua
@AlbertoPa
I only really need something that has taken care of the JS-dependent stuff, because I have no desire to rewrite those myself to make them work in blazor :P
Alberto Passalacqua
@AlbertoPa
@chucker23n:matrix.org same situation with all these libraries. Limited and buggy for months
Sören Nils Kuklau
@chucker23n:matrix.org
[m]
Ah yes, software development.
Alberto Passalacqua
@AlbertoPa
hehe
@chucker23n:matrix.org innovation! ;-)
Mario van Zeist
@MariovanZeist
That's why I made my own, at least they are my bugs now :)
Alberto Passalacqua
@AlbertoPa
well I don't have an interest in writing something to wrap Bootstrap
wvmstr
@wvmstr
MudBlazor here.
Alberto Passalacqua
@AlbertoPa
hmm is it just my perception, but many blazorians prefer material to bootstrap? :-?
AlbertoPa @AlbertoPa sees many known faces in the MudBlazor contrib list
AlbertoPa @AlbertoPa lures @MariovanZeist and @chucker23n:matrix.org with some home-made tiramisu (it was a boring Sunday)
MariovanZeist @MariovanZeist enjoys the 🥞, lovely
Alberto Passalacqua
@AlbertoPa
I keep seeing this error when using hosted blazor wasm:
fail: Microsoft.WebAssembly.Diagnostics.DevToolsProxy[0] DevToolsProxy::Run: Exception System.AggregateException: One or more errors occurred. (The remote party closed the WebSocket connection without completing the close handshake.)  ---> System.Net.WebSockets.WebSocketException (0x80004005): The remote party closed the WebSocket connection without completing the close handshake.    at System.Net.WebSockets.ManagedWebSocket.ThrowIfEOFUnexpected(Boolean throwOnPrematureClosure)    at System.Net.WebSockets.ManagedWebSocket.EnsureBufferContainsAsync(Int32 minimumRequiredBytes, CancellationToken cancellationToken, Boolean throwOnPrematureClosure)    at System.Runtime.CompilerServices.PoolingAsyncValueTaskMethodBuilder`1.StateMachineBox`1.System.Threading.Tasks.Sources.IValueTaskSource.GetResult(Int16 token)    at System.Net.WebSockets.ManagedWebSocket.ReceiveAsyncPrivate[TResult](Memory`1 payloadBuffer, CancellationToken cancellationToken)    at System.Runtime.CompilerServices.PoolingAsyncValueTaskMethodBuilder`1.StateMachineBox`1.System.Threading.Tasks.Sources.IValueTaskSource<TResult>.GetResult(Int16 token)    at System.Threading.Tasks.ValueTask`1.ValueTaskSourceAsTask.<>c.<.cctor>b__4_0(Object state) --- End of stack trace from previous location ---    at Microsoft.WebAssembly.Diagnostics.DevToolsProxy.ReadOne(WebSocket socket, CancellationToken token)    --- End of inner exception stack trace ---    at Microsoft.WebAssembly.Diagnostics.DevToolsProxy.Run(Uri browserUri, WebSocket ideSocket)
2 replies
why is it trying to find a websocket? :-?
Mario van Zeist
@MariovanZeist
Havn't used WASM in a while sorry
Alberto Passalacqua
@AlbertoPa
it seems just the devtools, but it is a little odd :-)
Mario van Zeist
@MariovanZeist
After the nice home-made tiramisu I am going to bed,
night
Alberto Passalacqua
@AlbertoPa
good night @MariovanZeist
SQL-MisterMagoo
@SQL-MisterMagoo
Hot Reload and Browser Link use websockets, I think.
Alberto Passalacqua
@AlbertoPa
oh I see
thanks @SQL-MisterMagoo
Stefan Ossendorf
@StefanOssendorf
Good morning blazor folks
Mario van Zeist
@MariovanZeist
Morning
Sören Nils Kuklau
@chucker23n:matrix.org
[m]
Hello
Alberto Passalacqua
@AlbertoPa
:eyes: morning... which means it's time I :sleeping:
Mario van Zeist
@MariovanZeist
Good night @AlbertoPa
Tobias Markus
@tobbi_gitlab
Aight people, launch party !!! :D
Peter Morris
@mrpmorris
The new(ish) record type makes Flux so simple :)
Peter Morris
@mrpmorris
and new()
SQL-MisterMagoo
@SQL-MisterMagoo
I saw a code fix earlier today create a record struct - is that different to a record or a struct separately? Anyone know when you would use record struct?
Haytam Zanid
@zHaytam
other than they are value types?
SQL-MisterMagoo
@SQL-MisterMagoo
I'm not sure of the difference between record and record struct I guess
Haytam Zanid
@zHaytam
record generates a class
record struct generates a struct
SQL-MisterMagoo
@SQL-MisterMagoo
Oh, you are saying record is reference type and record struct is value type
Haytam Zanid
@zHaytam
Yeah
SQL-MisterMagoo
@SQL-MisterMagoo
Are they just "fixing" records by adding a keyword - would you always use record struct normally
Haytam Zanid
@zHaytam
Well you wouldn't use "struct" all the time, so it's the same thing
You would use record most of the time, unless you need it to be a value type then you would use record struct (e.g. array performance)
SQL-MisterMagoo
@SQL-MisterMagoo
Right, but in terms of records, they are more suited to struct aren't they? Short lived, immutable etc?
Erwin Kuhn
@erwinkn
Records can be long-lived too, if you have immutable objects stored and passed around
But record structs are incredibly useful, I probably have dozens of them written by hand in my codebase atm
Haytam Zanid
@zHaytam

Right, but in terms of records, they are more suited to struct aren't they? Short lived, immutable etc?

Depends, I have some states that are records and long lived, so I use record

I also have some structs in my library that could be turned into record struct
So it all depends
SQL-MisterMagoo
@SQL-MisterMagoo
Sure, ok - all things can be long or short lived, just wondering what criteria would now point towards each implementation of record or record struct
Opinion is fine
Documentation is finer :)