Schubertrader (Ch: @BeamPrivacy)
👌 Get it better now (I am not a coder lol)
👌 Get it better now (I am not a coder lol)
Watamelon (Ch: @BeamPrivacy)
Perhaps, that would be a great addition to the Beam wallet
Perhaps, that would be a great addition to the Beam wallet
Vacholek (Ch: @BeamPrivacy)
I hope the upcoming DAO will solve such a problem in the future, if it arises. I think that if the price of Beam is high enough to result in a lack of new projects, by voting and changing the code it will be possible to remedy this (developers would have to comment on this). In the case of projects that cost a few pounds to create, the advantage is the ability to trace the blockchain, analyze the code and draw conclusions: scam or not scam. We all know here (at least I hope so) that we won't do things like that with Beam. Therefore, the higher price paid to create the project will, in my opinion, screen out hooligans and cheaters. I prefer privacy to be associated with a higher standard, and thus a correspondingly high price. If you're filthy rich, you care about your security and privacy. You pay a higher price than the common man. The same should be true for the privacy of cryptocurrencies. In this case, creating projects based on Beam etc. priv crypto.
I hope the upcoming DAO will solve such a problem in the future, if it arises. I think that if the price of Beam is high enough to result in a lack of new projects, by voting and changing the code it will be possible to remedy this (developers would have to comment on this). In the case of projects that cost a few pounds to create, the advantage is the ability to trace the blockchain, analyze the code and draw conclusions: scam or not scam. We all know here (at least I hope so) that we won't do things like that with Beam. Therefore, the higher price paid to create the project will, in my opinion, screen out hooligans and cheaters. I prefer privacy to be associated with a higher standard, and thus a correspondingly high price. If you're filthy rich, you care about your security and privacy. You pay a higher price than the common man. The same should be true for the privacy of cryptocurrencies. In this case, creating projects based on Beam etc. priv crypto.
Ashish Kumar(Ch: @BeamPrivacy)
Sir your token is dump sir many new project you told
Sir your token is dump sir many new project you told
Ashish Kumar(Ch: @BeamPrivacy)
But coin is dumping so fast
But coin is dumping so fast
John ☽onut (Ch: @BeamPrivacy)
I'm on the same page. The shouldn't be any massive paywall for building stuff on beam. Some projects might even need multiple tokens that interact so they would have to pay the fee multiple times. Or someone does a token swap for whatever reason and again has to pay. It's a barrier to adoption and independent developers will simply go to where it's affordable and easy to build on
I'm on the same page. The shouldn't be any massive paywall for building stuff on beam. Some projects might even need multiple tokens that interact so they would have to pay the fee multiple times. Or someone does a token swap for whatever reason and again has to pay. It's a barrier to adoption and independent developers will simply go to where it's affordable and easy to build on
Laser Beam Scatman(Ch: @BeamPrivacy)
Yeah a barrier won’t necessarily avoid scams. Audits do. Can’t wait to 🥩.
Yeah a barrier won’t necessarily avoid scams. Audits do. Can’t wait to 🥩.
Watamelon (Ch: @BeamPrivacy)
It's already quite expensive for the average developer
It's already quite expensive for the average developer
Watamelon (Ch: @BeamPrivacy)
That would impact decentralization unfortunately
That would impact decentralization unfortunately
Watamelon (Ch: @BeamPrivacy)
The biggest cost of decentralization is that people have to think for themselves
The biggest cost of decentralization is that people have to think for themselves
Watamelon (Ch: @BeamPrivacy)
You don't have any omnipotent God to tell you what you can use and what you can't use or what can be there and can't be there
You don't have any omnipotent God to tell you what you can use and what you can't use or what can be there and can't be there
Watamelon (Ch: @BeamPrivacy)
Even if it is a barrier to entry it's a really great thing
Even if it is a barrier to entry it's a really great thing
Watamelon (Ch: @BeamPrivacy)
I'm hoping there's no similar lock up to launch dapps
I'm hoping there's no similar lock up to launch dapps
Watamelon (Ch: @BeamPrivacy)
That being said though
The lockup does cause there to be a limited amount of potential confidential assets on the chain ever
Watamelon (Ch: @BeamPrivacy)
The biggest reason that I'd support this is because it incentivizes people to do something akin to ERC20 tokens
The biggest reason that I'd support this is because it incentivizes people to do something akin to ERC20 tokens
Watamelon (Ch: @BeamPrivacy)
I mean the cell on any good privacy coin is that you don't have to worry about staying private there isn't a million steps to do
I mean the cell on any good privacy coin is that you don't have to worry about staying private there isn't a million steps to do
message group (Ch: @BeamPrivacy)
Those who need SMS marketing can contact me and support any country in the world
Those who need SMS marketing can contact me and support any country in the world
message group (Ch: @BeamPrivacy)
Those who need SMS marketing can contact me and support any country in the world
Those who need SMS marketing can contact me and support any country in the world
message group (Ch: @BeamPrivacy)
Those who need SMS marketing can contact me and support any country in the world
Those who need SMS marketing can contact me and support any country in the world
Watamelon (Ch: @BeamPrivacy)
I mean they'll come anyway
I mean they'll come anyway
David (Ch: @BeamPrivacy)
But at least they will reduce the circulatung supply
But at least they will reduce the circulatung supply
Watamelon (Ch: @BeamPrivacy)
I've seen individual people in here go ahead and promote the idea of a mascot coin on this chain anyway
I've seen individual people in here go ahead and promote the idea of a mascot coin on this chain anyway
David (Ch: @BeamPrivacy)
A dead shitcoin will at least burn the 3000 beam
A dead shitcoin will at least burn the 3000 beam
Laser Beam Scatman(Ch: @BeamPrivacy)
I get it 😁
I get it 😁
David (Ch: @BeamPrivacy)
I suppose with crypto startup costs can be zero
I suppose with crypto startup costs can be zero
David (Ch: @BeamPrivacy)
But all other new ventures usally require starting capital
But all other new ventures usally require starting capital
Vacholek (Ch: @BeamPrivacy)
In fact, also right. But do we want Beam, and thus privacy, to be associated with shitcoins?
In fact, also right. But do we want Beam, and thus privacy, to be associated with shitcoins?
Laser Beam Scatman(Ch: @BeamPrivacy)
We want to separate the wheat from the chaff right ? 😎
We want to separate the wheat from the chaff right ? 😎