hi @alberskib! looks like things are quite busy on our side as well ") we were working hard on pointless, tabula and scarph, but on the way we got new ideas and have new plans on improving things. quoting yourself
just a little more patience
so don't worry, take your time :wink:
0.5.0-SNAPSHOTis on cosas already. Maybe I should release that version, it worked I think. I’m just working already on ohnosequences/scarph#22 and forgot about that version..
@alberskib I was thinking that it'd be a good idea if you could take a look at the current state of both https://github.com/bio4j/angulillos and https://github.com/bio4j/angulillos-titan, and ask me if there's something that you don't understand there. Overall the library is pretty straightforward if you factor out the java generics noise :)
I think it should be pretty straightforward to implement bio4j/angulillos-dynamodb, and it would let us experiment with DynamoDB as a backend with real big data. The scarph stuff is really nice but I honestly cannot give you an estimate of when it will be ready; so I want to keep things going regarding DynamoDB and your project.
TypedVertexin order to provide specific versions for DynamoDb backend or just implement some kind of
DynamoDbRawEdge. I am not sure: I think that yes I need to, but when I look into titan or neo4j implementation of angulillos there is no such files.
TypedVertexis just for identifying used backend and offer possibility to communicate graphs from different backends?
XXXTypeclasses should be completely decoupled from any resource management, auth etc.