I would be happy to read a proposal for a simpler interface, however I would ask that you read that discussion first.
ah, I think there's a typo in at this page
using the
BASE directive
should not be:
using the
FROM directive
If you have any suggestions for the website, we welcome those too.
A PR ekcetera ..., everything is up for discussion.
I hope this standard will be developed by the community rather than only by me and @pbelmann.
a bigger font would be more confortable
btw, are you coming to Docker symposium at King's College, aren't you ?
I would like to meet everyone in the bioinformatics community who has been experimenting with Docker too.
I’ll start a rebuild on the CI server - https://circleci.com/gh/bioboxes/validator-short-read-assembler/110
It looks like there some lxc-start problems on circleci
I’ll clear the cache and rebuild, I think the previous build of velvet with the old file validator is included.
so it was the cache?
Yes
Because Docker thinks that the images are identical because the Dockerfiles are the same.
Therefore it uses the existing image without rebuilding.
This may or may not be an issue in future.
We can keep it in mind, I don’t think we need to do anything about it now.
I noticed it when I was working on the new binning spec
the new file-validator problem is that the check_mounted_files method
https://github.com/bioboxes/file-validator/blob/master/validate_biobox_file/main.py#L46-L52
does not work with fasta types when the values are not defined in a list:
version: 0.9.0
arguments:
- fasta:
id: "id"
type: "type"
value: "value"And I need this for binning.
Because it iterates over a list