will be nice to have someone from the original team on board
Ashley Mannix
@KodrAus
Definitely. I've opened a PR with the code of conduct: bitflags/bitflags#160
Dylan DPC
@Dylan-DPC
yep
do we have bors set up?
Ashley Mannix
@KodrAus
Not yet
Dylan DPC
@Dylan-DPC
ok
Ashley Mannix
@KodrAus
Looks like bors is being picky
Ashley Mannix
@KodrAus
Oh it must've been the configuration missing that was making bors timeout?
Dylan DPC
@Dylan-DPC
@KodrAus i guess i mentioned appveyor by mistake in the config which was the reason it was timing out xD
Ashley Mannix
@KodrAus
Ahh ok. I think we're fine without AppVeyor for bitflags anyways. Saves having to come up with an account for it
Dylan DPC
@Dylan-DPC
yah. I just copied the config from uuid
Ashley Mannix
@KodrAus
I'll work on a CONTRIBUTING.md this week similar to what we came up with for uuid. I think it's pretty much business-as-usual for bitflags now that we're all set up
Oh I'll do a point release with our new repository links
We'll need to wait until July before we can add the bitflags/owners team as owners on crates.io, but dtolnay and I can push releases in the meantime
Dylan DPC
@Dylan-DPC
@KodrAus can you settle the tie on #163? :P
Ashley Mannix
@KodrAus
@Dylan-DPC would the experience be that we have a feature request template to pick and the link at the bottom to open an issue without a template?
Dylan DPC
@Dylan-DPC
yep
just like UUID is now
Andreas Liljeqvist
@bonega
I can't see any examples of it, but the expanded macro implies that I should be able to do flags.FLAGX() instead of flags.contains(Flags::FLAGX). Is that right?