Where communities thrive


  • Join over 1.5M+ people
  • Join over 100K+ communities
  • Free without limits
  • Create your own community
People
Activity
  • May 05 2021 08:08
    coveralls commented #205
  • May 05 2021 08:08
    coveralls commented #205
  • May 05 2021 08:07
    coveralls commented #205
  • May 05 2021 08:07
    coveralls commented #205
  • May 05 2021 08:04
    sonarcloud[bot] commented #205
  • May 05 2021 08:04
    sonarcloud[bot] commented #205
  • May 05 2021 08:03
    jaytaph synchronize #205
  • May 05 2021 08:03

    jaytaph on symlink

    moved ed25519->x25519 to outsid… (compare)

  • May 05 2021 06:00
    jaytaph commented #197
  • May 05 2021 06:00
    jaytaph commented #197
  • May 05 2021 06:00
    jaytaph commented #197
  • May 05 2021 06:00
    jaytaph commented #197
  • May 04 2021 14:43
    jaytaph commented #197
  • May 04 2021 10:59
    coveralls commented #205
  • May 04 2021 10:59
    coveralls commented #205
  • May 04 2021 10:59
    coveralls commented #205
  • May 04 2021 10:58
    coveralls commented #205
  • May 04 2021 10:56
    coveralls commented #205
  • May 04 2021 10:56
    coveralls commented #205
  • May 04 2021 10:56
    coveralls commented #205
acalatrava
@acalatrava
You are thinking that because the address has a @ in it it should belong to an organization. But what I’m telling is that the @ means nothing, only visually it could belongs to an org, but in reality anyone could create that address. Only the address that cryptographically are signed are the ones that belongs to the org
Joshua Thijssen
@jaytaph
yes.. but we check that when a user adds their account to the key-resolver?
we don't need to check it every time?
acalatrava
@acalatrava
Is not needed to check it on the key resolver? We just Store it
The client will verify when receive an email from that account
And will add a flag to the email telling that the email comes from an organization (and the organization name)
Joshua Thijssen
@jaytaph
i'm not 100% sure how that would work
acalatrava
@acalatrava
Ok I’ll try to explain it better in a document
Joshua Thijssen
@jaytaph
:-)
acalatrava
@acalatrava
I’m not sure if I could do it today though
More IKEA furniture 😅
Joshua Thijssen
@jaytaph
no rush.. i'm not 100% sure what you mean.. but i need to setup some other things as well.. maybe think about a bit on reading messages...
acalatrava
@acalatrava
By the way, when you fetch messages are they stored on the vault? Or the vault only contains the keys and addresses?
Joshua Thijssen
@jaytaph
only keys and addresses... i don't actually fetch messages yet... that will come later i guess
send you a new message...
acalatrava
@acalatrava
Oh ok, that’s what I though
However we need to develop a nice client with UI soon
I could create something with flutter for Android/iOS
Joshua Thijssen
@jaytaph
yes.. i've started with some electron stuff... but this is not really my cup of tea...
acalatrava
@acalatrava
Yes, I cloned the repo thinking that it was working
It looked nice though
I only made a couple of (very simple) projects on flutter but I guess I could create something at least to make it usable on the move
Joshua Thijssen
@jaytaph
my goal for now is to make sure the infra is running properly.. make sure mail is being sent and received, organisations and accounts are created and managed... quite possibly webhook handlers implementations.. if that all works, we have at least a system that is usable..
there are lots of issues I want to solve... like the fact everything relies on a single private key is ok.. but probably not what you would like
acalatrava
@acalatrava
You are right, we need to have the Infra working and we need to do some changes to crypto too. I’ll try to put everything on a doc today or tomorrow
acalatrava
@acalatrava
Can I create pages at the wiki?
Joshua Thijssen
@jaytaph
Not sure
Can give you access
i think you have now access
acalatrava
@acalatrava
I just saw the invitation. Nice! I’ll create a “proposal #2” document trying to explain everything
Joshua Thijssen
@jaytaph
:thumbsup:
Joshua Thijssen
@jaytaph
morning!
acalatrava
@acalatrava
morning!
I've been thinking all night about organizations and it's not easy........
I'll write the doc now
Joshua Thijssen
@jaytaph
:-)
Joshua Thijssen
@jaytaph
ok.. i've read the proposal
i think there is not a lot of differences... but i really want to try to make the domain part not public info..
acalatrava
@acalatrava
yep... that's the main problem
but as much as I think about it I don't find a solution
Joshua Thijssen
@jaytaph
there are a few actors who need to know / verify domain info:
  • sender of an email (does it?)
  • key-server when an address (with or without organisation part) is added/modified
and the recipient of a message
acalatrava
@acalatrava
if the information is not public there is no way to verify the organisation
I mean, I could be the first to register apple.com
and that way there would be a black market? to sell the "domain" to apple...
Joshua Thijssen
@jaytaph
isn't this the same as with twitter?
what keeps somebody from registering: @apple ?
acalatrava
@acalatrava
yes... I guess