@Kimundi yeah, extern crate foo = "foo-rs" is a little unfortunate... :(
I like foo-rs for the project name, but once you are inside the universe of rustc, having rs anywhere in a name doesn't make sense
I just realized that prototype-3 has one important ability lacking - to ensure that all the program parameters are provided. Now the question is whether I should finish prototype-3 first, merge, and then continue to p-4.
p-3 should be mostly forward-compatible (from the user standpoint), so I guess that should be fine
So we are good with gfx-rs? I think I am good with it.
emberian @cmr is good with it
@kvark what is the end goal of Surface stuff? FBO/render target support?