Where communities thrive


  • Join over 1.5M+ people
  • Join over 100K+ communities
  • Free without limits
  • Create your own community
People
Repo info
Activity
  • 14:14
    krolli edited #3131
  • 14:14
    krolli edited #3131
  • 14:14
    krolli edited #3131
  • 11:36
    krolli opened #3131
  • Jan 21 15:46
    SimonWoodburyForget closed #3129
  • Jan 21 15:46
    SimonWoodburyForget commented #3129
  • Jan 20 19:58
    parasyte edited #3128
  • Jan 20 15:05
    kvark commented #3128
  • Jan 20 14:40
    kvark labeled #3130
  • Jan 20 14:40
    kvark labeled #3130
  • Jan 20 14:40
    kvark labeled #3130
  • Jan 20 14:40
    kvark labeled #3130
  • Jan 20 14:40
    kvark labeled #3130
  • Jan 20 14:40
    kvark opened #3130
  • Jan 20 10:13
    pluth commented #3128
  • Jan 20 09:59
    pluth commented #3128
  • Jan 20 09:59
    pluth commented #3128
  • Jan 20 09:52
    pluth commented #3128
  • Jan 20 07:41
    krogovin commented #2960
  • Jan 19 22:24
    kvark commented #3129
Dzmitry Malyshau
@kvark
indeed :dart:
Marvin Löbel
@Kimundi
Yeah, I'm not sure how the -rs should be handled in general
Brendan Zabarauskas
@brendanzab
-rs is good for bindings
and wrappers to existing APIs/libs
where as gfx is a level above
Dzmitry Malyshau
@kvark
I just kinda got used to it. Not minding any name as long as it says something and is used consistently
Corey Richardson
@cmr
I like -rs for project names.
Marvin Löbel
@Kimundi
Me too, but there needs to be a convention about how the library should be called
cause extern crate gfx-rs doesn't work, and making extern crate foo = "foo-rs" the convention seems bad :)
Dzmitry Malyshau
@kvark
We need to migrate to the org chat room...
Brendan Zabarauskas
@brendanzab
@Kimundi yeah, extern crate foo = "foo-rs" is a little unfortunate... :(
Corey Richardson
@cmr
I like foo-rs for the project name, but once you are inside the universe of rustc, having rs anywhere in a name doesn't make sense
Brendan Zabarauskas
@brendanzab
yep
Dzmitry Malyshau
@kvark
I just realized that prototype-3 has one important ability lacking - to ensure that all the program parameters are provided. Now the question is whether I should finish prototype-3 first, merge, and then continue to p-4.
p-3 should be mostly forward-compatible (from the user standpoint), so I guess that should be fine
anyway, bbl
Brendan Zabarauskas
@brendanzab
So we are good with gfx-rs? I think I am good with it.
cmr @cmr is good with it
Corey Richardson
@cmr
@kvark what is the end goal of Surface stuff? FBO/render target support?
Corey Richardson
@cmr
Ya'll should join https://gitter.im/gfx-rs, @Kimundi @csherratt @ozkriff @photex @mitchmindtree etc
Marvin Löbel
@Kimundi
@cmr: I get stuff about needing to authorize access to private repos with that
Corey Richardson
@cmr
Hm..
Marvin Löbel
@Kimundi
yes
Corey Richardson
@cmr
I wonder if that is because it is an organization chat...
Marvin Löbel
@Kimundi
That works