Where communities thrive


  • Join over 1.5M+ people
  • Join over 100K+ communities
  • Free without limits
  • Create your own community
People
Repo info
Activity
  • Aug 22 2018 14:10
    briancavalier commented #181
  • Aug 22 2018 14:03
    joshburgess commented #181
  • Aug 09 2018 11:26
    briancavalier commented #181
  • Aug 07 2018 19:43
    joshburgess opened #181
  • May 29 2018 11:36
    briancavalier edited #179
  • May 29 2018 11:36
    briancavalier edited #179
  • May 29 2018 11:36
    briancavalier commented #178
  • May 29 2018 11:36
    coveralls commented #180
  • May 29 2018 11:36
    coveralls commented #180
  • May 29 2018 11:36
    coveralls commented #180
  • May 29 2018 11:34
    briancavalier opened #180
  • May 29 2018 11:32

    briancavalier on reorg-api-docs-es-aplus

    Move then and resolve to intero… (compare)

  • May 11 2018 01:01
    briancavalier commented #178
  • May 11 2018 01:00
    briancavalier edited #179
  • May 11 2018 01:00
    briancavalier opened #179
  • May 11 2018 00:40
    briancavalier commented #178
  • May 10 2018 03:31
    dmitriz commented #178
  • May 09 2018 05:08
    dmitriz commented #178
  • May 09 2018 05:01
    dmitriz commented #178
  • May 09 2018 05:00
    dmitriz commented #178
David Chase
@davidchase
i think its gzip as well im looking at the network panel from cdnjs
Brian Cavalier
@briancavalier
ok
yeah, I can’t imagine it was 2.4k min-only and ballooned 10x to 20k min-only
David Chase
@davidchase
yeah i think it was an old version
David Chase
@davidchase
:clap: thats awesome
Bergi
@bergus
Regarding greenkeeper: as there are no pull requests open, wouldn't that mean that there should not be any greenkeeper-xy branches either? At least that's how I understood greenkeeperio/greenkeeper#120. I don't think you need to delete them manually. Can you investigate that? Maybe its a workflow thing, a bug, or just a config issue.
Brian Cavalier
@briancavalier
Yeah, I dunno … there shouldn’t be any greenkeeper config needed to get the default behavior. Seems like probably a bug
Bergi
@bergus
Did you report it already? Should I do (I don't know much about what you did to enable GK)?
Brian Cavalier
@briancavalier
Not yet, but will do it tonight, when I get back to my laptop
Bergi
@bergus
:+1:
Brian Cavalier
@briancavalier
It looks like we may have to change creed’s travis config
greenkeeperio/greenkeeper#221
but it’s still not totally clear to me if that’s what’s going on
but looking at the OP’s PR to his own project, it certainly looks like we could just do the same thing: BenoitAverty/reactive-goban@ec61edb
we’d need to delete the existing defunct greenkeeper branches, but future branches should get deleted
seem right to you guys?
if so, we can just try that first, and if it doesn’t work, then maybe open a new GK issue
Brian Cavalier
@briancavalier
this issue supports the theory as well: greenkeeperio/greenkeeper#217
Pradeep Daniel
@contrasam
Hi, @briancavalier was just trying out creed, I get ".bimap is not a function" when mapping to Sanctuary Either type
Brian Cavalier
@briancavalier
Hi @contrasam. The currently published version is slightly behind master. So bimap hasn't been published yet, sorry about confusion there
It's on my todo list to release an update soon.
I'd be interested to see your use case though, since I've been wondering how folks might use bimap
Pradeep Daniel
@contrasam
@briancavalier oh ok got it! I am just playing with creed rite now, I was trying to use bimap to convert to Either type, don't know if it should be used for it but I tried to use it like promise.bimap(S.Left,S.Right) [S from sanctuary]
Pradeep Daniel
@contrasam
@briancavalier not a actual use case :-P but just an experiment
Brian Cavalier
@briancavalier
cool
the thing about bimap is that it doesn't change the state ... iow, bimapping a rejected promise produces another rejected promise, just with a mapped rejection reason. Just want to make sure that's what you intended
so, with promise.bimap(S.Left, S.Right), you'll end up with a promise that is either: 1) fulfilled with a Right, or 2) rejected with a Left
if, instead, you wanted a promise that is fulfilled with a Right or Left, you could use then: promise.then(S.Right, S.Left) (note the order)
Pradeep Daniel
@contrasam
Yes I was trying to use it like the .then example, reject().bimap(S.Left,S.Right).then((E) => E.isLeft)......now I got it! its clear thanks!
Brian Cavalier
@briancavalier
happy to help :)
and creed 1.1.0 just landed, with bimap: https://github.com/briancavalier/creed/releases/tag/1.1.0
Pradeep Daniel
@contrasam
Woah! :-) :+1: