DoneJS contributor meeting: https://plus.google.com/u/0/b/117481170193954630503/events/cnohk9cn8nkskh9gfk0te3821hk
Hi all. What's the best way to update a template bound to a viewModel that has a can.Model? I'd like the template to update after a model is created/saved/removed?
one property on the viewmodel for the promise returned by the model
and another for the data the promise returns
obviously it gets more complex than that when you have multiple operations happening on your Model
Okay, I'm doing something similar, but I'm doing the findAll. Do I have to call a method to update the template after calling
.save?
The template updates after calling object.destroy() but not after object.save().
Watching the network logs, the object is indeed updated, but there isn't a call to the findAll url after update.
you should just get the updated data back in the response to the save() call
is your
save() creating a new item or updating an item?
In one case, a new item is created, edited, and then
save() is called on that new item.
In another case, an existing item is edited, then
save() is called on it.
No, it looks like the deferred returned resolves to the object that was edited.
you can listen to events on the Model and use them to update your viewModel
I’m not sure if that’s the best way to do it though
someone else might have a better idea
If it helps, I made a simplified gist: https://gist.github.com/roemhildtg/f597e1987f78e48e79f3 there's a form part of it that calls the formSubmit.
I noticed the example you provided, you used
value in the gamePromise, I'm using get does that make a difference?
value doesn't work since for me, since the model is getting passed in by the component.
get sets up a binding
so if you used
get it should return a new promise if your filter or group or objectModel changes
but you’ll have to handle it in each place you’re calling save
so it’s not a perfect solution
I’m sure someone has a better idea
Okay, I'll keep that approach in mind, I'll have to replace the existing object in the list when its edited probably too I think. Thanks for the assistance
I haven’t used it extensively, but I think it might handle a lot of the data synchronization for you
Do you know will can-connect/super-map eventually replace can.Model?
would be a good question for the forums though
there’s been some discusson on the 3.x roadmap: http://forums.donejs.com/t/canjs-roadmap-discussion/75
I think I might have been going at this with the wrong approach, but I'd love a second opinion. Initially I thought it would be good to pass an extended can.Model into my component, and trigger all the query/edit/etc through the table component, but it may be better and more generic to do the query within the parent app and pass the can.Model.List into the table component.