Where communities thrive


  • Join over 1.5M+ people
  • Join over 100K+ communities
  • Free without limits
  • Create your own community
People
Repo info
Activity
  • Dec 04 22:03
    chasenlehara opened #5440
  • Dec 04 22:03
    chasenlehara labeled #5440
  • Dec 04 19:18
    cherifGsoul review_requested #5432
  • Dec 04 14:09
    m-ahmadi starred canjs/canjs
  • Dec 04 10:52
    ansyeow starred canjs/canjs
  • Dec 03 14:53
    matthewp commented #5439
  • Dec 03 14:30
    frank-dspeed opened #5439
  • Dec 02 18:13
    greenkeeper[bot] commented #5392
  • Dec 02 18:13

    greenkeeper[bot] on core-js-3.4.7

    chore(package): update core-js … (compare)

  • Dec 02 17:48
    greenkeeper[bot] commented #5392
  • Dec 02 17:48

    greenkeeper[bot] on core-js-3.4.6

    chore(package): update core-js … (compare)

  • Dec 02 15:38
    phillipskevin commented #5438
  • Dec 02 15:38
    phillipskevin closed #5438
  • Dec 02 15:38
    phillipskevin commented #5438
  • Dec 01 23:28
    justinbmeyer commented #5438
  • Dec 01 23:06
    justinbmeyer commented #5438
  • Dec 01 23:06
    justinbmeyer commented #5438
  • Dec 01 23:04
    justinbmeyer edited #5438
  • Dec 01 23:03
    justinbmeyer opened #5438
  • Nov 29 15:01
    cherifGsoul synchronize #5432
Chris Gomez
@akagomez
@gsmeets That is odd. I found this in component.js, but no calls to .off(): https://github.com/bitovi/canjs/blob/master/component/component.js#L272-L277
Guido Smeets
@gsmeets
hmm, the bug is actually a bit more subtle than I expected
it has to do with block statements being a direct child of a component
I'll see if I can create a simple testcase and I'll create a github issue
Chris Gomez
@akagomez
Groovy. Thanks!
Paul Tichonczuk
@tracer99
Created pull request to fix FF debugging function stupid bitovi/canjs#1877
@matthewp you were 100% correct on the lack of use of hasOwnProperty adding that in three places was the only fix
Guido Smeets
@gsmeets
@akagomez the issue seems to be worse than I thought, in canjs 2.2.7 no component's destroy method is called when removed from the DOM. in 2.2.6 it works fine
Chris Gomez
@akagomez
Eek!
Do you have a test written? If you do, submit a PR and we can bisect the issue.
Thanks for digging into that.
Guido Smeets
@gsmeets
I'll write a test this evening (CEST+1)
Guido Smeets
@gsmeets
I've also found the root cause now
bitovi/canjs@e9450fa
Chris Gomez
@akagomez
Beautiful! That will help.
Guido Smeets
@gsmeets
The solution is a one-liner :), I'll create a PR
Chris Gomez
@akagomez
@gsmeets Cool! Link it here when you do.
Matthew Phillips
@matthewp
@tracer99 will that work with inherited properties?
Terry
@tmcdonnell87
Hi - I'm wondering if can.js models can be used in a node.js environment. (I haven't found anything solid online either way.) We'd like to do some server-side orchestration - think collecting order data from various different services - and it would be great to re-use code. However, it doesn't seem to be as straightforward as I hoped, as steal is throwing some errors trying to pull in can. Is there an example somewhere in the docs, or is this a bad idea in general?
Chris Gomez
@akagomez
@tmcdonnell87 We recently started a project for dealing with this exact scenario. Check it out: http://donejs.com/
One of the beautiful aspects of the DoneJS project is that you can re-use ALL of your code on client and server (templates, components, models, etc)
@justinbmeyer @daffl and @matthewp can speak more to it if you have specific questions.
Terry
@tmcdonnell87
sweet, I'll take a look
It doesn't seem that done has been updated in a couple years - is it actively maintained?
Chris Gomez
@akagomez
@tmcdonnell87 Are you referring to the repo?
I don’t think that’s the codebase that backs http://donejs.com
I should had been clear, DoneJS is currently in an alpha/beta state.
(not sure which unfortunately)
To that point it’s primarly made up of CanJS/StealJS/DocumentJS and all of those are actively maintained.
Terry
@tmcdonnell87
ah, found the repo from npm
David Luecke
@daffl
@tmcdonnell87 The repository is at https://github.com/donejs/donejs. Working on cleaning that up a little. If you are only looking for server side rendering you also might want to have a look at the CanJS minor branch and https://github.com/canjs/can-ssr
Terry
@tmcdonnell87
we'd want both. we currently have a can.js project that's a pure-client webapp, and we're looking to add some server-side orchestration. When you say donejs is in alpha/beta, which parts are you talking about? (Canjs, steal, etc. are all released)
David Luecke
@daffl
DoneJS is the combination of CanJS + Steal + DocumentJS + FuncUnit and some other glue projects. CanJS 2.3 - which adds support for server-side rendering - is due around the end of the month. There are alpha releases for DoneJS and beta for can-ssr
Paul Tichonczuk
@tracer99
@matthewp I'm not clear on the question. In what circumstance would we care about a map inheriting? The event one might be an issue however.
avg6003
@avg6003
Can anyone tell me what is the use of ' ! ' in defining the routes?
Chris Gomez
@akagomez
Where is it documented that you should use “!” to define routes?
avg6003
@avg6003
i am reading from here http://canjs.com/guides/Routing.html
It says to define a route I have to use '#!' in begining of the rout
what is the reason to use '!' ?
I tried without using !
its working but it automatically takes !
when i press back button then it first adds ! and then I press again the back button then it goes to previous route
Chris Gomez
@akagomez
Ah! I see. I can’t say. I’ve only worked with pushstate routing.
avg6003
@avg6003
do you know any source where I can find the reason?
Chris Gomez
@akagomez
avg6003
@avg6003
thanx
let me check
avg6003
@avg6003
I didnt found any information about my question!!
Guido Smeets
@gsmeets
@akagomez a bit later than I wanted to, but here is that fix for the component's destroy method: bitovi/canjs#1886