then try making a change to the data in the fixture
you'll notice it console.logs the cached data only
if you run a 3rd time you'll see the updates
@RALifeCoach if you'd like to check if bubbling is getting setup, you can put a debugger here: https://github.com/canjs/canjs/blob/master/map/bubble.js#L42
if that gets hit, something is setting up bubbling
the problem is that on initial display the controls are loaded and then updated on all 156 rows
@justinbmeyer are you still here?
Thank you :)
:)
instead of creating a can.Map instance and passing that
I was late for my car even
sorry for not letting you know
anyway, I'm going to have to start the training now. I will hopefully be available after 7 PM CST, but I might go to dinner
and then talk to my wife / baby
and hopefully after that be available
@justinbmeyer I do appreciate your help. Now that I know, I will make plans to work on other tasks. When you are free, please fill in the details to your “don’t need a Map” statement. I will check tonight or tomorrow for details. Enjoy your time eating, and spending time with your wife and baby.
he means use plain javascript objects
@phillipskevin wrote, "@phillipskevin
He might just mean to pass the raw data to your template
instead of creating a can.Map instance and passing that” notice the word ‘might’ and I asked how would I pass the data, would I use attributes when creating the fragment to add to my document?
He might just mean to pass the raw data to your template
instead of creating a can.Map instance and passing that” notice the word ‘might’ and I asked how would I pass the data, would I use attributes when creating the fragment to add to my document?
just like this:
var template = can.stache('<player-row id="player-row-{{pid}}" {pid}="pid" {parent}="parent"></player-row>');
var fragment = template({
pid: this.pid,
parent: this
});
so, in the code above, it is just a plain object being passed to the renderer
If what you want to do is take data you receive from a server and pass it to a template, you can just do it without creating can.Maps
by passing the raw data to your stache renderer function
I don’t know for sure if that is what Justin is proposing