Where communities thrive


  • Join over 1.5M+ people
  • Join over 100K+ communities
  • Free without limits
  • Create your own community
People
Repo info
Activity
  • Oct 14 21:13
    greenkeeper[bot] labeled #5378
  • Oct 14 21:12
    greenkeeper[bot] opened #5378
  • Oct 14 21:12

    greenkeeper[bot] on can-simple-map-4.3.3

    fix(package): update can-simple… (compare)

  • Oct 14 20:19
    greenkeeper[bot] labeled #5377
  • Oct 14 20:19
    greenkeeper[bot] opened #5377
  • Oct 14 20:19

    greenkeeper[bot] on @feathersjs

    chore(package): update @feather… (compare)

  • Oct 14 20:18
    greenkeeper[bot] labeled #5376
  • Oct 14 20:18
    greenkeeper[bot] opened #5376
  • Oct 14 20:18

    greenkeeper[bot] on @feathersjs

    chore(package): update @feather… (compare)

  • Oct 14 14:43
    greenkeeper[bot] closed #5373
  • Oct 14 14:43

    greenkeeper[bot] on can-deep-observable-1.0.1

    (compare)

  • Oct 14 14:42

    m-mujica on update-deep-observable

    (compare)

  • Oct 14 14:42

    m-mujica on master

    Update can-deep-observable to l… Merge pull request #5374 from c… (compare)

  • Oct 14 14:42
    m-mujica closed #5374
  • Oct 14 14:42
    m-mujica closed #5365
  • Oct 14 14:09
    f-ricci starred canjs/canjs
  • Oct 14 13:55
    greenkeeper[bot] commented #5375
  • Oct 14 13:55

    greenkeeper[bot] on core-js-3.3.2

    chore(package): update core-js … (compare)

  • Oct 14 10:51
    m-mujica review_requested #5374
  • Oct 14 07:43
    rjgotten commented #5358
Nico R.
@nriesco
I’m worried because when dealing with lists of complex objects it would get slow when dealing with small sets of say 30 or 50 causing the application to use a lot of cpu
Kevin Phillips
@phillipskevin
you could do that manually
using an asynchronous getter
but I would wait until you run into an issue like that before doing that kind of thing
most of the time, you should let the event batching system take care of that kind of thing for you
@Bajix wouldn’t this.__listSet tell can-connect that it’s the same list?
Thomas Sieverding
@Bajix
@phillipskevin You’d merge the two sets
Nico R.
@nriesco
@phillipskevin ok thanks!
Kevin Phillips
@phillipskevin
ok @Bajix I’m sure I’ll understand some day
for now I’m going to take your word for it :smile:
Thomas Sieverding
@Bajix
Well that works too
That’s how it works ^
Or at least that would clarify
Kevin Phillips
@phillipskevin
thanks
Thomas Sieverding
@Bajix
@phillipskevin I don’t suppose you could do a release w/ canjs/steal-stache#11 & canjs/can-connect#210 merged?
Kevin Phillips
@phillipskevin
individual releases of those? or a canjs/canjs release?
Thomas Sieverding
@Bajix
Just those
They are forcing an older version of jQuery
Kevin Phillips
@phillipskevin
yeah
sorry, yeah I know that’s the issue
let me see if I can get added to steal-stache
Thomas Sieverding
@Bajix
Cool thanks
Kevin Phillips
@phillipskevin
any reason to use ^3.1.1 || ^2.2.4 instead of 2.x - 3.x
Thomas Sieverding
@Bajix
When I had tested it on steal-stache, 2.x - 3.x was installing 2.2.4, but perhaps that was from the circular reference with can-view-imports
There doesn’t seem to be any good reason to support older 3.x or 2.x
I was hoping that this syntax would be better for Travis CI
Kevin Phillips
@phillipskevin
just that people might already have them as dependencies
Thomas Sieverding
@Bajix
That wouldn’t matter
Kevin Phillips
@phillipskevin
I don’t think I’ll be able to release them today
Thomas Sieverding
@Bajix
Is that just because of the above?
What I mean to say is that it’s a non-issue with people already having them as dependencies as the existing projects would be semantically compatible anyway
Kevin Phillips
@phillipskevin
yeah, I understand what you mean
just not sure if @justinbmeyer cares one way or the other
so I’d rather have him dismiss his review
also, it’s time for dinner
Thomas Sieverding
@Bajix
I can just do 2.x - 3.x if that means we can release ASAP
Kevin Phillips
@phillipskevin
ok, sure
Thomas Sieverding
@Bajix
Done
Kevin Phillips
@phillipskevin
Thomas Sieverding
@Bajix
Sweeetness
Thank you sir! Now I can live in the world of real Promises :D
Kevin Phillips
@phillipskevin
:thumbsup:
Thomas Sieverding
@Bajix
@phillipskevin Could you release https://github.com/donejs/autorender/tree/can3 as 0.9.0-pre.2?
Thomas Sieverding
@Bajix
@phillipskevin another dependency PR canjs/can-map-define#22
Kevin Phillips
@phillipskevin
@Bajix can we just remove jquery from that one?
we did just enable greenkeeper also, so that should take care of the rest of the dependencies
just bumping to the latest versions
I’m slowly going through the 50+ PRs from greenkeeper
for autorender, the "got the appstate” test is failing for me