Where communities thrive


  • Join over 1.5M+ people
  • Join over 100K+ communities
  • Free without limits
  • Create your own community
People
Repo info
Activity
  • Oct 18 22:20
    greenkeeper[bot] labeled #5391
  • Oct 18 22:20
    greenkeeper[bot] opened #5391
  • Oct 18 22:20

    greenkeeper[bot] on can-observable-mixin-1.0.3

    fix(package): update can-observ… (compare)

  • Oct 18 19:08
    cherifGsoul labeled #5390
  • Oct 18 19:07
    cherifGsoul opened #5390
  • Oct 18 18:45
    greenkeeper[bot] labeled #5389
  • Oct 18 18:45
    greenkeeper[bot] opened #5389
  • Oct 18 18:45

    greenkeeper[bot] on can-observable-bindings-1.3.0

    fix(package): update can-observ… (compare)

  • Oct 18 18:29

    matthewp on master

    Update dist for release (compare)

  • Oct 18 18:29

    matthewp on v6.1.3

    Update dist for release 6.1.3 (compare)

  • Oct 18 17:59

    matthewp on can-observable-array-1.0.2

    (compare)

  • Oct 18 17:59

    matthewp on master

    fix(package): update can-observ… Merge pull request #5388 from c… (compare)

  • Oct 18 17:59
    matthewp closed #5388
  • Oct 18 16:46
    greenkeeper[bot] labeled #5388
  • Oct 18 16:46
    greenkeeper[bot] opened #5388
  • Oct 18 16:46

    greenkeeper[bot] on can-observable-array-1.0.2

    fix(package): update can-observ… (compare)

  • Oct 18 12:45
    greenkeeper[bot] labeled #5387
  • Oct 18 12:45
    greenkeeper[bot] opened #5387
  • Oct 18 12:45

    greenkeeper[bot] on can-stache-element-1.0.2

    fix(package): update can-stache… (compare)

  • Oct 18 09:49
    chasenlehara edited #5384
Thomas Sieverding
@Bajix
@phillipskevin I don’t suppose you could do a release w/ canjs/steal-stache#11 & canjs/can-connect#210 merged?
Kevin Phillips
@phillipskevin
individual releases of those? or a canjs/canjs release?
Thomas Sieverding
@Bajix
Just those
They are forcing an older version of jQuery
Kevin Phillips
@phillipskevin
yeah
sorry, yeah I know that’s the issue
let me see if I can get added to steal-stache
Thomas Sieverding
@Bajix
Cool thanks
Kevin Phillips
@phillipskevin
any reason to use ^3.1.1 || ^2.2.4 instead of 2.x - 3.x
Thomas Sieverding
@Bajix
When I had tested it on steal-stache, 2.x - 3.x was installing 2.2.4, but perhaps that was from the circular reference with can-view-imports
There doesn’t seem to be any good reason to support older 3.x or 2.x
I was hoping that this syntax would be better for Travis CI
Kevin Phillips
@phillipskevin
just that people might already have them as dependencies
Thomas Sieverding
@Bajix
That wouldn’t matter
Kevin Phillips
@phillipskevin
I don’t think I’ll be able to release them today
Thomas Sieverding
@Bajix
Is that just because of the above?
What I mean to say is that it’s a non-issue with people already having them as dependencies as the existing projects would be semantically compatible anyway
Kevin Phillips
@phillipskevin
yeah, I understand what you mean
just not sure if @justinbmeyer cares one way or the other
so I’d rather have him dismiss his review
also, it’s time for dinner
Thomas Sieverding
@Bajix
I can just do 2.x - 3.x if that means we can release ASAP
Kevin Phillips
@phillipskevin
ok, sure
Thomas Sieverding
@Bajix
Done
Kevin Phillips
@phillipskevin
Thomas Sieverding
@Bajix
Sweeetness
Thank you sir! Now I can live in the world of real Promises :D
Kevin Phillips
@phillipskevin
:thumbsup:
Thomas Sieverding
@Bajix
@phillipskevin Could you release https://github.com/donejs/autorender/tree/can3 as 0.9.0-pre.2?
Thomas Sieverding
@Bajix
@phillipskevin another dependency PR canjs/can-map-define#22
Kevin Phillips
@phillipskevin
@Bajix can we just remove jquery from that one?
we did just enable greenkeeper also, so that should take care of the rest of the dependencies
just bumping to the latest versions
I’m slowly going through the 50+ PRs from greenkeeper
for autorender, the "got the appstate” test is failing for me
Gira Minus
@gKreator
blob
Just took off steal-build-tools for testing and I see this... but the app still runs
Cleared cache
Thomas Sieverding
@Bajix
@phillipskevin Greenkeeper doesn’t work for your jQuery use case - I think the wide range though might just mean it never includes jQuery in updates, so that’s moot
Kevin Phillips
@phillipskevin
yeah, I meant for the non-jquery stuff
it won’t put in a PR if the latest is covered by the semver range
Thomas Sieverding
@Bajix
I’ll take another look at done-autorender
Gira Minus
@gKreator
Thanks, I'll check it out
Kevin Phillips
@phillipskevin
@Bajix I can release a pre of autorender tomorrow if it gets fixed up
Thomas Sieverding
@Bajix
What about doing a can-map-define release tonight?
Kevin Phillips
@phillipskevin
does it need jQuery?
Thomas Sieverding
@Bajix
It has jquery in it’s dependencies
Whether it needs it can wait
Gira Minus
@gKreator
@phillipskevin Thnaks, that worked!